It’s all BS. The threat of making Nuclear Weapons can always be used, whereas possessing them isn’t worth it for Iran unless it is under serious threat of total annihilation by a superior or near-pear power (NK, SA, Israel, basically the entire Cold War system).
Do they even have any? 🤔 Deterrence is obvious from a MAD PoV, but it still requires the deterrent to actually exist and not be little more than saber rattling a stick under a coat and claiming it's actually a sword.
I think you don't understand how serious nuclear weapons are. They are a threat to all life, and any country that 1) has nuclear weapons and 2) hasn't signed onto nonproliferation treaties should be bombed into the stone age. We need to be extra serious if they're warmongers or actively genociding anyone too.
Nuclear weapons are such a threat, any country that fulfills those requirements should be considered at war with the US without exception. Even if they are our ally.
has nuclear weapons and 2) hasn't signed onto nonproliferation treaties should be bombed into the stone age.
So, who do you want to start bombing then? Because there are 8 countries confirmed (and almost certainly a 9th country) who have nukes, and only 5 of them have signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
If you start by bombing India then you probably need to go after Pakistan at the same time (or vice versa) but geopolitically they are relatively stable. North Korea has nukes (likely not good nukes, but still nukes) but is definitely not stable. But, if you want an active warmonger who almost certainly has nukes I assume you think we should, as you put it, bomb Israel into the stone age?
Going by the criteria that the US pretends to follow but only does selectively would mean war with Israel, then India, then Pakistan. And that would be much better for our country than war with Iran.
threats everywhere. with folks in charge like israel and their vassal states, knowing their history they would not hesitate to use nukes.
why havent they yet? probably cost-benefit in rebuilding infrastructure.
in gaza they clearly have bombed that area to shit and and in the process of cleaning up and building their own infrastructure there since its nearby and relatively small. And not one other nation in the international community tried to stop them. they just cry in the council halls but let israel do its thing at the end of the day.
Doesn't matter anyway...we've all been dead of Climate Change for like half a century.
No, you alt-right conspiracy theorist. We only died from climate change in 2020.
I died from the tax cuts.
Right?! 🤦🏼♀️
I thought it is "climate catastrophe" now.
It’s all BS. The threat of making Nuclear Weapons can always be used, whereas possessing them isn’t worth it for Iran unless it is under serious threat of total annihilation by a superior or near-pear power (NK, SA, Israel, basically the entire Cold War system).
If Iraq did have WMDs, we never would have invaded them. WMDs are deterrent not a weapon.
Huh. These look a lot like global warming predictions, just with less variety of what they're wrong about.
Shorter timeframes for maximum FUBAR
Someone get an AI to do 'Two Minutes to Midnight' by Iron Maiden but with Netenyahu singing about Iran.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qbRHY1l0vc
[Pre-Chorus]
[Chorus]
Personally, I'm more worried about the Samson Option, and you should be too.
I am aware. As we all should be.
/suicidal death cult strikes again
Dems: Two more weeks to flatten the curve!
MAGA: Two more weeks until patriots take control!
Israel: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
here's a newspaper from 1984
"Khomeinin's atomic bomb enters final stages of production with German assistance"
Shareable source for anyone interested.
https://nationalfile.com/netanyahu-iran-nuclear-predictions/
I feel like I'm Almost Sure this Talk Started Mid 80's. Regardless 35 years of being Thissss Close 🤏, is Getting Real Old. 🥱
Meanwhile. Have We had Access to the Other Agitators Nuclear Arsenal yet? Oh, that's Right. We aren't Allowed to know 😉
Do they even have any? 🤔 Deterrence is obvious from a MAD PoV, but it still requires the deterrent to actually exist and not be little more than saber rattling a stick under a coat and claiming it's actually a sword.
like with anything. at the nation-state level, if something was to be done it'd simply be done and we'd all hear about it by tomorrow.
everything else is just theatre, achieves nothing but psychological manipulation of people.
After seeing this I'm wondering if Iran is actually making nukes or if this is just WMDs in Afghanistan?
The right to bear nuke arms shall not be infringed - 2nd amendment probably
I think you don't understand how serious nuclear weapons are. They are a threat to all life, and any country that 1) has nuclear weapons and 2) hasn't signed onto nonproliferation treaties should be bombed into the stone age. We need to be extra serious if they're warmongers or actively genociding anyone too.
Nuclear weapons are such a threat, any country that fulfills those requirements should be considered at war with the US without exception. Even if they are our ally.
So, who do you want to start bombing then? Because there are 8 countries confirmed (and almost certainly a 9th country) who have nukes, and only 5 of them have signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
If you start by bombing India then you probably need to go after Pakistan at the same time (or vice versa) but geopolitically they are relatively stable. North Korea has nukes (likely not good nukes, but still nukes) but is definitely not stable. But, if you want an active warmonger who almost certainly has nukes I assume you think we should, as you put it, bomb Israel into the stone age?
That's the joke.
Going by the criteria that the US pretends to follow but only does selectively would mean war with Israel, then India, then Pakistan. And that would be much better for our country than war with Iran.
threats everywhere. with folks in charge like israel and their vassal states, knowing their history they would not hesitate to use nukes.
why havent they yet? probably cost-benefit in rebuilding infrastructure.
in gaza they clearly have bombed that area to shit and and in the process of cleaning up and building their own infrastructure there since its nearby and relatively small. And not one other nation in the international community tried to stop them. they just cry in the council halls but let israel do its thing at the end of the day.
Imagine allowing people who mutilate genitals and eat rotten meat access to nuclear weapons.
Cool it with the antisemitism.