Calling Tucker part of a plot to get rightwing Christians back on the plantation is...insane.
He's one of the most pro-actual-Christian people in the mainstream consciousness, and is willing to talk with anyone, so actually is bridging the gap this guy is accusing him of trying to divide with. He's also done more to call out dispensationalism, and thus "Judeo-Christianity," than almost anyone.
It's just such a weird attack, and shows the absolutist thinking of some people; if you attack Fuentes (who is retarded on a fair bit) you're clearly in the pocket of Big Jewry. Or, and hear me out...you might just not like Fuentes and some of his retarded actions. Shocking, I know.
I'm sure Tucker plays up certain aspects of his personality, just like anyone in the spotlight, but he seems to be moving things in a good direction, trying to reach a large coalition, while trying to avoid falling into the far reaches of extremism.
The program aims to capture an audience of right-wing Christians who are critical of Israel and rein them back into the fold of pro-Israel politics.
LOL. LMAO.
...nudge American discussions away from what they fear: a both-sides right-left rejection of enslavement to the Jewish supremacy program for the world.
Tucker is one of the only conservatives who isn't afraid to find common ground with out-and-out leftists. Heck, in some cases Tucker makes a better leftist argument than 99% of leftists.
This retard is just butthurt Tucker took shots at his boyfriend. Embarrassing.
That Ted Cruz interview is the single greatest 'mask off' moment for American politicians, which is why the smear machine kicked up in such high gear.
The last part is also interesting. I've seen many leftists in the past two months praise Tucker, MTG and Thomas Massie. So it's not even just explicitly trying to find common ground, but also just standing on good principle.
His interview with Saagar Enjeti was great. While I didn't agree with much of the lefty bent, it was at least grounded, polite, coming from a place of genuine concern and, most importantly, was discussing real issues. Lefties tend to be pretty retarded on economics, but at least they can often call out legitimate problems, some of which the right want to sweep under the rug. Bootstraps, bruh.
And, although I haven't seen it, and probably wouldn't enjoy it too much, he had Ana Kasparian on too. Although it might be painful, it's probably interesting too. I'll probably bite the bullet and listen to it while working next week.
His interview with Saagar Enjeti was great. While I didn't agree with much of the lefty bent
I thought Saagar Enjeti was on the (populist) right, at least regarded as.
Lefties tend to be pretty retarded on economics, but at least they can often call out legitimate problems, some of which the right want to sweep under the rug. Bootstraps, bruh.
As an aside, the right in America generally cheers for European politicians who are far to the left of the Democrats on economic policies. Someone like Le Pen is to the left of Macron on economic policies, and Macron is far to the left of Democrats. I may disagree in part (though I'm nowhere nearly as right-wing economically as any US politician), but it's about saving Europe. It's funny though how people here call Democrats "Bolsheviks" while thinking Le Pen is great.
And, although I haven't seen it, and probably wouldn't enjoy it too much, he had Ana Kasparian on too. Although it might be painful, it's probably interesting too. I'll probably bite the bullet and listen to it while working next week.
It's really not that bad. They cover mostly the stuff that they agreed on. Ana did bash some of the aspects of the 'Big Beautiful Bill', but if I'm honest, I thought it was pretty bad in parts as well even if good overall.
I thought Saagar Enjeti was on the (populist) right, at least regarded as.
Is he? I'm not familiar, that would be funny though. Sounded pretty left on a bunch of stuff, and he does a show with Krystal Ball who, although not the worst of the bunch, is still an insufferable and deranged leftist on a ton. Wikipedia is saying Saagar is populist right, yeah. That's quite interesting, maybe I'll listen to a bit of their show, even if Krystal is a retard. I'd be interested in the dynamics and politics going on over there.
As an aside, the right in America generally cheers for European politicians who are far to the left of the Democrats on economic policies.
I mean, it's Europe, anyone prominent is going to be left. The issue with people like Le Pen is, she at least acts like a populist. That's what attracts the right. No matter what her other policies, she says we have to turn back on the issues that are destroying society; that's a powerful message to everyone. The populist/nationalist right loves populists, nationalists, and the concepts or getting back on a better track and actually having countries look after their own people.
Is he? I'm not familiar, that would be funny though. Sounded pretty left on a bunch of stuff, and he does a show with Krystal Ball who, although not the worst of the bunch, is still an insufferable and deranged leftist on a ton.
