This will kill the top level of college sports if upheld (along with several programs that rely on 'buy games' from top level teams.) You'll see the top teams split to form a new league/organization that just licenses the schools' branding, maybe offers some incentives to take classes at the school associated with your team, but there's no way you're going to convince the people paying players that some women's softball player should get half of what they want to give that QB prospect.
Don't be a fucking liberal. Talk like this is why they were just kicked out of power everywhere. With our lack of masculinity in the west these days, sports are more important than ever.
You're right. Universities should be able to stay afloat with their football programs alone so that when they offer pozzed classes and degrees that aren't worth the paper they're printed on, they can just keep functioning.
Wanting universities to be subject to market forces based on their actual performance as schools. What was I thinking. So liberal /s
Government mandates aren't market forces. This would be like the "market" saying that woman owned businesses should be proportionally profitable with man owned businesses, so profit sharing will be enforced under penalty of law.
It's straight up commie shit, and pretending this is some conservative stance is a joke.
Yeah, government mandates aren't market forces, they don't influence the market at all. That must be why so many people lost their jobs for refusing the jab. That must be why the banks that should have gone under in 2008 were given not just a life raft but a fucking yacht on the taxpayers dime. That must be why businesses fled California when they made stealing legal.
To be clear: I don't like this guidance and I wouldn't support it.
I still think college sports have perverted the role of colleges.
I can have both opinions at the same time. This is bad policy but I'm not going to cry about Tryone and his 1.5 GPA losing his free ride either.
Consider this possibility: Separating profitable sports from schools would potentially be better for elite athletes and force schools to provide students with a worthwhile education to stay viable.
Can women just fuck off for once? When will the government step in and force Only Fans revenue sharing? (I know that isn't a great comparison but oh well)
Nobody besides their parents have any interest in watching a bunch of slow, uncoordinated women play sports. Fucking deal with it.
This isn't entirely in the domain of NIL stuff. This is regarding school revenue sharing. The message is that funds dispersed by the school to students will be counted as "financial assistance," subject to Title IX rules. Third parties paying athletes isn't necessarily affected by this.
I dont care about college sports or womens education. The few men who make it onto these sports teams are already physically gifted and often nigger criminals who have grades faked for them by cuck boomers. The sport of choice for the boomer audience also gives these students brain damage so what good is the education.
This will kill the top level of college sports if upheld (along with several programs that rely on 'buy games' from top level teams.) You'll see the top teams split to form a new league/organization that just licenses the schools' branding, maybe offers some incentives to take classes at the school associated with your team, but there's no way you're going to convince the people paying players that some women's softball player should get half of what they want to give that QB prospect.
Oh no. Universities might have to create academic programs that are of value as their source of revenue.
Don't be a fucking liberal. Talk like this is why they were just kicked out of power everywhere. With our lack of masculinity in the west these days, sports are more important than ever.
You're right. Universities should be able to stay afloat with their football programs alone so that when they offer pozzed classes and degrees that aren't worth the paper they're printed on, they can just keep functioning.
Wanting universities to be subject to market forces based on their actual performance as schools. What was I thinking. So liberal /s
Government mandates aren't market forces. This would be like the "market" saying that woman owned businesses should be proportionally profitable with man owned businesses, so profit sharing will be enforced under penalty of law.
It's straight up commie shit, and pretending this is some conservative stance is a joke.
Yeah, government mandates aren't market forces, they don't influence the market at all. That must be why so many people lost their jobs for refusing the jab. That must be why the banks that should have gone under in 2008 were given not just a life raft but a fucking yacht on the taxpayers dime. That must be why businesses fled California when they made stealing legal.
To be clear: I don't like this guidance and I wouldn't support it.
I still think college sports have perverted the role of colleges.
I can have both opinions at the same time. This is bad policy but I'm not going to cry about Tryone and his 1.5 GPA losing his free ride either.
lol how many jerseys of other men do you own
lol how many swirlies did the big bad jocks give you in high school?
Consider this possibility: Separating profitable sports from schools would potentially be better for elite athletes and force schools to provide students with a worthwhile education to stay viable.
Can women just fuck off for once? When will the government step in and force Only Fans revenue sharing? (I know that isn't a great comparison but oh well)
Nobody besides their parents have any interest in watching a bunch of slow, uncoordinated women play sports. Fucking deal with it.
Narrator: No, they cannot.
Even their girlfriends don’t watch it.
I have a feeling that the colleges are going to find out that this is no longer the official guidance as early as next week.
That's true, there's also the fact it's just guidance not a law or anything
Three days. Nobody cares what these idiots say.
This isn't entirely in the domain of NIL stuff. This is regarding school revenue sharing. The message is that funds dispersed by the school to students will be counted as "financial assistance," subject to Title IX rules. Third parties paying athletes isn't necessarily affected by this.
I dont care about college sports or womens education. The few men who make it onto these sports teams are already physically gifted and often nigger criminals who have grades faked for them by cuck boomers. The sport of choice for the boomer audience also gives these students brain damage so what good is the education.