Like all dirty fucking whores, she has to keep up that brand recognition.
Much like all the recent "I'm totally retired from porn and against the industry now!" Whores, who still retain their stage names and all the money they earned from the big bad evil porn corps.
Pretty much. no one will recognise her with her actual last name but with Crowders, she gets to keep making oh woe is me posts on X and claim she's a relationship/lifestyle coach
So, you're saying that she's available? A few wrinkles and a few road miles on her, brittle eyes and scratchy voice, but still has the requisite holes?
It's mostly just Mia Khalifa. Most of the other ones I've seen have started uses their real names. Even Eva Lovia, who isn't anti-porn, is using her real name.
Idk I just saw a thing that Lana Roades and Riley Reid are saying the same thing. Some dumbass simp white guy actually married and had a kid with Riley Reid, and now she wants to denounce everything.
This is why I can't help but laugh at married men who brag that they're homeowners. No retard, your wife is a homeowner. You're just the chump she's conned into paying the mortgage, and she can have your ass thrown out on the street on a whim at any time. If there's any confusion on that point a divorce court judge will be happy to clarify things while he's packing your shit in.
haven't you gotten with the times, old man? we're supposed to give up women and accelerate the genocide of our people to make room for the africans who pump out 15 kids each. won't you think of your finances?
Most young whites don't have the money to pump out and maintain kids, along with having to deal with women broken by feminism and socialist policies. You're asking the white male youth to game a system that has every single card stacked against them while giving the minorities all the benefits. Unless violence breaks out and the system collapses, not much is going to change that at this point
It's a severe logical failing of tradcons and oldfucks. A lot of tards not understanding the current system and that Men are not willing to martyr themselves for a society not worth giving back to.
Same problem Japan has had for over a generation now. No incentive. Combination of laws and economics (zombie economy / weak currency) along with mild overpopulation and cultural decay (both female behavior and easy access to sexual release), there's no incentive for men to get hitched and reproduce. The Diet tried throwing money at people to have children, but it's just not working. Globalists are aiming to take advantage of that and slip in immigration.
Kids are as expensive as you make them and there still are good women out there, but you need to search. Congrats on your faggot blackpills though I guess
The mistakes of this society's current state wasn't my parents fault, the current system is screwing them as well. It's the fault of people long dead or on the cusp of death.
I was born during a time where we didn't have rampant illegal invasion and all this other anti-White shit. They had no foresight this shit was going to happen.
if nothing is worth it, everything is fucked, and you're a mistake and any kids you bring into the world would be a mistake, how does that lead to you trying to spread any sort of ideology? why aren't you just blowing your next salary on a lethal hit of heroin and making it out feeling as good as you can, if that is your end goal?
the "severe logical failing" is on your part when you try to pretend that you have all the answers while at the same time insisting your very existence is the wrong answer. worse yet, you specify White people, which means you're either violently suicidal and should be locked up (or given your desire) or you're a non-White trying to tell us not to have kids, which means you're just more subversive, cowardly scum of the earth that'll have to be cleaned up later. which is it?
I'm not an anti-natalist, nor do I do drugs or liquor.
I want a wife and kids, but I look at everything and I don't see it being worth the risk as of right now. The social contract is mostly in ruin, demographics are a destiny that is not being undone, and society is morally fighting the pendulum in different directions. And then the other things I mentioned above. True Men analyze risk and then take the risk if they see or believe to be any benefit to it. Running into things blindly is how you end up dead or destitute. Barring a collapse and rebuild, I personally don't see it worth the risk or the effort.
worse yet, you specify White people
I specify White people because some of you shitheads here are practically demanding every single White person in our "tribe" pop out kids, as if it will save the Western nations. You have no concept of history and racial totalitarianism won't save us. Civilization cycles and it's slowly heading for the downswing, barring a Reformation.
Addendum: I'm not going to stop you from living life the way you want to, but I will confront you on telling others how they should live it.
True Men analyze risk and then take the risk if they see or believe to be any benefit to it
True Men don't decide to lay down and die off because things seem a bit dire. there is no "cost-benefit analysis" when it comes to your bloodline continuing, you either fight tooth and nail to make it happen or you are wiped from history as it is known. i have more concept of history than you seem to, as i know it was filled with people who thought like me who had to navigate the corpses of people who thought like you to bring both me and civilization to fruition.
if you're not an anti-natalist as you say, you should really stop spouting their exact talking points about how it's "risky" and "not worth it". you could replace 'feminism' with 'climate change' 1:1 and stroll into Reddit and nobody would be the wiser. it is obvious by the way you speak that you are depressed, and i hope that one day you come to terms with this fact so you can stop spreading these sophistic coping mechanisms where your blackpills aren't just sadness but rather "truth" about the world that make your ultimately-suicidal ideologies seem rational, and not suicidal but "risk-averse". it's not healthy and it won't help us either from your perspective or mine.