I think the point of the show is "populist right" and "populist left". I remember Krystal Ball for persecuting the Covington Boys, so she is indeed a very damaged human being.
Wikipedia is saying Saagar is populist right,
Hiss
That's quite interesting, maybe I'll listen to a bit of their show, even if Krystal is a retard. I'd be interested in the dynamics and politics going on over there.
They're generally good on war and Epstein - but you figured that out from the talk.
I mean, it's Europe, anyone prominent is going to be left. The issue with people like Le Pen is, she at least acts like a populist. That's what attracts the right. No matter what her other policies, she says we have to turn back on the issues that are destroying society; that's a powerful message to everyone. The populist/nationalist right loves populists, nationalists, and the concepts or getting back on a better track and actually having countries look after their own people.
I know why they support her. For the same reason I support her (I'm way to the left of USAmericans economically as well, but not as far as Le Pen). But it's still ironic.
Cruz almost seems chosen by God to be the failure catalyst that saves the Right over and over.
His complete fake persona during the 2016 campaign is what gave Trump the leg up he needed to go from joke candidate to real shot, because next to the GOP stooge Cruz he could only be better.
Then he spent all of that administration showing what appealing to MAGA guys could do for your image. He went from Lyin Ted to Lion Ted and had genuine support behind him. Even if he did fucking nothing with that, and it was all theater on his part, it was a shining beacon that Trump supporters were willing to back guys who fought back.
And now he has completely exposed the Israel problem to a wide audience in a way that cannot just be brushed off as "antisemitic conspiracy" completely. While its not "HAPPENING" levels, it'll likely be a foundational brick in any future dismantling of said toxic relationship between the two nations.
His failure of an existence has done more to destroy the GOP and their old ways than almost anyone, and he really deserves applause for continuing to help us all in doing so.
Nick can be right about a fair number of things but people don't want to hear it from a lispy autist. Likewise Tucker can only be "right" in the "water is wet" sense but a lot more palatable to watch because of his screen presence. It's just how people are.
Weird how there seems to be a lot of infighting on the edge of the mainstream and dissident right lately. Don't know why.
The infighting is actually a whitepill because it means the right is ascendant. Winning factions start squabbling after victory. The left is severely weakened at the moment and largely irrelevant.
He's saying the Ted Cruz interview was a watershed moment in exposing dispensationalism. I agree with that. No politician of that prominence has been grilled so severely on their pseudo theology like Cruz.
I'm not quite sure what you mean. Firstly, it's a subjective opinion, as it's hard to measure.
But Tucker - who has a massive, massive platform - calling out Ted Cruz sparked a shit ton of conversation on the issue. It's hard to think of anyone who drew more attention to those concepts than Tucker did.
Bud if you don't pay attention to any of the interviews Tucker does then you're not really allowed to sit here and try to act like you fucking know something that other people don't.
What a jumped up, smarmy response that falls flat in 3 seconds. You're a cunt.
Bud if you don't pay attention to any of the interviews Tucker does
Wow, a man who was paid for decades by a group of people to read scripts they wrote on television channels they own said something. That means literally anything is happening!
Is that emotive enough for you, or do I actually have to believe what the television tells me, too?
then you're not really allowed to sit here and try to act like you fucking know something that other people don’t.
I do, though. 100% guaranteed. About this specific topic, even. And vice versa. This isn’t even remotely in question. I’m under no illusions here. Either actually pass the Sally-Ann Test or stop expecting to be treated like an adult.
What a jumped up, smarmy response that falls flat in 3 seconds. You're a cunt.
Thanks for admitting that
You cannot provide any evidence of this whatsoever, even when directly asked.
It isn’t happening. Not even slightly.
He has said absolutely nothing on this topic subsequent to the interview in question.
He either doesn’t know, or he knows and doesn’t care, or he knows and actively works to the opposite effect–as he had for the previous several decades
You’re too much of a coward to even try to defend your worldview under the slightest possible resistance.
I mean, holy shit, you almost run afoul of one of the board rules by replying so impotently.
Context to this is that Tucker recently took a shot at Nick Fuentes, calling him a fed, and now the outcast right wing influencers (mostly people who are explicitly anti-Jewish) are calling Tucker a fed.
The fact that JF Gariepy is one of the yappers in the second camp is hilarious and one of the reasons I always reserve doubts about them.
