They are just being obtuse. Everyone knows when you talk about an Asian, you aren't talking about some Arabian, Israeli, Indian, Russians, or whatever. Just like when you say someone is American, they are from the United States of America. Yeah, there's Canada, Mexico, all the places in South America, etc. Someone from Brazil is Brazilian, someone from the USA is American.
EU governments use "asian" as a way to hide criminal identities and obfuscate crime stats, to make it harder for White people to identify who is hurting us. The U.S. government does the same thing by grouping Hispanic people in with "White" in crime stats.
Hispanic is as worthless a descriptive term as Asian is, in the context mentioned in this thread. Hispanics can be of German, Italian, Portuguese or Spanish descent from countries like Chile or Argentina, as white as snowflakes. Or, can be the Indians of the area, the tribal Mongoloids/ "Asians" who wandered around before the coming of Europeans. Or, they can be the mixed super dark Africans that plague places like Brazil.
in genotype clustering, at the highest level, it's caucasoid, negroid, and mongoloid.
Js and most middle easterners at that abstraction level are mostly caucasoid, although the moors made it so there's a fair bit of negroid blood mixed into some arab countries.
debates after that largely focus on zoom levels of haplotype clusters. for example, some classifications break out australoids, while others don't. zooming in further, caucasoids are primarily some mish mash of aryans, ottomons, saxons, semites, hamites, and then some.
where it starts to get really fucked is that science largely considers wolves, coyotes, dogs, and dingos to either be different species or subspecies of each other... and the haplotype variance is greater between the 3 major human races than it is of these 4 types of animals.
The most modern genetic clustering research seems to break out australoids (Australian aborigines and Papua New Guineans) into their own group as well as whatever you call the group of native Americans/first nations/etc.
But interestingly, sub Saharan Africans are more distinct from all other human populations than all of the other populations are from each other.
yeah, sub saharan africans expose the coyote problem the most. if coyotes are a different species, sub saharan africans are certainly a different species. the genotyping is nuts... we're talking 70x greater distance in genes of sub saharan africans to other homo sapiens vs coyotes to wolves.
They do it to themselves and can't seem to resist meddling. Perhaps they see the western countries they've already sent down a potential death spiral won't be there for them long term and want to jump ship
As current clown world indicates, there is no bottom depth to clown world, only more honking. Japan is still mostly homogeneous, they can always be honked further by the honkers.
Vladivostok, a stones throw from north Korea is more white than most cities in Western Europe.
Really crazy to define a race on a continent name as massive as Asia. I think the older term "Oriental" or "mongoloid " was probably more descriptive, but were memory holed long ago.
Technically incorrect, regarding Asia Minor. Asia Minor was/is just the Anatolian Peninsula. The rest would've been different things at different times, but "the Levant" is a pretty good catch-all.
Works for me! The Levantine peoples or the more Northern Anatolians all fit the bill better than Asians. Even the Silk Road walkers were more likely to be called Asian by todays standards.
Still an odd thing that some Israelis could want to be known as. An important set of geographies to be sure but the modern term of Asian really doesn't pick up until East of India.
We used to call east Asia the Orient and slant eyes Orientials. The whole argument that "Oriental" is offensive because it's used to describe things never made sense. Pretty sure the push to use Asian for all of them was so they could sneak in pajeets and Arabs under that label.
To be honest it's complicated and not in the retarded left way of claiming Muhammad is Asian.
China has A LOT of territory thanks to owning/subjugating Tibet so that would include India as Asian, I'd follow the border of China, maybe including Nepal and down towards Burma.
Africa is a bit of the same as those in the North bordering the Mediterranean would rather be referred to as Mediterranean than African. Then only 1/4th of Russia is on the European continent but they have a culture closer to them.
All I can agree on is the sand dwellers AREN'T Asian.
When its against white man, its "asians" to try to unite asians. Lawl. But asians, hate to be lumped in with other asians. East asians dont want to be associated with darkie asians like cambodians or thai and then those indian/pakis.
It's like halfway to the East dude. We could call it the Middle East or something. And the people from there could be called Middle Eastern. I am totes a genius!
They are just being obtuse. Everyone knows when you talk about an Asian, you aren't talking about some Arabian, Israeli, Indian, Russians, or whatever. Just like when you say someone is American, they are from the United States of America. Yeah, there's Canada, Mexico, all the places in South America, etc. Someone from Brazil is Brazilian, someone from the USA is American.
EU governments use "asian" as a way to hide criminal identities and obfuscate crime stats, to make it harder for White people to identify who is hurting us. The U.S. government does the same thing by grouping Hispanic people in with "White" in crime stats.