I've figured out the healthiest thing currently is to not post on this forum or forums like this, or even read them, which I was actually doing less but had a relapse as of late.
ultimately-suicidal ideologies
I know damn well that suicide is cowardice and am above that action specifically.
I think we can bridge this gap. It's probably the biggest one on the right besides the JQ and i think it's a completely fair one.
Prepare for overwrought navel gazing.
The right advocates for capital C Civilization and individual dignity which is distinct from "freedom" as the neo-liberals define it. Do what thou wilt is of thr devil and that's been well established.
Civilization depends on and demands healthy families to build itself around. Going volcel undermines the fabric of society thay makes our eventual galactic empire possible.
Human dignity demands thay not be beholden to anybody without compensation that is equitable. Marriage is fundamentally NOT that for men.
So you have a situation where the two core tenants of positive existence are forced into opposition.
I'm one to believe that's by design but whatever.
I'm married, quite happy. Wouldn't change a thing and I fully intent to advise my children not to marry except in very specific circumstances.
The problem for most is that the advice for how to marry is highly unpopular AND something you can NEVER EVER tell anybody especially a woman.
Here are the requirements:
You must marry young
You must marry while poor.
You must marry somebody poorer than you OR someone in a genuinely bad family/personal situation.
I've talked about this before, but you HAVE TO do them. If you miss any, especially 1. Your danger % jumps wicked high.
To me it's a bit like being raised by a single mom. Statistical choices, if you can avoid the worst ones you'll be better off.
They don't want to bridge the gap because they're feminist shills in white nationalist skin suits. Your advice is the best there is if you want to try family life in the West, but it's telling that they're more interested in trying to shame other men into their miserable lifestyle than doing what's necessary to solve the white birth rate problem they pretend to give a shit about.
The point is you cant answer "hey society has been ruined for me, my role has been to suck it up in exchange for greatness and the reward seems to be being eroded"
With "Well the solution is to suck it up even more so we can build a society on the back of your suffering where we can have greatness again"
Sure it might be the best solution but you can't build a movement solely by demanding martyrs.
It's like if they made it so.if you have a white child they execute you. The birthrate would plummet sure, but you can't just demand people do it anyway.
I appreciate your intellectual honesty, and I have no quarrel with actual white nationalists like yourself, especially since I share many (most?) of your views. I'm talking about the obvious feminist LARPers that are using the label as part of their astroturfing. The most charitable view of their bullshit is that they have a "misery loves company" mindset, but they perpetrate so much obvious fuckery in spaces like this that I really have no reason to believe that they're living the lifestyles they claim they are. They've already proven themselves to be dishonest hacks.
The point is you cant answer "hey society has been ruined for me, my role has been to suck it up in exchange for greatness and the reward seems to be being eroded" With "Well the solution is to suck it up even more so we can build a society on the back of your suffering where we can have greatness again"
This 100%. I've always said that the solution is to make so marriage isn't such a bad risk and address all the other ways feminism has fucked shit up. It's telling that the feminist LARPers above are completely uninterested in this solution. It's almost like they don't give a fuck about the birthrate problem at all...
I can respect that reasoning even if I disagree with it. The problem is that this isn't a debate about lifestyles. It's an astroturf operation designed to further the feminist wealth transfer scam. Notice how they're completely uninterested in doing anything that would actually improve white birthrates because that would go against the interests of their feminist masters.
And since men are more on the 'risk/benefit' structure of decision making, less men are getting in relationships as women, predominantly western women indoctrinated by feminism, are too much of a risk than any other alternative.
The only good sign is that the trans crap designed to further hurt men has gone and bit the hand and is REALLY hurting feminists now. Other than that, we got to count on the ones that were lucky enough to marry out of high school or raised in a traditional (either religious or cultural) community to teach their kids the mistake feminism is like communism.
Reminded me of that one impractical jokers segment where one of the dude goes to a feminist debate and say that all famous/rich women got there because of a famous/rich man (father or husband). Like michael obama being a somebody because hussein obama became president.
Just spinning my thumbs waiting for the inevitable Matt Walsh divorce announcement.
Incoming take with no evidence but intuition: I think leftist women deliberately organize and carry out social engineering attacks on the spouses of high profile conservative men in order to turn them against their husbands. I wonder who Hillary's most recent friends are.
Notice how she's still using his last name despite claiming he was abusive
Like all dirty fucking whores, she has to keep up that brand recognition.
Much like all the recent "I'm totally retired from porn and against the industry now!" Whores, who still retain their stage names and all the money they earned from the big bad evil porn corps.