JF was married to a slightly retarded woman as of a few years ago. After the woman disappeared, he claimed she asked him to drop her off in the woods and continued streaming while maintaining perfect incuriosity about the situation. Subsequently he also released a video about deep cleaning his house. I continue to be shocked that this guy has both evaded punishment for his crimes and also maintains a following.
He has. He just called out Israel by name at CPAC and interviewed the Green Beret whistleblower on the IDF shooting children. I don't think there's much more he could do to advocate against Israel.
Yeah I don’t like or trust Fuentes for being a Catholic (the OG American subverters) but I’m not sure why Tucker went after him. It’s funny though because Fuentes supporters share one braincell and use it to follow their kings exact word.
Likely because Fuentes is the "biggest" of the fringe right wing movements, or was at least for some years. And he is representative of most things wrong with them at that.
Its easy dunking material, and has a legion of easy converts from his ranks of single-brain celled followers who are pissed off and are obviously vulnerable to being convinced with a few appealing words.
Its likely very similar to Brietbart sending Milo to appeal to the Gamergate crowd when that was taking off, the legacy right wing seeing a fresh bunch of angry dissents to recruit from.
Yes but the Faggot Fed Fuentes says he's a fed because Tucker made fun of him and the low IQ Fuentes Fanboys updated their programming. Now Tucker could be a fed but Fuentes definitely is
He's certainly got ammo, but he's only doing this now because Tucker called him out. Fuentes transparently works on the basis of grievances and drama. I mean, he's gay.
Tucker wears the red string Kabbalah bracelet around his wrist. I wouldn't trust him, either. This isn't an endorsement of Fuentes, either, btw, who I think is a faggot and a fraud also.
It's actually very informative that you're out of the loop. It shows how the powers that be have been spinning what Tucker does. He's definitely not "anti-Jew". Not even "anti-Israel" in my view, just like you're not anti-American if you're critical of the US government, or I am anti-Europe because I despise our treasonous leaders.
I just know they've been accusing him of anti-Semitism because he's opposed to getting involved with Iran and said he thinks the Epstein files are being withheld because they incriminate Israeli intelligence agencies.
Because you can't coverup waging war on Iran is for Israels benefit. For the Iraq wars they did. Most people today still don't know that they were Israeli proxy wars.
I know David Frum called them 'unpatriotic conservatives'. At the time, the neocons at least pretended that their projects had something to do with the country whose resources they were commandeering.
Reading this again, it's amazing just how correct the people he's criticizing were. Not even just on the Iraq War, but even on something like this:
Common cause: The websites of the antiwar conservatives approvingly cite and link to the writings of John Pilger, Robert Fisk, Noam Chomsky, Ted Rall, Gore Vidal, Alexander Cockburn, and other anti-Americans of the far Left.
Often they advertised positions for jobs within the government but already knew who they were going to hire. They had to interview a quota of people to give the illusion that they had an open job advertisement and screened applicants according to law. But Human Resources and Management already knew who they wanted to hire. I remember greeting a few of the applicants in the lobby (not my job to greet them), who looked so hopeful and prepared, and i had knowledge that the interview wasn't real and their prospect of getting hired was not real. I felt very bad for them. I did not tell them because i did not want to be that bearer of bad news and wasn't sure they'd even believe me if i told them.
Imagine going to a job interview. You dress your best. You shave. You sleep well. You rehearse and practice job interview questions. You print your resume on expensive good quality paper. You wake up early . Look your best. You get to the job interview and completely knock it out of the park. You answer every question perfectly. You make some people laugh. You look your best. You cite your experience and prove to the people in the room you have the skills and experience and confidence and ability. You leave the job interview feeling proud of yourself.
But it wasn't real. They were never going to hire you. Because of diversity quotas or nepotism or because the city councilman wants to give his nephew or niece a job it was never really an open position to the public for anyone to get.
I was ultimately terminated during ScamDemic for not wearing masks. They bent some rules and interpretations of HR policy to find a way to get rid of me.
I'd received multiple promotions, good annual reviews each year, no prior violations of policies. It was actually my novice (not advanced) programming skills with SQL and visual basic that helped me get some promotions and automate tasks. Normie Government employees can't even type let alone automate tasks or program anything to work well on a computer.
Trump doesn't arrest anyone. The worst that happens to any criminal under Trump regime is they get terminated. Well i was unfairly terminated. So what kind of consequence is that?
Thanks to Affirmative Action and most DEI policies that's really how a lot of places operate once you get above the entry level.
