Attractiveness correlates with IQ. Life isn’t dungeons and dragons. You don’t have to dump intelligence to pump charisma. Attractive people are, on average, more intelligent than unattractive people. The “trade off” between beauty and intelligence is just cope created by ugly people.
And "High IQ just makes you better than everyone else" is just cope made by Jews to pretend the neuroticism and mental illness that it also correlates with is just them being better than everyone. Considering the Psychology field was founded by and ran by Jews for basically its entire existence, that's probably not even a joke entirely.
Correlation is a very specific term to denote that "there is a relationship here somewhere" without saying there is a specific causation happening. That correlation could literally be "higher IQ parents feed their kids healthier meals" or that "Attractive parents have better careers giving their kids more opportunities in school to reach their potential."
Correlation is the same as statistics, it tells you very little but putting it into a sentence lies through implications and simplification.
IQ is a threshold. The fact that 85 IQ blacks can’t run a society doesn’t mean that 105 IQ whites need to hand control of their prosperous nations over to 110 IQ Jews and Asians.
It is, but the fact that Jews and Asians are regularly the top of the list on IQ should tell you that its not as simple as "attractiveness and IQ are correlated, end of." Because both, if you remove the factor of job/money from the equation due to that's coloring effect, will regularly be mid-low on attractiveness scales in most societies.
So the "trade off" cope is likely equally as off base as the "smart people are also hot" one.
In the case of attractive women, I'd wager that, IQ or not, they never had to work as hard to achieve the same results due to being hotter and getting higher marks off that fact. Leaving them in reality dumber despite their capability once that was taken away, even if they could achieve much higher marks if given those tools and experiences.
What is IQ anyway, I think technically its measured in terms of spatial ability's?
The term IQ, or Intelligence Quotient, generally describes a score on a test that rates the subject's cognitive ability as compared to the general population.
Spatial reasoning is the mental transformation of spatial knowledge. >Such transformation is an integral component of everyday cognition, occurring within a variety of domains, such as attention, memory, and language, and across a variety of tasks, spatial and nonspatial alike.
I dont think its a really something that is "inherent" in people as more as something to be learned. Some people do learn much much more quickly and I guess thats what I discern as a true mark of intelligence.
But absolutely beauty correlates to intelligence, you cant typically have both. Again what is beauty, we can define it as a near perfect symmetrical face mixed in with your own personal subjections of what beauty is. What one person finds beautiful, others dont.
I guess if you want to be beautiful you better spend your time making it so. Spend your time looking in the mirror, going to social events, learning the newest fads. And then there is also raw lust, which is more a product of pheromones and subconscious desires that still are a mystery to this day.
Anyway this is the entire premise behind, can a person become a genius through hard work and sheer desire? I believe the answer is yes, others may feel it is no. One thing you will find in common with people like zuckemberg, cant believe i brought that guy up, or any other internet startup, or most inventions. They were done by people who had no friends, no social life to interrupt and get in the way of their mindly pursuits.
Cant say when I think of scientists or programmers, that I think of "beautiful" people lol.
Then the attractive women should continue to get the same grades in remote learning. No, this study makes it apparent that something else is going on with respect to attractive women that isn't true for everyone else.
That does not carry over for women. The inverse appears to be true there because boys start simping by the time they hit puberty and just piles on from there. Their mental growth freezes.
I think there's a cutoff point where the correlation probably inverts. Attractiveness might correlate in the midwit range but geniuses tend to be pretty meh in looks.
A lot of geniuses are perfectly attractive: reasonable bodyfat ratio, good lower back spinal curve, fine neck and arm lengths, great facial symmetry. But a lot of geniuses don't bother with becoming attractive as an additional action, because they don't need to be. So they neglect fashion sense, because a frumpy sweater is easier to wear, or because it's objectively a poor financial decision to "get your nails done" (seriously, a hundred bucks to use a nail file on you and some polish and laquer?!).
Life isn’t dungeons and dragons. You don’t have to dump intelligence to pump charisma
I'm sure there are some people who are, but I've never seen someone who was both attractive and intelligent. Must be quite rare for lightning to strike and for someone to have two qualities that are both not very likely.
Attractive people are, on average, more intelligent than unattractive people.
I'm sure intelligent people take better care of themselves. Which is also why they are less likely to die in any given year.
simple logic it's going to be extraordinarily unlikely.
I'm just going to roll my eyes and walk away from this one because it's got nothing to do with "logic", and at best it would have something to do with "probability," but only if you have a midwit's understanding of probability.
Again, real life isn’t dnd. You don’t lose points in beauty for a higher intelligence score. IQ is often cited as one of the strongest predictors for lifetime earnings. Who do you think hot girls are marrying? What do you think their kids look like?
You don’t lose points in beauty for a higher intelligence score
That wasn't my argument though. It's like saying: you don't lose Nobel Prize points for a higher Miss America score. How likely is it that lightning will strike twice?
