This is another Iran moment in that he quite openly abandons American national interests to cater to Miriam Adelson and the rest of the lot that bribed him.
A Palestinian state is relatively unimportant to the US interests compared to a maximally favorable trade agreement with a neighbouring developed country that is orders of magnitude larger and more powerful than Palestine.
Compromising our neighborly trade negations to obtain concessions on Palestine is not in the best interests of US, but it is for the country that does actually neighbor Palestine
My issue with that is that nothing about our negotiations is going to genuinely endanger trade with Canada. However, if Canada insists on supporting terrorism in the ME, then it becomes our problem.
As cucked as the Canucks are, that they would just reverse their stance on Palestine for nothing in return seems the more extraordinary claim than they would try to extract at least some form of concession for their compliance. Given this is happening as part of the trade deal talks, trade terms seem a likely first target.
We tore it up, because we didn't want it. Also, Israel didn't want it.
Iran is our enemy specifically because they have been conducting irregular warfare against the US since the shaw fell and they have shown literally no signs of stopping, ever. We made up with the Taliban faster than we made up with the Ayatollah. Iran really was the largest terror threat until Al-Qaeda and ISIS, and with those out of the way, Iran comes back to the top. Piracy, assassinations, insurgencies, civilian terror attacks, bombing military targets, you name it, the Iranians have done it, continue to do it, and are not interested in stopping.
We tore it up, because we didn't want it. Also, Israel didn't want it.
Who is 'we'? You may not wanted it, because it stopped proliferation. But for people who think that fewer countries should have nukes, stopping the spread of nuclear weapons is good. Netanyahu and Israel were continuously pressuring Trump to cancel the deal, and it didn't help that Trump went "OBAMA'S NAME IS ON IT, WORST EVER".
Iran really was the largest terror threat until Al-Qaeda and ISIS, and with those out of the way
[Syria has entered the conversation.]
Piracy,
Like?
assassinations, insurgencies, civilian terror attacks, bombing military targets, you name it, the Iranians have done it
Jeez, bombing military targets? Did they bomb Fort Bragg? Where were those military targets? Perhaps in a place where you had no business being to begin with?
Where were those insurgencies? In neighboring countries that you had invaded? Yeah, those bastards, putting their country right in the middle of countries you wanted to invade. (In fact, there is very little evidence for this, and this was just the Bush administration deflecting from its disastrous policy in Iraq.)
Oh, and if you want to argue that 'supporting insurgencies' is a bad thing, guess who comes out as a really bad guy?
the Iranians have done it, continue to do it, and are not interested in stopping.
Given the fact that the US coup'ed Iran's government in 1953, supported Saddam Hussein's invasion of Iran in the 1980s (then supplied him with chemical weapons to use against the Iranians, and provided him with diplomatic cover), and has had sanctions to try to wreck as much havoc as possible in Iran...
Who is the greater offender and who the greater victim?
The "Iran Nuclear Deal" by Obama gave Iran atomic weapons as an end goal. It facilitated their drive to make them, it is perhaps the worst "deal" Obama made, and that's really saying something!
It "placed restrictions" which were immediately violated. It placed trade barriers as punishments for violations but Obama let everything slide & left big fat loopholes too.
It said that after X years (10, iirc) they "deal" would be "re-negotiated" to for sure make Iran not have nuclear weapons... except by then they'd be well on the road with no turning back and NO incentive to "deal" with anyone.
The "Iran Nuclear Deal" by Obama gave Iran atomic weapons as an end goal. It facilitated their drive to make them, it is perhaps the worst "deal" Obama made, and that's really saying something!
I'm completely unsurprised that you believe that, given the fact that you supported war with Iran and that you even, in 2025, supported the Iraq War and even claim there were WMD there. You do seem to have a little penchant for supporting wars based on lies about weapons of mass destruction.
It "placed restrictions" which were immediately violated. It placed trade barriers as punishments for violations but Obama let everything slide & left big fat loopholes too.
Piffle. It was the USG and Europe that violated the deal, not Iran. Iran even continued to uphold it for years after Trump pulled out. Iran war supporters kept posting graphs of Iranian enrichment which showed very low levels on enrichment during the deal years. Anyone can easily discover this. Who do you think you're fooling?