They won't say no to the white guys directly for being white, but they will happily waste their time to make it seem like their pet nigger/woman totally beat out all these qualified candidates and they worked so hard searching out quality hires for their boss/business.
From reading the headline before opening the thread, I thought this was going to be about JF calling the Aarvoll RTTL guy fucking his ex-wife a decade ago on camera "wholesome".
He called him a “weird gay kid” multiple times. Which was odd.
He has a number of ad hominem comments about “how young he is” and how that somehow disqualifies him from doing research and having opinions.
And to nick’s point. It is very odd that Tucker would bold face lie about his father’s involvement in the CIA when he is on the record as saying his father was in the cia
Not to mention, he chooses to conduct this interview with Candace Owens, who has very obvious personal beef with Nick, right after her failed hit piece.
Tucker seems to have a very deliberate and focused interest in Nick for having “never watched his show” and some very specific criticism for having not researched him at all.
Nick has one position:jews control America, get them out. I don’t see a problem with that position.
Tucker says Nick is dishonestly embellishing right wing views to retarded extremes to discredit the right, which is something that I've observed several times.
Just to take one very well known instance, he and Kanye went to Mar-a-lago to ask Trump to be Kanye's presidential running mate. The thought process behind that is mind boggling, but suffice it to say you'd only do that if you didn't have any serious stake in the 2024 election.
Then in the election itself Nick praised Kamala's retarded astroturfed entry into the race and ratcheted up criticism of Trump out of nowhere. This one-sided feud led to Nick deploying groypers to actually campaign against Trump.
Trump has been a huge disappointment on Israel, but I think it's easy to see that he is a million times better for the right wing movement than Kamala, unless you're an accelerationist and you think that killing and jailing Republicans and more tranny molestation and censorship is going to eventually make America better off.
Nick has been very open in his criticism of Trump. This is not some sort of covert subversion tactic, it’s a blatant obvious and explicit “listen to our America first agenda or we won’t vote for you”.
He also, correctly, stated that trumps victory in 2024 would normalize neoconservatism again and an israel first political establishment among the “far right” which is exactly what’s happening.
You can disagree with his strategy and tactics but I think he’s been very consistent and transparent about what he’s doing and why.
His support of Trump has been extremely inconsistent. Just in the 2024 election cycle he supported Trump, dropped Trump, thanked God for Trump after the bullet didn't kill him, then dropped Trump again and declared he would campaign against Trump.
All of that being said, anyone who campaigned against Trump in 2024 is a retard or subversive, which was my point.
He also, correctly, stated that trumps victory in 2024 would normalize neoconservatism again and an israel first political establishment among the “far right” which is exactly what’s happening.
That is exactly what is not happening as Israel's support is in free fall like the Twin Towers. Tucker just called out Israel at CPAC, dude. Now you could say correctly that the Trump admin is ridiculously pro-Israel, but your comment seemed to address the conservative movement at large.
You can disagree with his strategy and tactics but I think he’s been very consistent and transparent about what he’s doing and why.
"I think Vivek Ramaswamy is the best candidate for 2028" -- Nick Fuentes, championing an Indian anchor baby that even Ann Coulter had shut down at that point
Calling Tucker part of a plot to get rightwing Christians back on the plantation is...insane.
He's one of the most pro-actual-Christian people in the mainstream consciousness, and is willing to talk with anyone, so actually is bridging the gap this guy is accusing him of trying to divide with. He's also done more to call out dispensationalism, and thus "Judeo-Christianity," than almost anyone.
It's just such a weird attack, and shows the absolutist thinking of some people; if you attack Fuentes (who is retarded on a fair bit) you're clearly in the pocket of Big Jewry. Or, and hear me out...you might just not like Fuentes and some of his retarded actions. Shocking, I know.
I'm sure Tucker plays up certain aspects of his personality, just like anyone in the spotlight, but he seems to be moving things in a good direction, trying to reach a large coalition, while trying to avoid falling into the far reaches of extremism.
LOL. LMAO.
Tucker is one of the only conservatives who isn't afraid to find common ground with out-and-out leftists. Heck, in some cases Tucker makes a better leftist argument than 99% of leftists.
This retard is just butthurt Tucker took shots at his boyfriend. Embarrassing.
That Ted Cruz interview is the single greatest 'mask off' moment for American politicians, which is why the smear machine kicked up in such high gear.
