The right knows how to budget and make films a niche audience WILL see compared to the left's 'general audience' scam.
I wish they actually did
All of the daily wire's other stuff is crap. Its just the occasional doco or doco-drama in the case of that trafficking one that gets some traction.
Just crowdfund prince of egypt part II the spiritual successor, do samson or david or something. Would be epic. But no, we get daily wire+ with lady ballers and Mr birchum
Walsh gets a bad rap around here because of his character's view of videogames. Yes, I said character, because he is playing one.
He isn't a commentator, but a comedian like Andy Kaufman crossed with Archie Bunker. He uses his comedy to convey his political views most of the time, but there are cases where staying in character trumps his messaging. Hence, his "views" on videogames, where it wouldn't make sense for a boomer curmudgeon character to be in favor of them.
The guy is brilliant and absolutely hilarious, but most around here are too triggered by his trolling to see it.
I don't think being the right's version of Stephen Colbert would be the flex you imagine it to be. Are you saying his views aren't sincere? If it's all satire and he doesn't mean anything he says, fuck em. And Andy Kaufman is only liked by a niche audience desperate to view themselves as quirky geniuses.
Wrt to the Better Bachelor situation I'd argue that keeping your fucking word is a conservative value, and it's one of the few ways a real conservative walks the walk since letting retard activists tell you how to live your life is a leftist thing. That's why we're in favor of freedom to contract and okay with the enforcement of contracts despite our general suspicion of government power. I don't think cancelling the interview was a breach of contract to be clear, but being dishonest weasels about the whole thing was a very leftist thing to do. Cancelling the interview itself was a pussy move as well, which I point out because these clowns love to talk down to manosphere guys about masculinity. I'd say this is just another piece of evidence that they're LARPing grifters.
I'll also point that these guys are marriage shills, just like Crowder was before he got divorce raped. Going back to the idea of contracts, a real conservative would recognize that signing a contract that the other party is financially incentivized to break is a retard move. These guys would never try to shame a company into investing in a corrupt shithole where they can be robbed of their investment with no legal recourse. Yet they try to shame men into entering contracts with women that corrupt divorce courts financially incentivize women to break. It's very feminist of them.
I'd say his views are sincere enough, but he understands that it's his job. Political commentary is how he makes money. It's literally his career. So he does what keeps his paying customers happy. In the end it doesn't matter if he really believes as far as he says, but his boomer DW customers who pay the bills want to watch someone who appears to believe that way, so that's what he provides. I'm sure he doesn't like video games, but his real disdain might be a 4 out of 10, while the paying customer wants to see 10 out of 10 hatred for video games, so that's what he gives them.
To me this is a distinction without a difference. I didn’t care whether Anita Sarkeesian was doing what she did purely as a money grift and didn’t hate video games at all, or if she merely disliked them but played it up, or if she was/is a true believer.
The damage is the same whether or not the human garbage that espoused it was sincere.
You are just calling him a grifter over and over in more economic words, which says he isn't sincere in the slightest. Exaggeration is a form of insincerity too, and its probably the most common one among all political grifters who turn "this 300 years cycle is moving a fraction faster" into "THE WORLD WILL FLOOD NEXT YEAR."
I think the issue is that his attacks on gamers are largely indistinguishable from the feminists', not that he doesn't like video games. Him and his butt buddy Joel Berry were calling us incels at one point. If he (or his character as you claim) just didn't like video games and simply dismissed them as a waste of time I don't think people here would give a shit. As it stands he's a retarded tradcuck who's useful on certain topics, with troons and CRT being the big ones. But the minute he wanders into lifestyle discussions he exposes his extra chromosome. I wish he'd stick to things like this because it is a net positive. I'll also add that I really don't like how him and his team treated Better Bachelor when he won their Jeremy's Razors contest.
I don't like Walsh because he's the millennial spiritual successor of a neo-con boomer, a complete shabbos goy, and often wrong about things beyond his ken (vidya, Christianity, 'the dissident right'). A perfect example of this is his blatant obfuscation about the pre-Money era transgenderist movement starting with Hirschfeld. When confronted, he merely said he was "a German" instead of a Bolshevik Jew, but sure, he's just pretending to be retarded.
Or maybe we aren't interested in seeing another "character" who plays "nose on nose off" like John Stewart to dodge around criticism.
But if you are correct when are we supposed to take him seriously? Does he come with a manual about when its a joke or when its sincere political opinions? Or is just just when he gets pushback that it suddenly "just comedy bro" for him to say the exact same lines our enemies do?
We aren't always the niche audience, plus they budgeted well enough that unlike the major studios, they don't need to layoff and sell assets after a flop.
Bragging that you did better than arguably the biggest flop in hollywood history isn't that much of an accomplishment tbh. Its like bragging that your game has more players than Concord.
I would agree if we were talking about profit AKA net earnings, but we are talking about gross earnings here. It's always noteworthy when an indie out grosses AAA products, since it barely ever happens.
One crew member recalled, "He would often show up in the mornings before these big sequences and because no plan had been put in place, and because he wouldn't allow his collaborators to put a plan in place, he would often just sit in his trailer for hours on end, wouldn't talk to anybody, was often smoking marijuana ... And then he'd come out and whip up something that didn't make sense, and that didn't follow anything anybody had spoken about or anything that was on the page, and we'd all just go along with it
Looks like Coppola went waaaaay up his own ass to make MegaFlopolis.
Same happened with that child trafficking film
The right knows how to budget and make films a niche audience WILL see compared to the left's 'general audience' scam.
