I used to think it was contrarianism for clicks. And it still might be. But it's getting pretty suspect that it's the same few who do that. All the time.
sorry if i don't trust a guy who defends someone who tried to rewrite history, create blood libel on an entire nation , funds refugees and is basically everything that we fight against
It's particularly egregious when you purport your channel to be historically accurate. If this kind of revisionism is ok, why should I trust your discernment of sources on other topics?
Metatron calls out Lockleys revisionism in the video btbw posted several fucking times.
btbw just feels personally called out because Metatron doesn't think Lockley should be literally referred to as Satan, which btbw explicitly said he's Satan.
He bends over backwards to be charitable to Lockley and his motivations. To be fair, to Metatron, he probably doesn't know about Lockley working for a refugee organization. On the other hand, he should learn about that shit before being so charitable with him.
It's suspicious. He admits to corresponding with Lockley, yet he doesn't seem to have put much effort into figuring out Lockley's motivations, instead opting to just assume good faith.
He discusses the political motivations of some of Lockley's detractors though. When someone does something as strange as Lockley, it warrants closer examination into WTF they even hoped to accomplish. I don't know Metatron, but anyone savvy about Western politics knows about Great Replacement. It's not a huge leap to get the noggin joggin on Lockley.
If you're looking for 1:1 fact relationships, you're not even going to find it between his book and the Great Replacement. That takes dozens of insinuations. It's like me saying that people who support Drag Queen Story Hour are supporting Communism.
It's true, but the 1:1 chain requires hours of explanation about what the Queer movement is, what sexual liberation is, who John Money is, how Communism is related to Socialism is related to Queer Theory, how Drag Queen Story Hour isn't even a drag organization, but a Leftist non-profit organization, etc.
To have 1:1 evidence, you're going to have to try and prove that Lockley's explicit intent for releasing the book was to modify the ethnic distribution of Japan, and you're just not gonna find it.
He acknowledges Lockley's revisionism to make himself sound "more reasonable" and then he tells everyone not to cancel Lockley and that Lockley wasn't being intentionally malicious. Hence why he's a concern troll. He exists only to make sure the right wing "doesn't go too far" he exists only to disarm the right wing, and protect wokes that deserve to be punished.
He doesn't "acknowledge Lockley's revisionism", he refutes it entirely. As in, he specifically, is the one refuting it. He's not agreeing with someone else's opinion, he's gone over this before.
He doesn't agree with criminal harassment. He's calling out your weird degenerate behavior. And you deserve to be called out for being a schizo.
Ah yes, the guy that "started noticing bad DEI" after going out of his way to insult Az over that Starfield rant, the total fucking hypocrite he is?
If those DEI games had succeeded, actman would have been first in line to praise SBI. He’s just another meaningless spineless breadtuber.
It's just a coincidence.
That chin too! It's as if he was the impersonation of troll face.
Noticing anything there = ban while continuing to let spammers, pedos and snuff posts go wild.
We did not notice anything, Move along DoM.
Who knows.
Oy vey?
The oyest of veys.
I used to think it was contrarianism for clicks. And it still might be. But it's getting pretty suspect that it's the same few who do that. All the time.
Act ma'am had been doing this shit for ages now. Blatant mercenary looking for the "right" spin on everything
sorry if i don't trust a guy who defends someone who tried to rewrite history, create blood libel on an entire nation , funds refugees and is basically everything that we fight against
It's particularly egregious when you purport your channel to be historically accurate. If this kind of revisionism is ok, why should I trust your discernment of sources on other topics?
Metatron calls out Lockleys revisionism in the video btbw posted several fucking times.
btbw just feels personally called out because Metatron doesn't think Lockley should be literally referred to as Satan, which btbw explicitly said he's Satan.
He bends over backwards to be charitable to Lockley and his motivations. To be fair, to Metatron, he probably doesn't know about Lockley working for a refugee organization. On the other hand, he should learn about that shit before being so charitable with him.
It's suspicious. He admits to corresponding with Lockley, yet he doesn't seem to have put much effort into figuring out Lockley's motivations, instead opting to just assume good faith.
He's responding in an "objective" (read: literalist) manner.
I know Lockey is an activist going along with the DIE cult, because I'm acting as a culture warrior. Not acting in an objective way.
He discusses the political motivations of some of Lockley's detractors though. When someone does something as strange as Lockley, it warrants closer examination into WTF they even hoped to accomplish. I don't know Metatron, but anyone savvy about Western politics knows about Great Replacement. It's not a huge leap to get the noggin joggin on Lockley.
If you're looking for 1:1 fact relationships, you're not even going to find it between his book and the Great Replacement. That takes dozens of insinuations. It's like me saying that people who support Drag Queen Story Hour are supporting Communism.
It's true, but the 1:1 chain requires hours of explanation about what the Queer movement is, what sexual liberation is, who John Money is, how Communism is related to Socialism is related to Queer Theory, how Drag Queen Story Hour isn't even a drag organization, but a Leftist non-profit organization, etc.
To have 1:1 evidence, you're going to have to try and prove that Lockley's explicit intent for releasing the book was to modify the ethnic distribution of Japan, and you're just not gonna find it.
He acknowledges Lockley's revisionism to make himself sound "more reasonable" and then he tells everyone not to cancel Lockley and that Lockley wasn't being intentionally malicious. Hence why he's a concern troll. He exists only to make sure the right wing "doesn't go too far" he exists only to disarm the right wing, and protect wokes that deserve to be punished.
Again, these are bald faced lies.
He doesn't "acknowledge Lockley's revisionism", he refutes it entirely. As in, he specifically, is the one refuting it. He's not agreeing with someone else's opinion, he's gone over this before.
He doesn't agree with criminal harassment. He's calling out your weird degenerate behavior. And you deserve to be called out for being a schizo.
"muh criminal harassment"
no such thing.
And he deserves to be imprisoned as a person that is part of a 5th column not just harassed.
If Japan were still a Shogunate or Imperial, he would have been imprisoned for sure.
He didn't defend him, you're making shit up.
he did. He told everyone not to cancel Lockley
He told them not to criminally harass Lockley, and that's not a defense. You're a liar.
how can you "criminally harass Lockley"? also the whole video he was playing defense of Lockley
Still making shit up.
Lockley should be jailed. Deal with it
AZ was right on everything regarding trannyfield
Dios mio....
Comment Reported for:
What is this?
Account made 60 days ago, only started posting 23 hours ago.