All I want to know is why nobody ever points out who exactly is driving the immigration policy. If the German people can't even say that much then they are straight up slaves. This isn't complicated.
Alas, the last time Germans grew so bold as to rattle their cage, the fathers & grandfathers of the architects of today's immigration policy summoned most of the world to bomb and rape them into submission, tear Germany itself in half, and put their kids in the custody of pedophiles with the full expectation that they would have any 'fascistic tendencies' raped out of them as early as possible for decades on end, so as to make absolutely sure the lesson they wished to teach sank in that time.
I've long thought that if possible I would treat Hitler like Ebenezer Scrooge* and show him what his actions ultimately did to the German people and the larger world. If he truly only had good intentions but badly miscalculated, I think he would end himself on the spot.
I didn't downvote you but I do have to disagree. I think at most he (and, frankly, any other genuine German nationalist from that time period put into his position) might have done some things differently, but the Treaty of Versailles and the absolute pile of shit Germany had to eat in the interwar years made some dramatic and - to put it mildly - controversial moves necessary to break out of the rut it was in: Weimar Germany was very much stuck between multiple rocks and hard places. Not doing anything or continuing to try to play the rigged game the globalists had put together through the League of Nations and their various Entente sockpuppets would only have guaranteed that they'd remain in their hopelessly demilitarized & demoralized state, complete with wheelbarrows of useless cash and child hookers on every street, and thereby a slower and more drawn-out death for Germany (rather like what's going on now actually).
Hitler was doing great on rebuilding the social fabric of the German people, it was his militancy that went radically overboard. Had he just stuck with the former, we would have a completely different history behind us. :-/
While you're not inherently wrong, you're forgetting the huge fact that it was Britain, France, Poland, and bankers that wanted to instigate a war against Germany after Hitler took power. There was a secret agreement with Poland to antagonize Germany into a war, and regardless of who started it, Britain and France would ally with Poland against Germany. This is why Briain and France declared war against Germany for invading Poland, but not against Soviet Russia for doing the same thing, just a few weeks later. Furthermore, just like during WW1, every peace envoy Germany sent to negotiate peace, was denied, or imprisoned.
Sure. Blame it on the people who made preparations to deal with Germany if they started a SECOND world war. That makes sense. Let's ignore everything Germany did and claim the people who were invaded were the ones who were at fault. Because you for some reason believe that a socialist dictator who ruined his nation wasn't a massive faggot.
You've been lied to about everything. Stop blindly accepting the history you were taught. It was either an outright lie or, at best, carefully curated half truths to distort reality, to push a false narrative and conclusion (i.e. propaganda and brainwashing).
Pre-ww2 Germany was recovering after the nazis ended the weimar. Then Hitler decided to shake hands with Stalin and join his ideological cousin in picking a fight. Because deranged leftists always prioritize personal power over the prosperity of their nation or lives of their people.
Hitler was a faggot, and his stupidity destroyed Germany forever.
German-Soviet cooperation predated Hitler by quite some time, the 1922 Treaty of Rapallo between the early Weimar gov't and Lenin had already established extensive economic & military ties between the two for a decade before the Nazis' rise (with the Germans getting to build various secret training academies & factories/testing sites on Soviet soil to circumvent the Versailles demilitarization terms). As for Molotov-Ribbentrop, that was just a case of Hitler exploiting the Entente/Allies' fecklessness & duplicity: the Soviets were the most militantly pro-Czechoslovak great power in the lead-up to Munich, but obviously their hopes for any anti-Nazi coalition (one they wanted because they weren't blind and deaf either, Mein Kampf was a published work and not some top-secret document that no Soviet spy could have possibly read) were frustrated by the Western Allies dropping Czechoslovakia like a hot potato and Poland jumping in to annex the Zaolzie region. Of course Stalin would've decided that if the Western Allies were willing to throw a fellow democracy with good relationships under the bus, he'd have better luck trying to find a better deal with Hitler, and Hitler meanwhile understood that short-term cooperation against a common enemy in Poland beats risking pushing the Soviets back onto a pro-Allied course early on.
Recall that it wasn't until after Munich that Stalin replaced his pro-Allied and anti-German Soviet foreign minister, Maxim Litvinov, with Molotov. Poland could hardly present itself (despite the best efforts of Allied propagandists) like some innocent lamb after grabbing Zaolzie under much the same rationale as Hitler used for the Sudetenland and its own efforts to restrict & suppress Ukrainians (suffice to say that while it was disproportionate, it wasn't like there was no reason whatsoever for the Ukrainians' own extremely brutal massacres of Poles in Galicia-Volhynia during WW2). Hitler merely exploited an opening created by the retardation, weakness and greed of his enemies, and neither he nor Stalin (who would've attacked Germany if Hitler hadn't attacked him first) were under any delusion that theirs was a lasting agreement which should have long outlived the elimination of their most obvious mutual enemy; the funny mustache man's big crime here was failing to crush the Soviets with his backstab.