I wish they actually did
All of the daily wire's other stuff is crap. Its just the occasional doco or doco-drama in the case of that trafficking one that gets some traction.
Just crowdfund prince of egypt part II the spiritual successor, do samson or david or something. Would be epic. But no, we get daily wire+ with lady ballers and Mr birchum
Most of everything is crap. That's just life.
I don't even particularly like Daily Wire or Matt Walsh, but What is a Woman was brilliant and Am I Racist looks to be another solid hit.
Walsh gets a bad rap around here because of his character's view of videogames. Yes, I said character, because he is playing one.
He isn't a commentator, but a comedian like Andy Kaufman crossed with Archie Bunker. He uses his comedy to convey his political views most of the time, but there are cases where staying in character trumps his messaging. Hence, his "views" on videogames, where it wouldn't make sense for a boomer curmudgeon character to be in favor of them.
The guy is brilliant and absolutely hilarious, but most around here are too triggered by his trolling to see it.
"Pretending to be a faggot" isn't any better a defense than "pretending to be retarded" is.
Case in point.
If you're snookered by the likes of Walsh and the Daily Wire I'd be more worried if you approved of my opinions.
I don't think being the right's version of Stephen Colbert would be the flex you imagine it to be. Are you saying his views aren't sincere? If it's all satire and he doesn't mean anything he says, fuck em. And Andy Kaufman is only liked by a niche audience desperate to view themselves as quirky geniuses.
The DW's true purpose is to attempt to define the boundaries of acceptable conservatism and police anything straying outside of them.
Wrt to the Better Bachelor situation I'd argue that keeping your fucking word is a conservative value, and it's one of the few ways a real conservative walks the walk since letting retard activists tell you how to live your life is a leftist thing. That's why we're in favor of freedom to contract and okay with the enforcement of contracts despite our general suspicion of government power. I don't think cancelling the interview was a breach of contract to be clear, but being dishonest weasels about the whole thing was a very leftist thing to do. Cancelling the interview itself was a pussy move as well, which I point out because these clowns love to talk down to manosphere guys about masculinity. I'd say this is just another piece of evidence that they're LARPing grifters.
I'll also point that these guys are marriage shills, just like Crowder was before he got divorce raped. Going back to the idea of contracts, a real conservative would recognize that signing a contract that the other party is financially incentivized to break is a retard move. These guys would never try to shame a company into investing in a corrupt shithole where they can be robbed of their investment with no legal recourse. Yet they try to shame men into entering contracts with women that corrupt divorce courts financially incentivize women to break. It's very feminist of them.
To me this is a distinction without a difference. I didn’t care whether Anita Sarkeesian was doing what she did purely as a money grift and didn’t hate video games at all, or if she merely disliked them but played it up, or if she was/is a true believer.
The damage is the same whether or not the human garbage that espoused it was sincere.
Calling Anita human is quite a stretch.
You are just calling him a grifter over and over in more economic words, which says he isn't sincere in the slightest. Exaggeration is a form of insincerity too, and its probably the most common one among all political grifters who turn "this 300 years cycle is moving a fraction faster" into "THE WORLD WILL FLOOD NEXT YEAR."
I think the issue is that his attacks on gamers are largely indistinguishable from the feminists', not that he doesn't like video games. Him and his butt buddy Joel Berry were calling us incels at one point. If he (or his character as you claim) just didn't like video games and simply dismissed them as a waste of time I don't think people here would give a shit. As it stands he's a retarded tradcuck who's useful on certain topics, with troons and CRT being the big ones. But the minute he wanders into lifestyle discussions he exposes his extra chromosome. I wish he'd stick to things like this because it is a net positive. I'll also add that I really don't like how him and his team treated Better Bachelor when he won their Jeremy's Razors contest.
To say nothing of him swearing fealty to that little goblin Shapiro.
I don't like Walsh because he's the millennial spiritual successor of a neo-con boomer, a complete shabbos goy, and often wrong about things beyond his ken (vidya, Christianity, 'the dissident right'). A perfect example of this is his blatant obfuscation about the pre-Money era transgenderist movement starting with Hirschfeld. When confronted, he merely said he was "a German" instead of a Bolshevik Jew, but sure, he's just pretending to be retarded.
Or maybe we aren't interested in seeing another "character" who plays "nose on nose off" like John Stewart to dodge around criticism.
But if you are correct when are we supposed to take him seriously? Does he come with a manual about when its a joke or when its sincere political opinions? Or is just just when he gets pushback that it suddenly "just comedy bro" for him to say the exact same lines our enemies do?
kek
I thought Mr. Birchum was that other neo-con Family Guy knockoff. The right needs to stop playing with the left's hand-me-downs.
We aren't always the niche audience, plus they budgeted well enough that unlike the major studios, they don't need to layoff and sell assets after a flop.
I could have sworn Joseph King of Dreams was marketed as "Prince of Egypt II", but I can't find old posters or commercials of it.
Bragging that you did better than arguably the biggest flop in hollywood history isn't that much of an accomplishment tbh. Its like bragging that your game has more players than Concord.
I would agree if we were talking about profit AKA net earnings, but we are talking about gross earnings here. It's always noteworthy when an indie out grosses AAA products, since it barely ever happens.
Looks like Coppola went waaaaay up his own ass to make MegaFlopolis.
The Frances Ford Coppola that took and kept the known kid molesting director Victor Salva under his wing, supporting him and calling him a protege?
My feelings on Walsh aside I'm glad this movie exists and I'm glad it's seeing success. Every single bullet we can use helps in the long run.
I saw megalopolis.I failed to see how it was anti trump.It was a shit movie though
Death of the author until the author says something the left agrees with.