I mean perspective wise because of HOW wealthy he is, this would be like us giving $1 to impregnate a 7/10.
Which given the current state of western women, I'm finding it hard to justify WHY this is a 'bad thing' as women have been OPENLY treating relationships with men as materialistic, why shouldn't men so the same as just paying for the womb?
That's what I mean, imagine now thanks to the wealth perspective here, that is now with a woman that looks like this, it's $1 and the only child support you may end up paying is something like $2-3 a month, would you?
It's a bad thing because it propagates polygamy. That should say more than enough.
I just saw some guy in the Texas tech industry claim that Elon's true baby count is well above 50 and maybe even above 100. Honestly, stuff like this is enraging
Polygamy would require numerous wives. This is just a rich guy doing what rich guys do, hedging his bets to create heirs to carry his legacy. I wouldn’t call it “moral” but it’s a modern solution to modern women that works instantaneously instead of trying to fix the current state of women, which is frankly impossible. It’s pragmatic, not moral.
Essentially, the rich are doing what the monarchy usually does, hedging bets on who inherits their power after as many a downfall has come thanks to having few to no inheritors..
Solution? The Hindenberg had better chances than Elon's autistic generational project. He's trying to foster an acceptable heir yet has to split his fatherly bonding time between 100 children. Without inventing the 72 hour 24 hour day this is impossible, so he'll end up putting all his eggs in the X AE XE III basket, as he is doing now, and he's back to square one.
Only if you view polygamy as immoral, I only view it as a tool in case there is a LARGE disparity between the numbers of Men compared to Women.
And unfortunately thanks to feminist indoctrination along with certain elements targeting Men's physical health, might be time to ask the question if you prefer 1 strong Man with multiple wives raising kids or lots of weak Men possibly getting a relationship but often not even having kids?
I mean manipulating the entirety of a platform's payouts to pay some meh looking Asian thot to get with you is pretty retarded, even if you personally have the money. He could have just paid her directly, which would be significantly less retarded.
What jumped out at me, too.
An "anonymous source familiar with the matter" probably would have been more reliable and believable in this case.
I mean perspective wise because of HOW wealthy he is, this would be like us giving $1 to impregnate a 7/10.
Which given the current state of western women, I'm finding it hard to justify WHY this is a 'bad thing' as women have been OPENLY treating relationships with men as materialistic, why shouldn't men so the same as just paying for the womb?
$20k would be a bargain even for one of us. The typical cost of a divorce rape is in the mid 6 figures.
Isn't 20k just for her to spread her legs? There'll be child support, too.
That's what I mean, imagine now thanks to the wealth perspective here, that is now with a woman that looks like this, it's $1 and the only child support you may end up paying is something like $2-3 a month, would you?
It's a bad thing because it propagates polygamy. That should say more than enough.
I just saw some guy in the Texas tech industry claim that Elon's true baby count is well above 50 and maybe even above 100. Honestly, stuff like this is enraging
Polygamy would require numerous wives. This is just a rich guy doing what rich guys do, hedging his bets to create heirs to carry his legacy. I wouldn’t call it “moral” but it’s a modern solution to modern women that works instantaneously instead of trying to fix the current state of women, which is frankly impossible. It’s pragmatic, not moral.
Essentially, the rich are doing what the monarchy usually does, hedging bets on who inherits their power after as many a downfall has come thanks to having few to no inheritors..
I’ve know a few millionaires fringing on billionaires and they always say the same thing, it takes one good kid to carry a legacy.
Solution? The Hindenberg had better chances than Elon's autistic generational project. He's trying to foster an acceptable heir yet has to split his fatherly bonding time between 100 children. Without inventing the 72 hour 24 hour day this is impossible, so he'll end up putting all his eggs in the X AE XE III basket, as he is doing now, and he's back to square one.
Only if you view polygamy as immoral, I only view it as a tool in case there is a LARGE disparity between the numbers of Men compared to Women.
And unfortunately thanks to feminist indoctrination along with certain elements targeting Men's physical health, might be time to ask the question if you prefer 1 strong Man with multiple wives raising kids or lots of weak Men possibly getting a relationship but often not even having kids?
Guess what? That "weak man" is YOU. And me. And almost everyone else. Don't go crying about the 80/20 rule and then endorse this stupid bullshit.
This math assumes you’re worth $15million!
And that's STILL a closer grasp of reality on this deal than most of the media, whether would you put the number as?
I mean manipulating the entirety of a platform's payouts to pay some meh looking Asian thot to get with you is pretty retarded, even if you personally have the money. He could have just paid her directly, which would be significantly less retarded.
he really is african american
Only he at takes care of his kids financially...
Who, who, and why should I care?