Pretty much. no one will recognise her with her actual last name but with Crowders, she gets to keep making oh woe is me posts on X and claim she's a relationship/lifestyle coach
So, you're saying that she's available? A few wrinkles and a few road miles on her, brittle eyes and scratchy voice, but still has the requisite holes?
It's mostly just Mia Khalifa. Most of the other ones I've seen have started uses their real names. Even Eva Lovia, who isn't anti-porn, is using her real name.
Goes to show how bullshit Mia is.
Idk I just saw a thing that Lana Roades and Riley Reid are saying the same thing. Some dumbass simp white guy actually married and had a kid with Riley Reid, and now she wants to denounce everything.
Don't gatekeep Hilary, let us know how you earned so much money!!
This is why I can't help but laugh at married men who brag that they're homeowners. No retard, your wife is a homeowner. You're just the chump she's conned into paying the mortgage, and she can have your ass thrown out on the street on a whim at any time. If there's any confusion on that point a divorce court judge will be happy to clarify things while he's packing your shit in.
You're laughing at married men? Lmao. Ok loser. I'll continue to take the risk while enjoying an awesome family life for the last 15 years.
haven't you gotten with the times, old man? we're supposed to give up women and accelerate the genocide of our people to make room for the africans who pump out 15 kids each. won't you think of your finances?
Most young whites don't have the money to pump out and maintain kids, along with having to deal with women broken by feminism and socialist policies. You're asking the white male youth to game a system that has every single card stacked against them while giving the minorities all the benefits. Unless violence breaks out and the system collapses, not much is going to change that at this point
It's a severe logical failing of tradcons and oldfucks. A lot of tards not understanding the current system and that Men are not willing to martyr themselves for a society not worth giving back to.
People respond to incentives.
This is somehow a concept a lot of people refuse to understand.
Same problem Japan has had for over a generation now. No incentive. Combination of laws and economics (zombie economy / weak currency) along with mild overpopulation and cultural decay (both female behavior and easy access to sexual release), there's no incentive for men to get hitched and reproduce. The Diet tried throwing money at people to have children, but it's just not working. Globalists are aiming to take advantage of that and slip in immigration.
Kids are as expensive as you make them and there still are good women out there, but you need to search. Congrats on your faggot blackpills though I guess
Why bring white kids into the world if the system will let the niggers slaughter them anyway? :)
Bring them into the world so they can help out on the day of the rope.
One of my concerns is there being enough willing Whites around for it.
I have some faith that at least a few minorities will be on our side if we move to remove the Marxists.
if your parents made a mistake, why not undo it and spare them the shame?
The mistakes of this society's current state wasn't my parents fault, the current system is screwing them as well. It's the fault of people long dead or on the cusp of death.
I was born during a time where we didn't have rampant illegal invasion and all this other anti-White shit. They had no foresight this shit was going to happen.
if nothing is worth it, everything is fucked, and you're a mistake and any kids you bring into the world would be a mistake, how does that lead to you trying to spread any sort of ideology? why aren't you just blowing your next salary on a lethal hit of heroin and making it out feeling as good as you can, if that is your end goal?
the "severe logical failing" is on your part when you try to pretend that you have all the answers while at the same time insisting your very existence is the wrong answer. worse yet, you specify White people, which means you're either violently suicidal and should be locked up (or given your desire) or you're a non-White trying to tell us not to have kids, which means you're just more subversive, cowardly scum of the earth that'll have to be cleaned up later. which is it?
I'm not an anti-natalist, nor do I do drugs or liquor.
I want a wife and kids, but I look at everything and I don't see it being worth the risk as of right now. The social contract is mostly in ruin, demographics are a destiny that is not being undone, and society is morally fighting the pendulum in different directions. And then the other things I mentioned above. True Men analyze risk and then take the risk if they see or believe to be any benefit to it. Running into things blindly is how you end up dead or destitute. Barring a collapse and rebuild, I personally don't see it worth the risk or the effort.
I specify White people because some of you shitheads here are practically demanding every single White person in our "tribe" pop out kids, as if it will save the Western nations. You have no concept of history and racial totalitarianism won't save us. Civilization cycles and it's slowly heading for the downswing, barring a Reformation.
Addendum: I'm not going to stop you from living life the way you want to, but I will confront you on telling others how they should live it.
How do you evaluate the risk of growing old alone with no family around you?
True Men don't decide to lay down and die off because things seem a bit dire. there is no "cost-benefit analysis" when it comes to your bloodline continuing, you either fight tooth and nail to make it happen or you are wiped from history as it is known. i have more concept of history than you seem to, as i know it was filled with people who thought like me who had to navigate the corpses of people who thought like you to bring both me and civilization to fruition.
if you're not an anti-natalist as you say, you should really stop spouting their exact talking points about how it's "risky" and "not worth it". you could replace 'feminism' with 'climate change' 1:1 and stroll into Reddit and nobody would be the wiser. it is obvious by the way you speak that you are depressed, and i hope that one day you come to terms with this fact so you can stop spreading these sophistic coping mechanisms where your blackpills aren't just sadness but rather "truth" about the world that make your ultimately-suicidal ideologies seem rational, and not suicidal but "risk-averse". it's not healthy and it won't help us either from your perspective or mine.