It said that after X years (10, iirc) they "deal" would be "re-negotiated" to for sure make Iran not have nuclear weapons... except by then they'd be well on the road with no turning back and NO incentive to "deal" with anyone.
After 10 years, they'd be three weeks from a nuclear weapon like they have been for the past 30 years?
The only nations suicidal enough to take in Palestinian refugees are white western nations, so anyone who cares about the survival of white western nations should support the creation of a Palestinian state in order to keep Palestinians in Palestine.
Since when have either Islamists or Communists ever done either? Segregating them out won't stop them from attacking. You'd need someone else to own the place, either Israel, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, or Jordan.
Oh please. This sub collectively ate crow when iran nonsense got defused in less 24 hours. Meanwhile I've seen nothing from this sub justifying giving some sand niggers credibility from a couple of dying nations.
Do you mean that ceasefire that nearly crumbled? As I said then, Iran's nuclear program isn't done. We'll be back at war with them eventually.
Meanwhile I've seen nothing from this sub justifying giving some sand niggers credibility from a couple of dying nations.
I don't even know what you're trying to say here. I'll highlight your use of "sand niggers" anyway. Zionist shills will engage in open racism like this to one audience while also playing the victim of racial discrimination to other audiences. They have a playbook for everyone and hope you don't notice that there are people who say "sand niggers" who have the same agenda as the ADL.
Defused? People like you think that because dropping bombs and killing people in Iran isn't a big deal to you in your life, you assume that it isn't a big deal to the victims. They were bombed and killed. Their families won't forgive, and they won't forget. You probably also don't understand that blowing people up causes animosity and hatred towards our people. Whites better wake up and get away from these semetic wars before the world takes its anger out on us.
If you think that driving 10 million 'refugees' into Europe is a good thing, you're an Israel First moron of the highest order.
You really shouldn't have a European river in your username when you're striving for our destruction. Name yourself after something American instead, like PeanutAllergy or Fentanyl.
And you sound like quite the terrorist yourself, by the way.
This is another Iran moment in that he quite openly abandons American national interests to cater to Miriam Adelson and the rest of the lot that bribed him.
He is blatantly saying that all his economic policies thus far are for the sake of Israel above America.
It's crazy how blatant it's become. It was always there just under the surface, but I dont know how normies don't connect the dots at this point.
Arguably, being unable to connect dots is the definition of "normie."
How would a Palestinian state be in the interest of the US? Seems like at this point the best case scenario is that it grants Iran a proxy.
That's a fair point, but how is an Israeli state in the interest of the US?
It isn't, besides being a useful weapon to keep the ME unstable and forcing people to negotiate with us in order to keep them in check...
IF WE WOULD ONLY DO THAT
You're seriously advocating for Israel on the basis of their continued impediment to peace?
A Palestinian state is relatively unimportant to the US interests compared to a maximally favorable trade agreement with a neighbouring developed country that is orders of magnitude larger and more powerful than Palestine.
Compromising our neighborly trade negations to obtain concessions on Palestine is not in the best interests of US, but it is for the country that does actually neighbor Palestine
My issue with that is that nothing about our negotiations is going to genuinely endanger trade with Canada. However, if Canada insists on supporting terrorism in the ME, then it becomes our problem.
As cucked as the Canucks are, that they would just reverse their stance on Palestine for nothing in return seems the more extraordinary claim than they would try to extract at least some form of concession for their compliance. Given this is happening as part of the trade deal talks, trade terms seem a likely first target.
And why is Iran your enemy again? Trump tore up the Iran nuclear agreement because Israel wanted that.
We tore it up, because we didn't want it. Also, Israel didn't want it.
Iran is our enemy specifically because they have been conducting irregular warfare against the US since the shaw fell and they have shown literally no signs of stopping, ever. We made up with the Taliban faster than we made up with the Ayatollah. Iran really was the largest terror threat until Al-Qaeda and ISIS, and with those out of the way, Iran comes back to the top. Piracy, assassinations, insurgencies, civilian terror attacks, bombing military targets, you name it, the Iranians have done it, continue to do it, and are not interested in stopping.
Who is 'we'? You may not wanted it, because it stopped proliferation. But for people who think that fewer countries should have nukes, stopping the spread of nuclear weapons is good. Netanyahu and Israel were continuously pressuring Trump to cancel the deal, and it didn't help that Trump went "OBAMA'S NAME IS ON IT, WORST EVER".
