You're being called woke right because you act like a Leftist pushing the literal exact same hyper-partisan, ultra-identity focused, purity spiraling, mass murder edging, terrorism supporting, tribal faggotry that is the definition of the Leftist Intersectionalist lynch mobs.
This is because you are Leftists, but you're not intersectionalist. You're still race communists.
Not you, Telia. You're just a camel fucking mohammedian Qatari shill. You're not a white racist. I wouldn't accuse you of that.
No purity spiral every spirals towards truth. Just towards power.
Someone in a position of power defines what perfect righteousness is, then demands acquiescence to that, then will later change the definition of righteousness as they see fit, and his acolytes will follow with him.
Purely hypothetically, lets pretend the world was taken over by extremely corrupt and evil people, who took hold of the positions of power, a hundred or so years ago. Then, they start exerting greater and greater influence upon all the institutions of society, as they further infiltrate and subvert those institutions, using them to put forth propaganda and lies to brainwash people. The institutions become so corrupt that they now push forth only lies and propaganda, which were able to brainwash entire generations because of their monopoly of control over all mediums of information sharing. Let's also say, purely hypothetically, that a new medium for information sharing is invented (we could call it "the internet"), which lets average people talk to each other outside the confines, control, and censorship of the mainstream media. This new medium allows people to discuss the truth, to spread the truth, person to person. Over time, this discussion of truth wakes more and more people up, not just to the overt lies, but to the small ones, and to the big ones that have been fully ingrained into all of society by this point.
In this purely hypothetical scenario, the brainwashed masses, merely by discussing and spreading the truth, will ipso facto participate in a purity spiral towards truth, because the only things they're disproving and getting rid of are lies and propaganda, as they move back toward the truth, the truths which were abandoned and censored previously as the evil people in power began to exert control over information sharing.
This doesn't necessarily mean that all the posited alternatives are true, but it does mean that the outright lies are being rejected, which necessarily will mean that, purely from a numbers game, more truth will be embraced than not, comparative to the possibility that the people had remained under the control of the propaganda and lies.
There is nothing Gizortnik and the faggots in this image fear more than gentiles having power completely outside of Jewish control and influence. This specifically, is what the "woke right" regime polemic is meant to attack rather than general racism, anti-Semitism, anti-Zionism, etc. Among those kosher cock sucking conservatives, saying that you want power or even want it used for your interests is nearly as controversial as saying "nigger." They want seeking power to be a taboo for the goyim and push for Open Society conservativism.
I think I get what you're trying to say, but that's not really a "spiral." The defining characteristic of a purity spiral is that the circle of acceptable keeps shrinking. The group keeps redefining its membership until there is no group remaining. "You're not really X unless Y," where Y becomes more specific over time.
If there is an objective truth, you can't purity spiral to it because a "spiral" would mean either the definition of truth keeps changing or it can only be known to one person. If what you mean is a spiral-like group behavior that actually stops once it reaches some point, it's not really a purity spiral.
Edit: This is just comments on terminology. Giz is still being a spaz.
Literally no part of that even challenges my argument. As such, I don't have anything to respond to you with.
People don't need purity spirals to find the truth, I guess? That's probably the most relevant thing I can say between what you wrote and what I wrote.
Did i say anything about people not knowing Giz you faggot retard? or did i say "notice the pattern that people who are known to be philosemites and against White nationalism are the ones that use the term "woke right". Can you read or are you blind and brainless? You hold petty grudges against me like you're a woman.
Qatari? What? Why do you think those backwards desert savages have the technology to shill online and why would they bother with such a small, obscure forum as this?
Motherfucker, they are a major funder of terrorism around the globe, have nearly as much influence in the US as Israel and Saudi Arabia, are some of the wealthiest people on Earth, don't pay taxes, and build their massive economy off of slave labor and the US military industrial complex. They are the founders of Al-Jazeera, protect the leadership of Hamas, instituted most of the "islamic charities" which funded Al Qaeda, ISIS, Al-Shabab, Hamas and many others, and have fucking ATMs that you can purchase gold with. Yes, Qatar. I think you must be thinking of Oman, Yemen, or Sudan. The average Qatari is wealthier than you.
Every person in that image (possibly except IMC who says whatever he is paid for) is a rabid Zionist. You could say those exact same words about them, could but won't.
Of the Zionists yes. I don't think Rubin, Peterson, and... uh... woke right guy mathematician.... are Zionists. Rubin's a useful idiot. Peterson, as far as I can tell, just thinks Israel is a good thing. Mathematician is just a liberal.
You're being called woke right because you act like a Leftist pushing the literal exact same hyper-partisan, ultra-identity focused, purity spiraling, mass murder edging, terrorism supporting, tribal faggotry that is the definition of the Leftist Intersectionalist lynch mobs.
This is because you are Leftists, but you're not intersectionalist. You're still race communists.
Not you, Telia. You're just a camel fucking mohammedian Qatari shill. You're not a white racist. I wouldn't accuse you of that.
If we "purity spiral" toward truth, is it wrong, according to you?
No purity spiral every spirals towards truth. Just towards power.