I've figured out the healthiest thing currently is to not post on this forum or forums like this, or even read them, which I was actually doing less but had a relapse as of late.
I know damn well that suicide is cowardice and am above that action specifically.
I think we can bridge this gap. It's probably the biggest one on the right besides the JQ and i think it's a completely fair one.
Prepare for overwrought navel gazing.
The right advocates for capital C Civilization and individual dignity which is distinct from "freedom" as the neo-liberals define it. Do what thou wilt is of thr devil and that's been well established.
Civilization depends on and demands healthy families to build itself around. Going volcel undermines the fabric of society thay makes our eventual galactic empire possible.
Human dignity demands thay not be beholden to anybody without compensation that is equitable. Marriage is fundamentally NOT that for men.
So you have a situation where the two core tenants of positive existence are forced into opposition.
I'm one to believe that's by design but whatever.
I'm married, quite happy. Wouldn't change a thing and I fully intent to advise my children not to marry except in very specific circumstances.
The problem for most is that the advice for how to marry is highly unpopular AND something you can NEVER EVER tell anybody especially a woman.
Here are the requirements:
I've talked about this before, but you HAVE TO do them. If you miss any, especially 1. Your danger % jumps wicked high.
To me it's a bit like being raised by a single mom. Statistical choices, if you can avoid the worst ones you'll be better off.
They don't want to bridge the gap because they're feminist shills in white nationalist skin suits. Your advice is the best there is if you want to try family life in the West, but it's telling that they're more interested in trying to shame other men into their miserable lifestyle than doing what's necessary to solve the white birth rate problem they pretend to give a shit about.
I mean. White nationalist present right here.
The point is you cant answer "hey society has been ruined for me, my role has been to suck it up in exchange for greatness and the reward seems to be being eroded"
With "Well the solution is to suck it up even more so we can build a society on the back of your suffering where we can have greatness again"
Sure it might be the best solution but you can't build a movement solely by demanding martyrs.
It's like if they made it so.if you have a white child they execute you. The birthrate would plummet sure, but you can't just demand people do it anyway.
I appreciate your intellectual honesty, and I have no quarrel with actual white nationalists like yourself, especially since I share many (most?) of your views. I'm talking about the obvious feminist LARPers that are using the label as part of their astroturfing. The most charitable view of their bullshit is that they have a "misery loves company" mindset, but they perpetrate so much obvious fuckery in spaces like this that I really have no reason to believe that they're living the lifestyles they claim they are. They've already proven themselves to be dishonest hacks.
This 100%. I've always said that the solution is to make so marriage isn't such a bad risk and address all the other ways feminism has fucked shit up. It's telling that the feminist LARPers above are completely uninterested in this solution. It's almost like they don't give a fuck about the birthrate problem at all...
he’s right you know, go through a divorce and see just how much is actually yours
My perspective is generally that a marriage may be a huge risk for potential unhappiness, but growing old alone with no family is an even bigger one.
I can respect that reasoning even if I disagree with it. The problem is that this isn't a debate about lifestyles. It's an astroturf operation designed to further the feminist wealth transfer scam. Notice how they're completely uninterested in doing anything that would actually improve white birthrates because that would go against the interests of their feminist masters.
I sleep in a race car
Do you?
And since men are more on the 'risk/benefit' structure of decision making, less men are getting in relationships as women, predominantly western women indoctrinated by feminism, are too much of a risk than any other alternative.
The only good sign is that the trans crap designed to further hurt men has gone and bit the hand and is REALLY hurting feminists now. Other than that, we got to count on the ones that were lucky enough to marry out of high school or raised in a traditional (either religious or cultural) community to teach their kids the mistake feminism is like communism.
I read this as Hilary Clinton at first. Now I'm wondering who tf is Hilary Crowder...
Steven Crowders ex wife. Last I heard , her and her pops and lawyers were squeezing for reputation ruin and that sweet sweet podcast money
That got settled already afaik
Reminded me of that one impractical jokers segment where one of the dude goes to a feminist debate and say that all famous/rich women got there because of a famous/rich man (father or husband). Like michael obama being a somebody because hussein obama became president.
Just spinning my thumbs waiting for the inevitable Matt Walsh divorce announcement.
Incoming take with no evidence but intuition: I think leftist women deliberately organize and carry out social engineering attacks on the spouses of high profile conservative men in order to turn them against their husbands. I wonder who Hillary's most recent friends are.