Attractiveness correlates with IQ. Life isn’t dungeons and dragons. You don’t have to dump intelligence to pump charisma. Attractive people are, on average, more intelligent than unattractive people. The “trade off” between beauty and intelligence is just cope created by ugly people.
And "High IQ just makes you better than everyone else" is just cope made by Jews to pretend the neuroticism and mental illness that it also correlates with is just them being better than everyone. Considering the Psychology field was founded by and ran by Jews for basically its entire existence, that's probably not even a joke entirely.
Correlation is a very specific term to denote that "there is a relationship here somewhere" without saying there is a specific causation happening. That correlation could literally be "higher IQ parents feed their kids healthier meals" or that "Attractive parents have better careers giving their kids more opportunities in school to reach their potential."
Correlation is the same as statistics, it tells you very little but putting it into a sentence lies through implications and simplification.
IQ is a threshold. The fact that 85 IQ blacks can’t run a society doesn’t mean that 105 IQ whites need to hand control of their prosperous nations over to 110 IQ Jews and Asians.
It is, but the fact that Jews and Asians are regularly the top of the list on IQ should tell you that its not as simple as "attractiveness and IQ are correlated, end of." Because both, if you remove the factor of job/money from the equation due to that's coloring effect, will regularly be mid-low on attractiveness scales in most societies.
So the "trade off" cope is likely equally as off base as the "smart people are also hot" one.
In the case of attractive women, I'd wager that, IQ or not, they never had to work as hard to achieve the same results due to being hotter and getting higher marks off that fact. Leaving them in reality dumber despite their capability once that was taken away, even if they could achieve much higher marks if given those tools and experiences.
What is IQ anyway, I think technically its measured in terms of spatial ability's?
I dont think its a really something that is "inherent" in people as more as something to be learned. Some people do learn much much more quickly and I guess thats what I discern as a true mark of intelligence.
But absolutely beauty correlates to intelligence, you cant typically have both. Again what is beauty, we can define it as a near perfect symmetrical face mixed in with your own personal subjections of what beauty is. What one person finds beautiful, others dont.
I guess if you want to be beautiful you better spend your time making it so. Spend your time looking in the mirror, going to social events, learning the newest fads. And then there is also raw lust, which is more a product of pheromones and subconscious desires that still are a mystery to this day.
Anyway this is the entire premise behind, can a person become a genius through hard work and sheer desire? I believe the answer is yes, others may feel it is no. One thing you will find in common with people like zuckemberg, cant believe i brought that guy up, or any other internet startup, or most inventions. They were done by people who had no friends, no social life to interrupt and get in the way of their mindly pursuits.
Cant say when I think of scientists or programmers, that I think of "beautiful" people lol.
Then the attractive women should continue to get the same grades in remote learning. No, this study makes it apparent that something else is going on with respect to attractive women that isn't true for everyone else.
That does not carry over for women. The inverse appears to be true there because boys start simping by the time they hit puberty and just piles on from there. Their mental growth freezes.
I think there's a cutoff point where the correlation probably inverts. Attractiveness might correlate in the midwit range but geniuses tend to be pretty meh in looks.
Geniuses are definitionally outliers. They have minimal impact here.
A lot of geniuses are perfectly attractive: reasonable bodyfat ratio, good lower back spinal curve, fine neck and arm lengths, great facial symmetry. But a lot of geniuses don't bother with becoming attractive as an additional action, because they don't need to be. So they neglect fashion sense, because a frumpy sweater is easier to wear, or because it's objectively a poor financial decision to "get your nails done" (seriously, a hundred bucks to use a nail file on you and some polish and laquer?!).
I'm sure there are some people who are, but I've never seen someone who was both attractive and intelligent. Must be quite rare for lightning to strike and for someone to have two qualities that are both not very likely.
I'm sure intelligent people take better care of themselves. Which is also why they are less likely to die in any given year.
Have you ever interacted with people outside of the internet? Because it's really not that uncommon.
My AP calculus and physics classmates included my state's Jr. Miss competition winner.
Your criteria for "intelligence" is AP calc & physics classes?
It’s called a proxy, and it functions as a reasonable model.
You can't see people's looks on the internet.
Like I said: I've never seen. There must be some out there, but by simple logic it's going to be extraordinarily unlikely.
That’s his point. Your concept of reality is retarded and wrong, so he’s implying that you don’t get out much.
Holy Missing The Point, Batman.
I'm just going to roll my eyes and walk away from this one because it's got nothing to do with "logic", and at best it would have something to do with "probability," but only if you have a midwit's understanding of probability.
Again, real life isn’t dnd. You don’t lose points in beauty for a higher intelligence score. IQ is often cited as one of the strongest predictors for lifetime earnings. Who do you think hot girls are marrying? What do you think their kids look like?
That wasn't my argument though. It's like saying: you don't lose Nobel Prize points for a higher Miss America score. How likely is it that lightning will strike twice?