Less than 4% of gun deaths are caused by rifles, and that includes bolt action, lever action, and the like. Most gun deaths are from the most common kind of handgun on the market (which are 9mm pistols these days) because they're easily concealable. Those crimes are also mostly committed by blacks which is another reason that no one wants to talk about it.
I grew up in Africa, lived among Zulu’s, Xhosa, Swazi, Mozambican, Nigerian, Malawian and Zimbabweans.
Every single thing you said above is 100% accurate.
The only thing I doubt is that there’ll ever be any kind of enlightenment or whatever on that continent. Its days of great civilisations are buried somewhere deep beneath the sands of Egypt, it’s done.
My grandmother used to tell me they were the descendants of Cain (that whole thing from the bible about how his descendants would be marked by a stain on their skin and how all the tribes of the world would hate them and curse them and forever cast them out etc). The older I get, the more it sounds about right to me.
While it's fair to say that you're correct about Blacks, it's not just Blacks.
Only European developed modern society & technology, and even European peoples are not adapted to them. It's wrong to pretend like these other groups integrate. They all introduce problems, it's just the question of how much of the problem you accept.
Take away modern tech from India & China and you'd reduce scamming online by 90%, for example. Why does the rest of the internet have to suck just for them?
Anyone looking to disarm you is looking to prey upon you and should be met with extreme hostility if not outright violence and I'm tired of pretending otherwise. Disarming someone is a direct physical attack with malicious intent and should be interpreted as such.
I have a friend who does that as a hobby. There are jokes about setting a duffel bag full of money on fire to compete. He can hit 300 yard shots and is considered terrible.
I wouldn't be surprised if Sikhs were still allowed to wear their daggers in public in the UK. Even if the stated reason for needing them in the first place is explicitly known to be as protection and as a weapon against Muslims.
Hmm, is this less pathetic than when they put a rusty spoon as a 'deadly weapons confiscated off the streets' or more?
This is speaks to how much the UK establishment is afraid of public reprisals, that ANYTHING close of representing a tool of protection needs to be clamped down on HARD.
Reminds me of Venture Bros when 21 leads 24 and the Monarch to his secret arsenal that turns out to be a bunch of toys. When will Hulk fists be banned??
I'd probably want to arrest any person who just grunts or screams while fooling around with swords, bombs, and arrows everywhere. That's just a recipe for trouble.
You should know our blade (purchasing) laws are extremely lax compared to the US/UK, now's the time if you want any before turdeau bans everything up to and invluding scissors. Don't get caught carrying one though, it's left up to the cop's discretion as to whether you have an excuse to be carrying such a blade. So you're fucked.
Remember that "No one needs 30 round magazine" is just the start of a long, miserable road that leads here.
Less than 4% of gun deaths are caused by rifles, and that includes bolt action, lever action, and the like. Most gun deaths are from the most common kind of handgun on the market (which are 9mm pistols these days) because they're easily concealable. Those crimes are also mostly committed by blacks which is another reason that no one wants to talk about it.
I grew up in Africa, lived among Zulu’s, Xhosa, Swazi, Mozambican, Nigerian, Malawian and Zimbabweans.
Every single thing you said above is 100% accurate.
The only thing I doubt is that there’ll ever be any kind of enlightenment or whatever on that continent. Its days of great civilisations are buried somewhere deep beneath the sands of Egypt, it’s done.
My grandmother used to tell me they were the descendants of Cain (that whole thing from the bible about how his descendants would be marked by a stain on their skin and how all the tribes of the world would hate them and curse them and forever cast them out etc). The older I get, the more it sounds about right to me.
Well, if those "We Wuz Dick Washers" images are real, it means that the Jews knew of subsaharan blacks and thought they were shit, too.
While it's fair to say that you're correct about Blacks, it's not just Blacks.
Only European developed modern society & technology, and even European peoples are not adapted to them. It's wrong to pretend like these other groups integrate. They all introduce problems, it's just the question of how much of the problem you accept.
Take away modern tech from India & China and you'd reduce scamming online by 90%, for example. Why does the rest of the internet have to suck just for them?
