I've seen several people including lawyers talk about it, thanks to that states laws, it's misdemeanour at 'best' even withthe most crooked judge and jury.
I mean they did charge Trump with fraud saying that mar a lago was only worth 12 million. It wouldn’t be a stretch that super leftist Minnesota has trigger laws they can throw at any “undesirables”.
Yes, but this kind of thing burns political capital and requires incredible levels of misconduct, especially when the facts are completely against them. It's like saying "Karmello Anthony won't get charged". Even if they intend to be bigoted and racist, there's shit that just can't be tolerated without completely undoing the legitimacy of the judiciary.
Yes, the judiciary is illegitimating itself, but the institutionalists are trying to preserve it.
A lot of the problems that the Democrats have been having over the last several years are because the radicals are finally starting to seize the reins from the last remaining people who understand the need to move their agendas along with some tiny bit of care. This is bad in the sense that it means they’re doing even more rapid and drastic damage to the country, but it’s also good in that they’re showing their true colors and driving people away. Depending on which factions are in which positions there, it could go either way.
My hope would be maximal political capital and legitimacy burning possible without causing the poor woman any more trouble.
They seem to be trying to go back to the old left style economic focused socialism, but I'm not sure how they are going to do that after basically destroying their relationship with the working class.
You're hopelessly naive or hopelessly retarded if you think they're not trying to force hate speech laws here. When has "muh constitooshun" ever gotten in their way before?
Alex Jones got canceled to the tune of nearly a billion for calling a school shooting a hoax. Rudy Giuliani was disbarred and lawfared into poverty. I repeat. WAKE UP.
The court of (easily swayed via controlled social media) public opinion is all that matters.
Only if she was loud. Their could be a disorderly conduct charge, or a harassment charge, if she was getting the kids face and screaming at the child like this lady, but that's absolutely stretching it at best. And even then, that doesn't seem to be what happened.
Charged with what? Maybe you could throw a Disturbing the Peace charge.
I've seen several people including lawyers talk about it, thanks to that states laws, it's misdemeanour at 'best' even withthe most crooked judge and jury.
Appeal for sure.
I think we should make Juneteenth "Call niggers niggers" day this year.
Which is all just a ploy to get her in a gen pop jail cell for at least one night so the sheboons can tear her to pieces.
I mean they did charge Trump with fraud saying that mar a lago was only worth 12 million. It wouldn’t be a stretch that super leftist Minnesota has trigger laws they can throw at any “undesirables”.
True, ole Tittie James is still trying to get Trump in New York.
Please, no.
Yes, but this kind of thing burns political capital and requires incredible levels of misconduct, especially when the facts are completely against them. It's like saying "Karmello Anthony won't get charged". Even if they intend to be bigoted and racist, there's shit that just can't be tolerated without completely undoing the legitimacy of the judiciary.
Yes, the judiciary is illegitimating itself, but the institutionalists are trying to preserve it.
A lot of the problems that the Democrats have been having over the last several years are because the radicals are finally starting to seize the reins from the last remaining people who understand the need to move their agendas along with some tiny bit of care. This is bad in the sense that it means they’re doing even more rapid and drastic damage to the country, but it’s also good in that they’re showing their true colors and driving people away. Depending on which factions are in which positions there, it could go either way.
My hope would be maximal political capital and legitimacy burning possible without causing the poor woman any more trouble.
They seem to be trying to go back to the old left style economic focused socialism, but I'm not sure how they are going to do that after basically destroying their relationship with the working class.
You're hopelessly naive or hopelessly retarded if you think they're not trying to force hate speech laws here. When has "muh constitooshun" ever gotten in their way before?
WAKE. UP.
Kinda coming in hot there. They can try all they want but until a law is passed you can't be tried for breaking a non-existing law.
Alex Jones got canceled to the tune of nearly a billion for calling a school shooting a hoax. Rudy Giuliani was disbarred and lawfared into poverty. I repeat. WAKE UP.
The court of (easily swayed via controlled social media) public opinion is all that matters.
Can and will. That's one of the main ways laws are created now.
Only if she was loud. Their could be a disorderly conduct charge, or a harassment charge, if she was getting the kids face and screaming at the child like this lady, but that's absolutely stretching it at best. And even then, that doesn't seem to be what happened.