Hispanic is as worthless a descriptive term as Asian is, in the context mentioned in this thread. Hispanics can be of German, Italian, Portuguese or Spanish descent from countries like Chile or Argentina, as white as snowflakes. Or, can be the Indians of the area, the tribal Mongoloids/ "Asians" who wandered around before the coming of Europeans. Or, they can be the mixed super dark Africans that plague places like Brazil.
in genotype clustering, at the highest level, it's caucasoid, negroid, and mongoloid.
Js and most middle easterners at that abstraction level are mostly caucasoid, although the moors made it so there's a fair bit of negroid blood mixed into some arab countries.
debates after that largely focus on zoom levels of haplotype clusters. for example, some classifications break out australoids, while others don't. zooming in further, caucasoids are primarily some mish mash of aryans, ottomons, saxons, semites, hamites, and then some.
where it starts to get really fucked is that science largely considers wolves, coyotes, dogs, and dingos to either be different species or subspecies of each other... and the haplotype variance is greater between the 3 major human races than it is of these 4 types of animals.
The most modern genetic clustering research seems to break out australoids (Australian aborigines and Papua New Guineans) into their own group as well as whatever you call the group of native Americans/first nations/etc.
But interestingly, sub Saharan Africans are more distinct from all other human populations than all of the other populations are from each other.
yeah, sub saharan africans expose the coyote problem the most. if coyotes are a different species, sub saharan africans are certainly a different species. the genotyping is nuts... we're talking 70x greater distance in genes of sub saharan africans to other homo sapiens vs coyotes to wolves.
Out of curiosity, would you happen to know the genetic distance of Neanderthals and Denisovans? Why did they get the separate species treatment?
They do it to themselves and can't seem to resist meddling. Perhaps they see the western countries they've already sent down a potential death spiral won't be there for them long term and want to jump ship
As current clown world indicates, there is no bottom depth to clown world, only more honking. Japan is still mostly homogeneous, they can always be honked further by the honkers.
I don't think I've heard that saying before. What do they say about circus fires?
I wonder why a jew woman wrote the post war Japanese constitution. Make it make sense without banning me for rule 16.
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Asserting jewish race war
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Asserting a jewish race war
Russians are Asians.
Vladivostok, a stones throw from north Korea is more white than most cities in Western Europe.
Really crazy to define a race on a continent name as massive as Asia. I think the older term "Oriental" or "mongoloid " was probably more descriptive, but were memory holed long ago.
Asians don't consider Israelis asians
Asia Minor is what that entire Middle Eastern area is known as in older maps.
So yeah, I suppose you can call Israelis Asian if you add the Minor part into the mix.
You can call anyone from that region Asian Minor I reckon.
What's at the bottom of this particular dumpster fire? Are Asians cooler or something??
Technically incorrect, regarding Asia Minor. Asia Minor was/is just the Anatolian Peninsula. The rest would've been different things at different times, but "the Levant" is a pretty good catch-all.
Works for me! The Levantine peoples or the more Northern Anatolians all fit the bill better than Asians. Even the Silk Road walkers were more likely to be called Asian by todays standards.
Still an odd thing that some Israelis could want to be known as. An important set of geographies to be sure but the modern term of Asian really doesn't pick up until East of India.
No its Le-VAHN-tine… osa…
We used to call east Asia the Orient and slant eyes Orientials. The whole argument that "Oriental" is offensive because it's used to describe things never made sense. Pretty sure the push to use Asian for all of them was so they could sneak in pajeets and Arabs under that label.
Pajeets are always hiding their pajeet with the term Asian, or “south Asian”. Like bro you’re not from Thailand. Get out of here.
Who gives a fuck what 4 random Brazilians have to say about the geographical boundaries of Asia?
To be honest it's complicated and not in the retarded left way of claiming Muhammad is Asian.
China has A LOT of territory thanks to owning/subjugating Tibet so that would include India as Asian, I'd follow the border of China, maybe including Nepal and down towards Burma.
Africa is a bit of the same as those in the North bordering the Mediterranean would rather be referred to as Mediterranean than African. Then only 1/4th of Russia is on the European continent but they have a culture closer to them.
All I can agree on is the sand dwellers AREN'T Asian.
When its against white man, its "asians" to try to unite asians. Lawl. But asians, hate to be lumped in with other asians. East asians dont want to be associated with darkie asians like cambodians or thai and then those indian/pakis.
we call them asians because "oriental" was deemed verboten.
It's like halfway to the East dude. We could call it the Middle East or something. And the people from there could be called Middle Eastern. I am totes a genius!