So how would you reply to someone saying: well, that just means "we" need to ban handguns as well?
Anyone looking to disarm you is looking to prey upon you and should be met with extreme hostility if not outright violence and I'm tired of pretending otherwise. Disarming someone is a direct physical attack with malicious intent and should be interpreted as such.
Oh they know. Don't think they are totally stupid. They just know they can't disarm the population all at once.
I have a friend who does that as a hobby. There are jokes about setting a duffel bag full of money on fire to compete. He can hit 300 yard shots and is considered terrible.
If the government is telling the truth, and we all know they never lie, Kennedy was killed by a bolt action rifle.
It wouldn't have been a problem if he wasn't White.
I wouldn't be surprised if Sikhs were still allowed to wear their daggers in public in the UK. Even if the stated reason for needing them in the first place is explicitly known to be as protection and as a weapon against Muslims.
Sikhs were very much armed with swords during the riots in Birmingham about 10 years ago
Hmm, is this less pathetic than when they put a rusty spoon as a 'deadly weapons confiscated off the streets' or more?
This is speaks to how much the UK establishment is afraid of public reprisals, that ANYTHING close of representing a tool of protection needs to be clamped down on HARD.
Meanwhile, literal imported Africans behead citizens on the streets.
Wait until someone clues them in on spears. Essentially a tree branch that you can sharpen on the sidewalk.
Ban Trees!!
Scotland: Hold my ale.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10546071/Millions-of-trees-chopped-down-to-make-way-for-Scottish-wind-farms.html
Making swords illegal while state goons and criminals are walking around with guns basically just means "we want you all to die"
its not even a sword , its a tiny toy
But he might use the toy to peel an apple.
He's in this situation because of the behavior of coloreds.
he looks like he voted for his situation.
He does have neck tattoos. Doubt anyone will hire him so he must be 100% on state benefits.
edit: oh no someone with a neck tattoo downvoted me 🤣
Everyone in Europe I've seen with face/neck tattoos, whose political affiliation I know, was right-wing.
Yes, it surprises me as well.
Which explains why he's being persecuted for an eight-inch toy sword.
Reminds me of Venture Bros when 21 leads 24 and the Monarch to his secret arsenal that turns out to be a bunch of toys. When will Hulk fists be banned??
I'd probably want to arrest any person who just grunts or screams while fooling around with swords, bombs, and arrows everywhere. That's just a recipe for trouble.
Well you gotta get ahead of that sort of thing. First it’s swords and arrow in the street, next they’re I. Your home smashing your pottery.
Canadians!
You should know our blade (purchasing) laws are extremely lax compared to the US/UK, now's the time if you want any before turdeau bans everything up to and invluding scissors. Don't get caught carrying one though, it's left up to the cop's discretion as to whether you have an excuse to be carrying such a blade. So you're fucked.
That's not a toy if it's sharp metal...
from the photos, it's not sharpened edges
If it's pointy and made of metal it's sharp enough.
More akin to a model sword, which isn't a toy either.
you must be british
U.S and sorry for having common sense. Would you give this to your 6 year old to play with?
It always amazes me how people will instantly become retards when you confront their ideas with truth.
Is that dude a 6 yr old? Did he give it to a 6 yr old?
There are a lot of things I wouldn't give to a 6 yr old to play with that I as an adult have no issue holding that also aren't sharp or metal.
If you want to talk about retards, check your analogy first
He's literally self-named "Dildoman9000" and is calling you retarded.
let's be fair. his argument was way more retarded than his name
Hey actual retard, if you wouldn't give it to your 6 year old it isn't a toy.
No matter who's holding it it wouldn't change my analogy you fucking moron.
You literally typed out complete nonsense 🤣
I wouldn’t give lego ucs or malifaux minis to my 6 yr old. Doesn’t not make them not toys.
Even toys have age ranges. Retailers literally sell toys that way. https://www.target.com/c/toys-for-ages-8-10/-/N-wn8i6
Do you want to deny those are toys or ban people from bringing them into public?
If you want to see a fucking moron you should go look in the mirror cause you’re one