The last part is also interesting. I've seen many leftists in the past two months praise Tucker, MTG and Thomas Massie. So it's not even just explicitly trying to find common ground, but also just standing on good principle.
His interview with Saagar Enjeti was great. While I didn't agree with much of the lefty bent, it was at least grounded, polite, coming from a place of genuine concern and, most importantly, was discussing real issues. Lefties tend to be pretty retarded on economics, but at least they can often call out legitimate problems, some of which the right want to sweep under the rug. Bootstraps, bruh.
And, although I haven't seen it, and probably wouldn't enjoy it too much, he had Ana Kasparian on too. Although it might be painful, it's probably interesting too. I'll probably bite the bullet and listen to it while working next week.
I thought Saagar Enjeti was on the (populist) right, at least regarded as.
As an aside, the right in America generally cheers for European politicians who are far to the left of the Democrats on economic policies. Someone like Le Pen is to the left of Macron on economic policies, and Macron is far to the left of Democrats. I may disagree in part (though I'm nowhere nearly as right-wing economically as any US politician), but it's about saving Europe. It's funny though how people here call Democrats "Bolsheviks" while thinking Le Pen is great.
It's really not that bad. They cover mostly the stuff that they agreed on. Ana did bash some of the aspects of the 'Big Beautiful Bill', but if I'm honest, I thought it was pretty bad in parts as well even if good overall.
Is he? I'm not familiar, that would be funny though. Sounded pretty left on a bunch of stuff, and he does a show with Krystal Ball who, although not the worst of the bunch, is still an insufferable and deranged leftist on a ton. Wikipedia is saying Saagar is populist right, yeah. That's quite interesting, maybe I'll listen to a bit of their show, even if Krystal is a retard. I'd be interested in the dynamics and politics going on over there.
I mean, it's Europe, anyone prominent is going to be left. The issue with people like Le Pen is, she at least acts like a populist. That's what attracts the right. No matter what her other policies, she says we have to turn back on the issues that are destroying society; that's a powerful message to everyone. The populist/nationalist right loves populists, nationalists, and the concepts or getting back on a better track and actually having countries look after their own people.
I think the point of the show is "populist right" and "populist left". I remember Krystal Ball for persecuting the Covington Boys, so she is indeed a very damaged human being.
Hiss
They're generally good on war and Epstein - but you figured that out from the talk.
I know why they support her. For the same reason I support her (I'm way to the left of USAmericans economically as well, but not as far as Le Pen). But it's still ironic.
Cruz almost seems chosen by God to be the failure catalyst that saves the Right over and over.
His complete fake persona during the 2016 campaign is what gave Trump the leg up he needed to go from joke candidate to real shot, because next to the GOP stooge Cruz he could only be better.
Then he spent all of that administration showing what appealing to MAGA guys could do for your image. He went from Lyin Ted to Lion Ted and had genuine support behind him. Even if he did fucking nothing with that, and it was all theater on his part, it was a shining beacon that Trump supporters were willing to back guys who fought back.
And now he has completely exposed the Israel problem to a wide audience in a way that cannot just be brushed off as "antisemitic conspiracy" completely. While its not "HAPPENING" levels, it'll likely be a foundational brick in any future dismantling of said toxic relationship between the two nations.
His failure of an existence has done more to destroy the GOP and their old ways than almost anyone, and he really deserves applause for continuing to help us all in doing so.
Nick can be right about a fair number of things but people don't want to hear it from a lispy autist. Likewise Tucker can only be "right" in the "water is wet" sense but a lot more palatable to watch because of his screen presence. It's just how people are.
Weird how there seems to be a lot of infighting on the edge of the mainstream and dissident right lately. Don't know why.
The infighting is actually a whitepill because it means the right is ascendant. Winning factions start squabbling after victory. The left is severely weakened at the moment and largely irrelevant.
Got any evidence of this whatsoever?
He's saying the Ted Cruz interview was a watershed moment in exposing dispensationalism. I agree with that. No politician of that prominence has been grilled so severely on their pseudo theology like Cruz.
I'm not quite sure what you mean. Firstly, it's a subjective opinion, as it's hard to measure.
But Tucker - who has a massive, massive platform - calling out Ted Cruz sparked a shit ton of conversation on the issue. It's hard to think of anyone who drew more attention to those concepts than Tucker did.
Bud if you don't pay attention to any of the interviews Tucker does then you're not really allowed to sit here and try to act like you fucking know something that other people don't.
