It's a bad thing because it propagates polygamy. That should say more than enough.
I just saw some guy in the Texas tech industry claim that Elon's true baby count is well above 50 and maybe even above 100. Honestly, stuff like this is enraging
Polygamy would require numerous wives. This is just a rich guy doing what rich guys do, hedging his bets to create heirs to carry his legacy. I wouldn’t call it “moral” but it’s a modern solution to modern women that works instantaneously instead of trying to fix the current state of women, which is frankly impossible. It’s pragmatic, not moral.
Essentially, the rich are doing what the monarchy usually does, hedging bets on who inherits their power after as many a downfall has come thanks to having few to no inheritors..
Solution? The Hindenberg had better chances than Elon's autistic generational project. He's trying to foster an acceptable heir yet has to split his fatherly bonding time between 100 children. Without inventing the 72 hour 24 hour day this is impossible, so he'll end up putting all his eggs in the X AE XE III basket, as he is doing now, and he's back to square one.
Only if you view polygamy as immoral, I only view it as a tool in case there is a LARGE disparity between the numbers of Men compared to Women.
And unfortunately thanks to feminist indoctrination along with certain elements targeting Men's physical health, might be time to ask the question if you prefer 1 strong Man with multiple wives raising kids or lots of weak Men possibly getting a relationship but often not even having kids?
It's a bad thing because it propagates polygamy. That should say more than enough.
I just saw some guy in the Texas tech industry claim that Elon's true baby count is well above 50 and maybe even above 100. Honestly, stuff like this is enraging
Polygamy would require numerous wives. This is just a rich guy doing what rich guys do, hedging his bets to create heirs to carry his legacy. I wouldn’t call it “moral” but it’s a modern solution to modern women that works instantaneously instead of trying to fix the current state of women, which is frankly impossible. It’s pragmatic, not moral.
Essentially, the rich are doing what the monarchy usually does, hedging bets on who inherits their power after as many a downfall has come thanks to having few to no inheritors..
I’ve know a few millionaires fringing on billionaires and they always say the same thing, it takes one good kid to carry a legacy.
Solution? The Hindenberg had better chances than Elon's autistic generational project. He's trying to foster an acceptable heir yet has to split his fatherly bonding time between 100 children. Without inventing the 72 hour 24 hour day this is impossible, so he'll end up putting all his eggs in the X AE XE III basket, as he is doing now, and he's back to square one.
Only if you view polygamy as immoral, I only view it as a tool in case there is a LARGE disparity between the numbers of Men compared to Women.
And unfortunately thanks to feminist indoctrination along with certain elements targeting Men's physical health, might be time to ask the question if you prefer 1 strong Man with multiple wives raising kids or lots of weak Men possibly getting a relationship but often not even having kids?
Guess what? That "weak man" is YOU. And me. And almost everyone else. Don't go crying about the 80/20 rule and then endorse this stupid bullshit.