The Furry scene is infested with faggots. Cute "fursonas" are very appealing to kids, invoking fuzzy cartoon characters and playful fantasy.
The furry community runs cover for all kinds of fetish behavior, including bestiality. It is not cool. There is a huge overlap of dressing up in fur suits with promiscuous homosexual depravity.
Yet these guys hold Furry Conventions and let kids attend.
Hey dude. We heard you like grooming. So we put you in a suit with brushable fur, so you can groom while you groom.
I'm all for sending furries to yiff in hell, but I hope there is an age range attached to this. Because there is a huge difference between a 7 year old acting like an animal and a 15 year old.
A lot of those though just seem like "oops we did away with dress codes because women cried sexism and rape, and now people are wearing fetish gear to school." Many of those examples shouldn't have been allowed already, so the fact that it apparently wasn't mean it was a blanket allowance that started all this.
So once again, women ruin everything and now we need a dozen more laws to vaguely fix it back to how it was before rather than admit to having fucked things up by catering to them.
The only reason we have to write out such obnoxious and litigious specifics for these laws, which we shouldn't have to be writing anyway, is because there are no dads to smack their gross child when they start wearing tails and asking for a litterbox to shit in.
The kids want to behave this way, and too much of "The System" will protect them when they do so. Now we have to play this game of patching a screen door of exceptions to forestall the inevitable "BUT WHAT ABOUT" cavalcade.
Even if there were dads, they're not allowed to enact the discipline necessary to correct this sort of behavior anyways. All of human history recognized the necessity of a father and husband using some amount of physical discipline on his children and wife to correct for errant behavior. We criminalized that, and now we are seeing what happens without it.
What a freaking disgrace that we need laws to enforce humans to act like humans. The absolute pussy state of society to even get us to this point... Makes me sick.
I think this is the wrong approach. You can't legislate kids to stop being weirdos. I think you'd have better luck by allowing open mockery of it. This requires a cultural shift to it being a shameful thing again so that they keep their weirdness hidden from public view. Once you drive it into hiding it stops being a social contagion. I just don't think this sort of heavy handed legislative approach is going to do anything other than backfire and continue to entrench government overreach into every aspect of daily life.
The UK Government is now reviewing terror legislation that will target "lone individuals" - a,k,a, incels - in order to "prevent terrorism and keep the public safe" from "misfits" and "loners". So it turns out the Government is going to legislate not just kids, but everyone, who is a "weirdo".
you'd have better luck by allowing open mockery of it
The Internet enabled them in the first place and they'd still be their fursonas online and at meetups even if they kept it secret at school. Then again making it illegal at school only accomplishes the same.
Adulthood is realizing how dangerous (((movies))) really are - the bully is the good guy and the "quirky, relatable misfit" lost in his own head who's framed as the story's hero is everything wrong with society.
The Furry scene is infested with faggots. Cute "fursonas" are very appealing to kids, invoking fuzzy cartoon characters and playful fantasy.
The furry community runs cover for all kinds of fetish behavior, including bestiality. It is not cool. There is a huge overlap of dressing up in fur suits with promiscuous homosexual depravity.
Yet these guys hold Furry Conventions and let kids attend.
What little I've heard of its earliest origins isn't much better either.
That's racist.
Glad they were so specific that they can lick one another as long as it's for other reasons. /s
Sometimes you just gotta know what someone tastes like. Perfectly reasonable exception to occur in schools.
Depends how the molly hits.
Especially if you suspect someone might taste like a liar.
The teachers were worried about swinging too wide and banning things they personally enjoy by accident.
Will I hear obnoxious words like "furpression" from them now?
I think you mean “fursecution”.
Purrsecution was too on the nose.
I'm all for sending furries to yiff in hell, but I hope there is an age range attached to this. Because there is a huge difference between a 7 year old acting like an animal and a 15 year old.
A lot of those though just seem like "oops we did away with dress codes because women cried sexism and rape, and now people are wearing fetish gear to school." Many of those examples shouldn't have been allowed already, so the fact that it apparently wasn't mean it was a blanket allowance that started all this.
So once again, women ruin everything and now we need a dozen more laws to vaguely fix it back to how it was before rather than admit to having fucked things up by catering to them.
The only reason we have to write out such obnoxious and litigious specifics for these laws, which we shouldn't have to be writing anyway, is because there are no dads to smack their gross child when they start wearing tails and asking for a litterbox to shit in.
The kids want to behave this way, and too much of "The System" will protect them when they do so. Now we have to play this game of patching a screen door of exceptions to forestall the inevitable "BUT WHAT ABOUT" cavalcade.
Even if there were dads, they're not allowed to enact the discipline necessary to correct this sort of behavior anyways. All of human history recognized the necessity of a father and husband using some amount of physical discipline on his children and wife to correct for errant behavior. We criminalized that, and now we are seeing what happens without it.
Brother, get the Heavy Woodchipper.
If this was a better world, CPS would examine these kids for family or online grooming. Throw this people in the wood chipper and get the kid’s help.
That operates under the assumption that CPS ever makes a situation better.
Non human behavior eh?
Does that mean speaking in ebonics and acting like a groid would be banned as well? Or advocating for communism?
The furry community has been allowed to exist and fester for so long that it's plausible there are second generation furries in high school.
I raided with furries on WoW that were already in their 40s/50s in the 2000s.
They could be grandparents by now easily.
Oh, my sweet summer child...it goes back much further than that
What a freaking disgrace that we need laws to enforce humans to act like humans. The absolute pussy state of society to even get us to this point... Makes me sick.
Despite
Not based enough, send them to mental institutions and see how long they keep pretending and keep them for 6 months extra.
Archive
They weren't already?
It would be a lot simpler if they banned all homosexual behaviour instead
I think this is the wrong approach. You can't legislate kids to stop being weirdos. I think you'd have better luck by allowing open mockery of it. This requires a cultural shift to it being a shameful thing again so that they keep their weirdness hidden from public view. Once you drive it into hiding it stops being a social contagion. I just don't think this sort of heavy handed legislative approach is going to do anything other than backfire and continue to entrench government overreach into every aspect of daily life.
The UK Government is now reviewing terror legislation that will target "lone individuals" - a,k,a, incels - in order to "prevent terrorism and keep the public safe" from "misfits" and "loners". So it turns out the Government is going to legislate not just kids, but everyone, who is a "weirdo".
Great, so if you have any kind of mental issues, keep it to yourself.
This won't backfire at all.
The Internet enabled them in the first place and they'd still be their fursonas online and at meetups even if they kept it secret at school. Then again making it illegal at school only accomplishes the same.
Adulthood is realizing how dangerous (((movies))) really are - the bully is the good guy and the "quirky, relatable misfit" lost in his own head who's framed as the story's hero is everything wrong with society.
Yes but you'll notice those are social pressures being applied to those misfits rather than legislative ones.
This appears to be mainly a ban on otherkin, though some weebs and particularly stupid furries are going to be angered by this.
It won't be long into the bill's journey that the "student" and "in schools" part is taken out.