What a jumped up, smarmy response that falls flat in 3 seconds. You're a cunt.
Wow, a man who was paid for decades by a group of people to read scripts they wrote on television channels they own said something. That means literally anything is happening!
Is that emotive enough for you, or do I actually have to believe what the television tells me, too?
I do, though. 100% guaranteed. About this specific topic, even. And vice versa. This isn’t even remotely in question. I’m under no illusions here. Either actually pass the Sally-Ann Test or stop expecting to be treated like an adult.
Thanks for admitting that
I mean, holy shit, you almost run afoul of one of the board rules by replying so impotently.
Context to this is that Tucker recently took a shot at Nick Fuentes, calling him a fed, and now the outcast right wing influencers (mostly people who are explicitly anti-Jewish) are calling Tucker a fed.
The fact that JF Gariepy is one of the yappers in the second camp is hilarious and one of the reasons I always reserve doubts about them.
JF was married to a slightly retarded woman as of a few years ago. After the woman disappeared, he claimed she asked him to drop her off in the woods and continued streaming while maintaining perfect incuriosity about the situation. Subsequently he also released a video about deep cleaning his house. I continue to be shocked that this guy has both evaded punishment for his crimes and also maintains a following.
Forgive me if I'm out of the loop since I don't really follow this stuff but hasn't Tucker been if not anti-Jew then anti-Israel as of late?
He has. He just called out Israel by name at CPAC and interviewed the Green Beret whistleblower on the IDF shooting children. I don't think there's much more he could do to advocate against Israel.
Yeah I don’t like or trust Fuentes for being a Catholic (the OG American subverters) but I’m not sure why Tucker went after him. It’s funny though because Fuentes supporters share one braincell and use it to follow their kings exact word.
Likely because Fuentes is the "biggest" of the fringe right wing movements, or was at least for some years. And he is representative of most things wrong with them at that.
Its easy dunking material, and has a legion of easy converts from his ranks of single-brain celled followers who are pissed off and are obviously vulnerable to being convinced with a few appealing words.
Its likely very similar to Brietbart sending Milo to appeal to the Gamergate crowd when that was taking off, the legacy right wing seeing a fresh bunch of angry dissents to recruit from.
Yes but the Faggot Fed Fuentes says he's a fed because Tucker made fun of him and the low IQ Fuentes Fanboys updated their programming. Now Tucker could be a fed but Fuentes definitely is
I thought he was calling him a fed because Tucker's dad was CIA?
He's certainly got ammo, but he's only doing this now because Tucker called him out. Fuentes transparently works on the basis of grievances and drama. I mean, he's gay.
Tucker wears the red string Kabbalah bracelet around his wrist. I wouldn't trust him, either. This isn't an endorsement of Fuentes, either, btw, who I think is a faggot and a fraud also.
It's actually very informative that you're out of the loop. It shows how the powers that be have been spinning what Tucker does. He's definitely not "anti-Jew". Not even "anti-Israel" in my view, just like you're not anti-American if you're critical of the US government, or I am anti-Europe because I despise our treasonous leaders.
I just know they've been accusing him of anti-Semitism because he's opposed to getting involved with Iran and said he thinks the Epstein files are being withheld because they incriminate Israeli intelligence agencies.
They are. Weird, isn't it? You're an anti-semite now if you oppose a war. They didn't use that one with the Iraq War.
Because you can't coverup waging war on Iran is for Israels benefit. For the Iraq wars they did. Most people today still don't know that they were Israeli proxy wars.
Pretty sure neocons like David Frum and Paul Wolfowitz used it.
I know David Frum called them 'unpatriotic conservatives'. At the time, the neocons at least pretended that their projects had something to do with the country whose resources they were commandeering.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2003/03/unpatriotic-conservatives-david-frum/
Reading this again, it's amazing just how correct the people he's criticizing were. Not even just on the Iraq War, but even on something like this:
I worked for government for a few years.
Often they advertised positions for jobs within the government but already knew who they were going to hire. They had to interview a quota of people to give the illusion that they had an open job advertisement and screened applicants according to law. But Human Resources and Management already knew who they wanted to hire. I remember greeting a few of the applicants in the lobby (not my job to greet them), who looked so hopeful and prepared, and i had knowledge that the interview wasn't real and their prospect of getting hired was not real. I felt very bad for them. I did not tell them because i did not want to be that bearer of bad news and wasn't sure they'd even believe me if i told them.
