The right knows how to budget and make films a niche audience WILL see compared to the left's 'general audience' scam.
I wish they actually did
All of the daily wire's other stuff is crap. Its just the occasional doco or doco-drama in the case of that trafficking one that gets some traction.
Just crowdfund prince of egypt part II the spiritual successor, do samson or david or something. Would be epic. But no, we get daily wire+ with lady ballers and Mr birchum
Walsh gets a bad rap around here because of his character's view of videogames. Yes, I said character, because he is playing one.
He isn't a commentator, but a comedian like Andy Kaufman crossed with Archie Bunker. He uses his comedy to convey his political views most of the time, but there are cases where staying in character trumps his messaging. Hence, his "views" on videogames, where it wouldn't make sense for a boomer curmudgeon character to be in favor of them.
The guy is brilliant and absolutely hilarious, but most around here are too triggered by his trolling to see it.
I don't think being the right's version of Stephen Colbert would be the flex you imagine it to be. Are you saying his views aren't sincere? If it's all satire and he doesn't mean anything he says, fuck em. And Andy Kaufman is only liked by a niche audience desperate to view themselves as quirky geniuses.
I think the issue is that his attacks on gamers are largely indistinguishable from the feminists', not that he doesn't like video games. Him and his butt buddy Joel Berry were calling us incels at one point. If he (or his character as you claim) just didn't like video games and simply dismissed them as a waste of time I don't think people here would give a shit. As it stands he's a retarded tradcuck who's useful on certain topics, with troons and CRT being the big ones. But the minute he wanders into lifestyle discussions he exposes his extra chromosome. I wish he'd stick to things like this because it is a net positive. I'll also add that I really don't like how him and his team treated Better Bachelor when he won their Jeremy's Razors contest.
I don't like Walsh because he's the millennial spiritual successor of a neo-con boomer, a complete shabbos goy, and often wrong about things beyond his ken (vidya, Christianity, 'the dissident right'). A perfect example of this is his blatant obfuscation about the pre-Money era transgenderist movement starting with Hirschfeld. When confronted, he merely said he was "a German" instead of a Bolshevik Jew, but sure, he's just pretending to be retarded.
Or maybe we aren't interested in seeing another "character" who plays "nose on nose off" like John Stewart to dodge around criticism.
But if you are correct when are we supposed to take him seriously? Does he come with a manual about when its a joke or when its sincere political opinions? Or is just just when he gets pushback that it suddenly "just comedy bro" for him to say the exact same lines our enemies do?
We aren't always the niche audience, plus they budgeted well enough that unlike the major studios, they don't need to layoff and sell assets after a flop.
Same happened with that child trafficking film
The right knows how to budget and make films a niche audience WILL see compared to the left's 'general audience' scam.
I wish they actually did
All of the daily wire's other stuff is crap. Its just the occasional doco or doco-drama in the case of that trafficking one that gets some traction.
Just crowdfund prince of egypt part II the spiritual successor, do samson or david or something. Would be epic. But no, we get daily wire+ with lady ballers and Mr birchum
Most of everything is crap. That's just life.
I don't even particularly like Daily Wire or Matt Walsh, but What is a Woman was brilliant and Am I Racist looks to be another solid hit.
Walsh gets a bad rap around here because of his character's view of videogames. Yes, I said character, because he is playing one.
He isn't a commentator, but a comedian like Andy Kaufman crossed with Archie Bunker. He uses his comedy to convey his political views most of the time, but there are cases where staying in character trumps his messaging. Hence, his "views" on videogames, where it wouldn't make sense for a boomer curmudgeon character to be in favor of them.
The guy is brilliant and absolutely hilarious, but most around here are too triggered by his trolling to see it.
"Pretending to be a faggot" isn't any better a defense than "pretending to be retarded" is.
I don't think being the right's version of Stephen Colbert would be the flex you imagine it to be. Are you saying his views aren't sincere? If it's all satire and he doesn't mean anything he says, fuck em. And Andy Kaufman is only liked by a niche audience desperate to view themselves as quirky geniuses.
I think the issue is that his attacks on gamers are largely indistinguishable from the feminists', not that he doesn't like video games. Him and his butt buddy Joel Berry were calling us incels at one point. If he (or his character as you claim) just didn't like video games and simply dismissed them as a waste of time I don't think people here would give a shit. As it stands he's a retarded tradcuck who's useful on certain topics, with troons and CRT being the big ones. But the minute he wanders into lifestyle discussions he exposes his extra chromosome. I wish he'd stick to things like this because it is a net positive. I'll also add that I really don't like how him and his team treated Better Bachelor when he won their Jeremy's Razors contest.
I don't like Walsh because he's the millennial spiritual successor of a neo-con boomer, a complete shabbos goy, and often wrong about things beyond his ken (vidya, Christianity, 'the dissident right'). A perfect example of this is his blatant obfuscation about the pre-Money era transgenderist movement starting with Hirschfeld. When confronted, he merely said he was "a German" instead of a Bolshevik Jew, but sure, he's just pretending to be retarded.
Or maybe we aren't interested in seeing another "character" who plays "nose on nose off" like John Stewart to dodge around criticism.
But if you are correct when are we supposed to take him seriously? Does he come with a manual about when its a joke or when its sincere political opinions? Or is just just when he gets pushback that it suddenly "just comedy bro" for him to say the exact same lines our enemies do?
I thought Mr. Birchum was that other neo-con Family Guy knockoff. The right needs to stop playing with the left's hand-me-downs.
We aren't always the niche audience, plus they budgeted well enough that unlike the major studios, they don't need to layoff and sell assets after a flop.
I could have sworn Joseph King of Dreams was marketed as "Prince of Egypt II", but I can't find old posters or commercials of it.