[Syria has entered the conversation.]
Like?
Jeez, bombing military targets? Did they bomb Fort Bragg? Where were those military targets? Perhaps in a place where you had no business being to begin with?
Where were those insurgencies? In neighboring countries that you had invaded? Yeah, those bastards, putting their country right in the middle of countries you wanted to invade. (In fact, there is very little evidence for this, and this was just the Bush administration deflecting from its disastrous policy in Iraq.)
Oh, and if you want to argue that 'supporting insurgencies' is a bad thing, guess who comes out as a really bad guy?
Given the fact that the US coup'ed Iran's government in 1953, supported Saddam Hussein's invasion of Iran in the 1980s (then supplied him with chemical weapons to use against the Iranians, and provided him with diplomatic cover), and has had sanctions to try to wreck as much havoc as possible in Iran...
Who is the greater offender and who the greater victim?
The "Iran Nuclear Deal" by Obama gave Iran atomic weapons as an end goal. It facilitated their drive to make them, it is perhaps the worst "deal" Obama made, and that's really saying something!
It "placed restrictions" which were immediately violated. It placed trade barriers as punishments for violations but Obama let everything slide & left big fat loopholes too.
It said that after X years (10, iirc) they "deal" would be "re-negotiated" to for sure make Iran not have nuclear weapons... except by then they'd be well on the road with no turning back and NO incentive to "deal" with anyone.
So Trump tore it up? TWICE? GOOD!
I'm completely unsurprised that you believe that, given the fact that you supported war with Iran and that you even, in 2025, supported the Iraq War and even claim there were WMD there. You do seem to have a little penchant for supporting wars based on lies about weapons of mass destruction.
Piffle. It was the USG and Europe that violated the deal, not Iran. Iran even continued to uphold it for years after Trump pulled out. Iran war supporters kept posting graphs of Iranian enrichment which showed very low levels on enrichment during the deal years. Anyone can easily discover this. Who do you think you're fooling?
After 10 years, they'd be three weeks from a nuclear weapon like they have been for the past 30 years?
It would keep the Palestinians over there.
The only nations suicidal enough to take in Palestinian refugees are white western nations, so anyone who cares about the survival of white western nations should support the creation of a Palestinian state in order to keep Palestinians in Palestine.
Having Jewish border czars force rapfugees into our communities is not suicide. We are being killed.
Since when have either Islamists or Communists ever done either? Segregating them out won't stop them from attacking. You'd need someone else to own the place, either Israel, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, or Jordan.
The Palestinians are trying to stay where they are. That's literally what they are fighting for.
ETA: Trump removed HTS as a designated terrorist organization. Terrorism is fine as long as you support Israel, it seems.
Oh please. This sub collectively ate crow when iran nonsense got defused in less 24 hours. Meanwhile I've seen nothing from this sub justifying giving some sand niggers credibility from a couple of dying nations.
Do you mean that ceasefire that nearly crumbled? As I said then, Iran's nuclear program isn't done. We'll be back at war with them eventually.
I don't even know what you're trying to say here. I'll highlight your use of "sand niggers" anyway. Zionist shills will engage in open racism like this to one audience while also playing the victim of racial discrimination to other audiences. They have a playbook for everyone and hope you don't notice that there are people who say "sand niggers" who have the same agenda as the ADL.
That's an interesting way to put that people were relieved because things did not get even worse.
What?
Defused? People like you think that because dropping bombs and killing people in Iran isn't a big deal to you in your life, you assume that it isn't a big deal to the victims. They were bombed and killed. Their families won't forgive, and they won't forget. You probably also don't understand that blowing people up causes animosity and hatred towards our people. Whites better wake up and get away from these semetic wars before the world takes its anger out on us.
I do not care about the plight of terrorist. Fuck the sand niggers, and their sympathizers(which disappointingly this sub is)
If you think that driving 10 million 'refugees' into Europe is a good thing, you're an Israel First moron of the highest order.
You really shouldn't have a European river in your username when you're striving for our destruction. Name yourself after something American instead, like PeanutAllergy or Fentanyl.
And you sound like quite the terrorist yourself, by the way.