sorry if i don't trust a guy who defends someone who tried to rewrite history, create blood libel on an entire nation , funds refugees and is basically everything that we fight against
It's particularly egregious when you purport your channel to be historically accurate. If this kind of revisionism is ok, why should I trust your discernment of sources on other topics?
Metatron calls out Lockleys revisionism in the video btbw posted several fucking times.
btbw just feels personally called out because Metatron doesn't think Lockley should be literally referred to as Satan, which btbw explicitly said he's Satan.
He bends over backwards to be charitable to Lockley and his motivations. To be fair, to Metatron, he probably doesn't know about Lockley working for a refugee organization. On the other hand, he should learn about that shit before being so charitable with him.
It's suspicious. He admits to corresponding with Lockley, yet he doesn't seem to have put much effort into figuring out Lockley's motivations, instead opting to just assume good faith.
He acknowledges Lockley's revisionism to make himself sound "more reasonable" and then he tells everyone not to cancel Lockley and that Lockley wasn't being intentionally malicious. Hence why he's a concern troll. He exists only to make sure the right wing "doesn't go too far" he exists only to disarm the right wing, and protect wokes that deserve to be punished.
He doesn't "acknowledge Lockley's revisionism", he refutes it entirely. As in, he specifically, is the one refuting it. He's not agreeing with someone else's opinion, he's gone over this before.
He doesn't agree with criminal harassment. He's calling out your weird degenerate behavior. And you deserve to be called out for being a schizo.
sorry if i don't trust a guy who defends someone who tried to rewrite history, create blood libel on an entire nation , funds refugees and is basically everything that we fight against
It's particularly egregious when you purport your channel to be historically accurate. If this kind of revisionism is ok, why should I trust your discernment of sources on other topics?
Metatron calls out Lockleys revisionism in the video btbw posted several fucking times.
btbw just feels personally called out because Metatron doesn't think Lockley should be literally referred to as Satan, which btbw explicitly said he's Satan.
He bends over backwards to be charitable to Lockley and his motivations. To be fair, to Metatron, he probably doesn't know about Lockley working for a refugee organization. On the other hand, he should learn about that shit before being so charitable with him.
It's suspicious. He admits to corresponding with Lockley, yet he doesn't seem to have put much effort into figuring out Lockley's motivations, instead opting to just assume good faith.
He's responding in an "objective" (read: literalist) manner.
I know Lockey is an activist going along with the DIE cult, because I'm acting as a culture warrior. Not acting in an objective way.
He acknowledges Lockley's revisionism to make himself sound "more reasonable" and then he tells everyone not to cancel Lockley and that Lockley wasn't being intentionally malicious. Hence why he's a concern troll. He exists only to make sure the right wing "doesn't go too far" he exists only to disarm the right wing, and protect wokes that deserve to be punished.
Again, these are bald faced lies.
He doesn't "acknowledge Lockley's revisionism", he refutes it entirely. As in, he specifically, is the one refuting it. He's not agreeing with someone else's opinion, he's gone over this before.
He doesn't agree with criminal harassment. He's calling out your weird degenerate behavior. And you deserve to be called out for being a schizo.
He didn't defend him, you're making shit up.
he did. He told everyone not to cancel Lockley
He told them not to criminally harass Lockley, and that's not a defense. You're a liar.
how can you "criminally harass Lockley"? also the whole video he was playing defense of Lockley