Kamiya calls out "international finance capital" and even pointed out the jewish groups behind it. (though he later edited the book to remove the jewish part).He pointed out that jewish finance caused a lot of problems. Yet he's also a part of the yamato jewish friendship organization.
And he constantly flip flops on his positions.
Where does this guy's loyalties actually lie?
His original book did get published with mentions about jews and jewish finance groups. . Its only the revised version of the same book that he wrote 2 years later, that removed mentions of jews, after israel complained.
No that's where being Nietzsche got him, you should be able to separate his philosophy from the details of his life. He also failed to live up to many of his ideals, it doesn't mean they weren't worthwhile ideals to pursue.
Nietzsche's hyper-individualism and radical social constructivism are incompatible with anything Right-Wing to Far-Right. I doubt that Hitler even liked Nietzsche: the closest evidence, I think, is a photo of Hitler looking at a bust of Nietzsche somewhere. However, Hitler was also quoted as saying that Nietzsche was 'not my guide'.
The Schopenhauer-Hitler narrative is more compelling because we know, contrary to the 'dumb Hitler' narrative, that Hitler carried Schopenhauer's Complete Works around with him in the trenches. But I don't see any of the Hindu or Buddhist influences (e.g. preoccupation with ending suffering, belief that the phenomenal world is illusory [something that Kantianism, also a major influence on Schopenhauer, shares with Ancient Indian philosophy]) on Schopenhauer in Hitler, whereas they can be seen in known Schopenhauerians like Mainlander and Bahnsen.
International Financial Capital is the Globalists. The problem is that they're not calling out people who are useful in fulfilling strategic objectives like the IMF. They'll call out the WEF, maybe some the Fed, but few the IMF.
They don’t like to call out “international finance capital” because it puts even more of a spotlight on their true masters.
Kamiya calls out "international finance capital" and even pointed out the jewish groups behind it. (though he later edited the book to remove the jewish part).He pointed out that jewish finance caused a lot of problems. Yet he's also a part of the yamato jewish friendship organization. And he constantly flip flops on his positions. Where does this guy's loyalties actually lie?
It's like he wants to get the word out but it's also as if the people who control the financing also control 99% of publishing.
His original book did get published with mentions about jews and jewish finance groups. . Its only the revised version of the same book that he wrote 2 years later, that removed mentions of jews, after israel complained.
I imagine he pays just enough lip service to not suddenly commit suicide, given previous stances about who is responsible.
Calling out "international finance capital" is a good way to get yourself suicided.
"Just start your own bank, Muammar!"
They should just say jews
Capitalism is when you prevent people from exchanging goods, apparently
I've said it before, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche were never disproven.
Their just lost on the battlefield to superior logistics and invading Russia in winter.
Nietzsche was disproven via going insane and spending the last decade of his life in an asylum.
That's where his philosophy led him.
No that's where being Nietzsche got him, you should be able to separate his philosophy from the details of his life. He also failed to live up to many of his ideals, it doesn't mean they weren't worthwhile ideals to pursue.
Schopenhauer's own mom called him a midwit.
Yes because women are never shitty and have never said anything bad or done anything harmful to their children before.
I'm not even going to comment on whether or not the guy is a midwit I'm just saying your argumentation is dog shit
Nietzsche's hyper-individualism and radical social constructivism are incompatible with anything Right-Wing to Far-Right. I doubt that Hitler even liked Nietzsche: the closest evidence, I think, is a photo of Hitler looking at a bust of Nietzsche somewhere. However, Hitler was also quoted as saying that Nietzsche was 'not my guide'.
The Schopenhauer-Hitler narrative is more compelling because we know, contrary to the 'dumb Hitler' narrative, that Hitler carried Schopenhauer's Complete Works around with him in the trenches. But I don't see any of the Hindu or Buddhist influences (e.g. preoccupation with ending suffering, belief that the phenomenal world is illusory [something that Kantianism, also a major influence on Schopenhauer, shares with Ancient Indian philosophy]) on Schopenhauer in Hitler, whereas they can be seen in known Schopenhauerians like Mainlander and Bahnsen.
International Financial Capital is the Globalists. The problem is that they're not calling out people who are useful in fulfilling strategic objectives like the IMF. They'll call out the WEF, maybe some the Fed, but few the IMF.