“Ruby”… 12 when raped, 13 when police seized her foetus without consent, Cps didn’t even charge him with rape! Released from prison a couple of years later without her knowledge, literally bumped into her in a shop!
It would be funny if it wasn't so utterly galling, the people who helped the Rotherham rapists get away with it are now calling for an end to free speech "for the children."
Ofcom similarly sent a letter to Josh Moon over at Kiwifarms.
Only Null particularly hates Bongs, so he gleefully complied by making it so any UK IP couldn't make it through the cryptopuzzle challenge anti-DDos filter to enter the site.
KF is now inaccessible from the British isles without a VPN.
Josh made an announcement that the notice indicated that any Brit users were "unsafe" to visit the site without opsec because they had a hostile government gone rogue.
IIRC, the Ofcom office sent him a formal reply that his filter blocking actions were sufficient "for now".
If I were a sysadmin that ran a website, I would definitely be putting systems in place such that any visitor from the UK would get a separate, static HTML web page telling the reader that this lecture will be what you get due to the dystopian policies of your government, and until you change your government, this is all you will get.
“protecting the children”
https://x.com/maggieoliveruk/status/1516436918548021248
^^ ex uK police officer states :
“Ruby”… 12 when raped, 13 when police seized her foetus without consent, Cps didn’t even charge him with rape! Released from prison a couple of years later without her knowledge, literally bumped into her in a shop!
CPS is the UK attorney general?
With A FOETUS and only her age - literally the most incompetent lawyer in the world should be able to secure a rape conviction.
Of course the UK can’t…
It would be funny if it wasn't so utterly galling, the people who helped the Rotherham rapists get away with it are now calling for an end to free speech "for the children."
They are going after filesharing sites as well re: ID verification for their users.
Do those really count as separate services?
This is really where it all started. I'm just old enough to remember the furor over Napster.
This one is actually going to piss me off.
It should. They're counting on you doing nothing but impotently seething.
Ofcom similarly sent a letter to Josh Moon over at Kiwifarms.
Only Null particularly hates Bongs, so he gleefully complied by making it so any UK IP couldn't make it through the cryptopuzzle challenge anti-DDos filter to enter the site.
KF is now inaccessible from the British isles without a VPN.
Josh made an announcement that the notice indicated that any Brit users were "unsafe" to visit the site without opsec because they had a hostile government gone rogue.
IIRC, the Ofcom office sent him a formal reply that his filter blocking actions were sufficient "for now".
As if they could do anything to him either way. He should have just said "let them enforce it then."
As I mentioned, Null particularly enjoys watching the Bongs suffer.
Why, look at the time, it is BONG o'clock!
Based?
If I were a sysadmin that ran a website, I would definitely be putting systems in place such that any visitor from the UK would get a separate, static HTML web page telling the reader that this lecture will be what you get due to the dystopian policies of your government, and until you change your government, this is all you will get.
If I ran a website I would just block all IPs from the UK, Israel, and India.
Add China to that list.
Imagine still being concerned about 4chan in 2025.
Any freedom is too much for you.
More proof these people want the state to be Daddy. Supported of course by thirdies and roasties.
Block the britbongs. Solved.
Good. They get what they voted for.