Imagine going to a job interview. You dress your best. You shave. You sleep well. You rehearse and practice job interview questions. You print your resume on expensive good quality paper. You wake up early . Look your best. You get to the job interview and completely knock it out of the park. You answer every question perfectly. You make some people laugh. You look your best. You cite your experience and prove to the people in the room you have the skills and experience and confidence and ability. You leave the job interview feeling proud of yourself.
But it wasn't real. They were never going to hire you. Because of diversity quotas or nepotism or because the city councilman wants to give his nephew or niece a job it was never really an open position to the public for anyone to get.
From what I hear, this is happening to a vast extent in the private sector as well. Our economy is indeed founded on sand.
I was ultimately terminated during ScamDemic for not wearing masks. They bent some rules and interpretations of HR policy to find a way to get rid of me.
I'd received multiple promotions, good annual reviews each year, no prior violations of policies. It was actually my novice (not advanced) programming skills with SQL and visual basic that helped me get some promotions and automate tasks. Normie Government employees can't even type let alone automate tasks or program anything to work well on a computer.
Trump doesn't arrest anyone. The worst that happens to any criminal under Trump regime is they get terminated. Well i was unfairly terminated. So what kind of consequence is that?
Did that "gen z boss and a mini" video wake anyone up or are they still retarded? Give me an atom of hopium.
Thanks to Affirmative Action and most DEI policies that's really how a lot of places operate once you get above the entry level.
They won't say no to the white guys directly for being white, but they will happily waste their time to make it seem like their pet nigger/woman totally beat out all these qualified candidates and they worked so hard searching out quality hires for their boss/business.
From reading the headline before opening the thread, I thought this was going to be about JF calling the Aarvoll RTTL guy fucking his ex-wife a decade ago on camera "wholesome".
Tuckers comments about Fuentes were very bizarre.
He called him a “weird gay kid” multiple times. Which was odd.
He has a number of ad hominem comments about “how young he is” and how that somehow disqualifies him from doing research and having opinions.
And to nick’s point. It is very odd that Tucker would bold face lie about his father’s involvement in the CIA when he is on the record as saying his father was in the cia
Not to mention, he chooses to conduct this interview with Candace Owens, who has very obvious personal beef with Nick, right after her failed hit piece.
Tucker seems to have a very deliberate and focused interest in Nick for having “never watched his show” and some very specific criticism for having not researched him at all.
Nick has one position:jews control America, get them out. I don’t see a problem with that position.
Tucker says Nick is dishonestly embellishing right wing views to retarded extremes to discredit the right, which is something that I've observed several times.
Just to take one very well known instance, he and Kanye went to Mar-a-lago to ask Trump to be Kanye's presidential running mate. The thought process behind that is mind boggling, but suffice it to say you'd only do that if you didn't have any serious stake in the 2024 election.
Then in the election itself Nick praised Kamala's retarded astroturfed entry into the race and ratcheted up criticism of Trump out of nowhere. This one-sided feud led to Nick deploying groypers to actually campaign against Trump.
Trump has been a huge disappointment on Israel, but I think it's easy to see that he is a million times better for the right wing movement than Kamala, unless you're an accelerationist and you think that killing and jailing Republicans and more tranny molestation and censorship is going to eventually make America better off.
Nick has been very open in his criticism of Trump. This is not some sort of covert subversion tactic, it’s a blatant obvious and explicit “listen to our America first agenda or we won’t vote for you”.
He also, correctly, stated that trumps victory in 2024 would normalize neoconservatism again and an israel first political establishment among the “far right” which is exactly what’s happening.
You can disagree with his strategy and tactics but I think he’s been very consistent and transparent about what he’s doing and why.
His support of Trump has been extremely inconsistent. Just in the 2024 election cycle he supported Trump, dropped Trump, thanked God for Trump after the bullet didn't kill him, then dropped Trump again and declared he would campaign against Trump.
All of that being said, anyone who campaigned against Trump in 2024 is a retard or subversive, which was my point.
That is exactly what is not happening as Israel's support is in free fall like the Twin Towers. Tucker just called out Israel at CPAC, dude. Now you could say correctly that the Trump admin is ridiculously pro-Israel, but your comment seemed to address the conservative movement at large.
"I think Vivek Ramaswamy is the best candidate for 2028" -- Nick Fuentes, championing an Indian anchor baby that even Ann Coulter had shut down at that point
Are you aware of any of these things?