No that's where being Nietzsche got him, you should be able to separate his philosophy from the details of his life. He also failed to live up to many of his ideals, it doesn't mean they weren't worthwhile ideals to pursue.
Nietzsche's hyper-individualism and radical social constructivism are incompatible with anything Right-Wing to Far-Right. I doubt that Hitler even liked Nietzsche: the closest evidence, I think, is a photo of Hitler looking at a bust of Nietzsche somewhere. However, Hitler was also quoted as saying that Nietzsche was 'not my guide'.
The Schopenhauer-Hitler narrative is more compelling because we know, contrary to the 'dumb Hitler' narrative, that Hitler carried Schopenhauer's Complete Works around with him in the trenches. But I don't see any of the Hindu or Buddhist influences (e.g. preoccupation with ending suffering, belief that the phenomenal world is illusory [something that Kantianism, also a major influence on Schopenhauer, shares with Ancient Indian philosophy]) on Schopenhauer in Hitler, whereas they can be seen in known Schopenhauerians like Mainlander and Bahnsen.
I've said it before, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche were never disproven.
Their just lost on the battlefield to superior logistics and invading Russia in winter.
Nietzsche was disproven via going insane and spending the last decade of his life in an asylum.
That's where his philosophy led him.
No that's where being Nietzsche got him, you should be able to separate his philosophy from the details of his life. He also failed to live up to many of his ideals, it doesn't mean they weren't worthwhile ideals to pursue.
Schopenhauer's own mom called him a midwit.
Yes because women are never shitty and have never said anything bad or done anything harmful to their children before.
I'm not even going to comment on whether or not the guy is a midwit I'm just saying your argumentation is dog shit
Nietzsche's hyper-individualism and radical social constructivism are incompatible with anything Right-Wing to Far-Right. I doubt that Hitler even liked Nietzsche: the closest evidence, I think, is a photo of Hitler looking at a bust of Nietzsche somewhere. However, Hitler was also quoted as saying that Nietzsche was 'not my guide'.
The Schopenhauer-Hitler narrative is more compelling because we know, contrary to the 'dumb Hitler' narrative, that Hitler carried Schopenhauer's Complete Works around with him in the trenches. But I don't see any of the Hindu or Buddhist influences (e.g. preoccupation with ending suffering, belief that the phenomenal world is illusory [something that Kantianism, also a major influence on Schopenhauer, shares with Ancient Indian philosophy]) on Schopenhauer in Hitler, whereas they can be seen in known Schopenhauerians like Mainlander and Bahnsen.