A Palestinian state is relatively unimportant to the US interests compared to a maximally favorable trade agreement with a neighbouring developed country that is orders of magnitude larger and more powerful than Palestine.
Compromising our neighborly trade negations to obtain concessions on Palestine is not in the best interests of US, but it is for the country that does actually neighbor Palestine
My issue with that is that nothing about our negotiations is going to genuinely endanger trade with Canada. However, if Canada insists on supporting terrorism in the ME, then it becomes our problem.
As cucked as the Canucks are, that they would just reverse their stance on Palestine for nothing in return seems the more extraordinary claim than they would try to extract at least some form of concession for their compliance. Given this is happening as part of the trade deal talks, trade terms seem a likely first target.
A Palestinian state is relatively unimportant to the US interests compared to a maximally favorable trade agreement with a neighbouring developed country that is orders of magnitude larger and more powerful than Palestine.
Compromising our neighborly trade negations to obtain concessions on Palestine is not in the best interests of US, but it is for the country that does actually neighbor Palestine
My issue with that is that nothing about our negotiations is going to genuinely endanger trade with Canada. However, if Canada insists on supporting terrorism in the ME, then it becomes our problem.
As cucked as the Canucks are, that they would just reverse their stance on Palestine for nothing in return seems the more extraordinary claim than they would try to extract at least some form of concession for their compliance. Given this is happening as part of the trade deal talks, trade terms seem a likely first target.