Someone in a position of power defines what perfect righteousness is, then demands acquiescence to that, then will later change the definition of righteousness as they see fit, and his acolytes will follow with him.
The Left do it all the time.
Purely hypothetically, lets pretend the world was taken over by extremely corrupt and evil people, who took hold of the positions of power, a hundred or so years ago. Then, they start exerting greater and greater influence upon all the institutions of society, as they further infiltrate and subvert those institutions, using them to put forth propaganda and lies to brainwash people. The institutions become so corrupt that they now push forth only lies and propaganda, which were able to brainwash entire generations because of their monopoly of control over all mediums of information sharing. Let's also say, purely hypothetically, that a new medium for information sharing is invented (we could call it "the internet"), which lets average people talk to each other outside the confines, control, and censorship of the mainstream media. This new medium allows people to discuss the truth, to spread the truth, person to person. Over time, this discussion of truth wakes more and more people up, not just to the overt lies, but to the small ones, and to the big ones that have been fully ingrained into all of society by this point.
In this purely hypothetical scenario, the brainwashed masses, merely by discussing and spreading the truth, will ipso facto participate in a purity spiral towards truth, because the only things they're disproving and getting rid of are lies and propaganda, as they move back toward the truth, the truths which were abandoned and censored previously as the evil people in power began to exert control over information sharing.
This doesn't necessarily mean that all the posited alternatives are true, but it does mean that the outright lies are being rejected, which necessarily will mean that, purely from a numbers game, more truth will be embraced than not, comparative to the possibility that the people had remained under the control of the propaganda and lies.
There is nothing Gizortnik and the faggots in this image fear more than gentiles having power completely outside of Jewish control and influence. This specifically, is what the "woke right" regime polemic is meant to attack rather than general racism, anti-Semitism, anti-Zionism, etc. Among those kosher cock sucking conservatives, saying that you want power or even want it used for your interests is nearly as controversial as saying "nigger." They want seeking power to be a taboo for the goyim and push for Open Society conservativism.
I think I get what you're trying to say, but that's not really a "spiral." The defining characteristic of a purity spiral is that the circle of acceptable keeps shrinking. The group keeps redefining its membership until there is no group remaining. "You're not really X unless Y," where Y becomes more specific over time.
If there is an objective truth, you can't purity spiral to it because a "spiral" would mean either the definition of truth keeps changing or it can only be known to one person. If what you mean is a spiral-like group behavior that actually stops once it reaches some point, it's not really a purity spiral.
Edit: This is just comments on terminology. Giz is still being a spaz.
Literally no part of that even challenges my argument. As such, I don't have anything to respond to you with.
People don't need purity spirals to find the truth, I guess? That's probably the most relevant thing I can say between what you wrote and what I wrote.
^^^ oh look another guy who hates White nationalism and defends jews that uses the term "woke right".
Are you guys noticing the pattern here?
You are such an interloping newfag it hurts sometimes.
Everyone here already knows Giz.
Did i say anything about people not knowing Giz you faggot retard? or did i say "notice the pattern that people who are known to be philosemites and against White nationalism are the ones that use the term "woke right". Can you read or are you blind and brainless? You hold petty grudges against me like you're a woman.
You're pointing at the village idiot as if it's some revelation when it's really just you announcing your candidacy for the position.
You're an outsider and I don't trust you. Get used to the hostility.
I don't use woke right, pedo-worshiper. I just explain that they are talking about the people you are trying to sell your Islamist apologetics to.
believe it or not jews are hated by many many groups besides just muslims, JIDF
Yeah, but yours is specifically linked to the Quran.
Which Mohammed didn't write anyway. He stole it.
You are either a retarded boomer faggot or a glownigger kike if you believe Qatar has anything to do with this.
Boomers don't know that Qatar exists
Qatari? What? Why do you think those backwards desert savages have the technology to shill online and why would they bother with such a small, obscure forum as this?
Motherfucker, they are a major funder of terrorism around the globe, have nearly as much influence in the US as Israel and Saudi Arabia, are some of the wealthiest people on Earth, don't pay taxes, and build their massive economy off of slave labor and the US military industrial complex. They are the founders of Al-Jazeera, protect the leadership of Hamas, instituted most of the "islamic charities" which funded Al Qaeda, ISIS, Al-Shabab, Hamas and many others, and have fucking ATMs that you can purchase gold with. Yes, Qatar. I think you must be thinking of Oman, Yemen, or Sudan. The average Qatari is wealthier than you.
Probably was thinking Yemenis. But damn, dude, chill.
Sorry, I will chill. Qatar just grinds my gears because they never get called out on their bullshit.
Every person in that image (possibly except IMC who says whatever he is paid for) is a rabid Zionist. You could say those exact same words about them, could but won't.
Of the Zionists yes. I don't think Rubin, Peterson, and... uh... woke right guy mathematician.... are Zionists. Rubin's a useful idiot. Peterson, as far as I can tell, just thinks Israel is a good thing. Mathematician is just a liberal.
They're all Zionists. They all support Israel. They're all hypocrites for doing so while telling Whites not to do identity politics.
Supporting Israel and Zionism aren't the same thing.
That's like calling me an Ethno-Nationalist because I support Ireland.