Sorry but I can't agree with the low birth rate argument, it is completely bogus in my view. Populations respond to what is going on around them and they will reach a population equilibrium due to those dynamics. If people aren't having families you don't import a completely incompatible people, you instead fix what was broken and I would argue that the things that were broken was done on purpose.
If we didn't have to compete with mass immigration for all houses and jobs (and the lowered pay of them because of their willingness to work for slave wages), most people would be financially secure enough to have more kids and likely put us much closer to the replacement rate.
You are repeating their narrative of selling the solution to a problem that is partially created by that solution in the first place.
All governments around the world need immigration due to the low birth rate.
How about they address the causes of the lower birth rate instead of turning their own countries into third world shitholes? They'll get more people, but fundamentally change entire countries in the process.
How long is it gonna take before Europeans realize deportation is a con, that the removed people simply return in a matter of weeks or even days? Vlad didn't save his country by deporting the invaders.
Oh they still have to leave at the end, the US' biggest mistake was believing the fairytale of peaceful melting pot coexistence as an excuse to take the easy way out half way through, instead of deporting them as even the emancipators with any political foresight argued for. Plenty of other nations and empires had way more slaves for way longer without these problems because they understood that the default outcome for a slave is not assimilation, that is the exception.
But sending them back without a disincentive against returning doesn't work either. A couple years of hard labor should stop the revolving door. Even if you want to argue bringing them over in the first place was still the US' biggest mistake, they're already here. Getting an economic boon in addition to giving a strong "and don't come back!" kick in the ass out the door is just a win/win
This shows the real reason why war is bad. Generally the military wants the best, smartest, strongest, most loyal, and bravest to be troops. Then when they die all that’s left is a majority of cowards, leftists and the dregs. German squandered entire generations of their best men so that communists, antifags, and open border Eurocrats could take over. There will be no “and then one day” when police automatically assume a knife wielding third worlder is automatically the good guy.
That and colonies. The people that have the will to liberty leave to go build a new life away from their country, instead of fixing it. This is why the brits are dead as a people - between the wars and emigration all that's left of them is the willing serfs.
All I want to know is why nobody ever points out who exactly is driving the immigration policy. If the German people can't even say that much then they are straight up slaves. This isn't complicated.
Name names.
Oy vey! Names are racist and anti-semitic!
Alas, the last time Germans grew so bold as to rattle their cage, the fathers & grandfathers of the architects of today's immigration policy summoned most of the world to bomb and rape them into submission, tear Germany itself in half, and put their kids in the custody of pedophiles with the full expectation that they would have any 'fascistic tendencies' raped out of them as early as possible for decades on end, so as to make absolutely sure the lesson they wished to teach sank in that time.
I've long thought that if possible I would treat Hitler like Ebenezer Scrooge* and show him what his actions ultimately did to the German people and the larger world. If he truly only had good intentions but badly miscalculated, I think he would end himself on the spot.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebenezer_Scrooge
I didn't downvote you but I do have to disagree. I think at most he (and, frankly, any other genuine German nationalist from that time period put into his position) might have done some things differently, but the Treaty of Versailles and the absolute pile of shit Germany had to eat in the interwar years made some dramatic and - to put it mildly - controversial moves necessary to break out of the rut it was in: Weimar Germany was very much stuck between multiple rocks and hard places. Not doing anything or continuing to try to play the rigged game the globalists had put together through the League of Nations and their various Entente sockpuppets would only have guaranteed that they'd remain in their hopelessly demilitarized & demoralized state, complete with wheelbarrows of useless cash and child hookers on every street, and thereby a slower and more drawn-out death for Germany (rather like what's going on now actually).
Hitler was doing great on rebuilding the social fabric of the German people, it was his militancy that went radically overboard. Had he just stuck with the former, we would have a completely different history behind us. :-/
While you're not inherently wrong, you're forgetting the huge fact that it was Britain, France, Poland, and bankers that wanted to instigate a war against Germany after Hitler took power. There was a secret agreement with Poland to antagonize Germany into a war, and regardless of who started it, Britain and France would ally with Poland against Germany. This is why Briain and France declared war against Germany for invading Poland, but not against Soviet Russia for doing the same thing, just a few weeks later. Furthermore, just like during WW1, every peace envoy Germany sent to negotiate peace, was denied, or imprisoned.
Sure. Blame it on the people who made preparations to deal with Germany if they started a SECOND world war. That makes sense. Let's ignore everything Germany did and claim the people who were invaded were the ones who were at fault. Because you for some reason believe that a socialist dictator who ruined his nation wasn't a massive faggot.
You've been lied to about everything. Stop blindly accepting the history you were taught. It was either an outright lie or, at best, carefully curated half truths to distort reality, to push a false narrative and conclusion (i.e. propaganda and brainwashing).
You should read these:
https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/wrsynopsis.html
https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/NHC/NewPDFs/GERMANY/GER.Polish.Atrocities.Against.German.Minority.in.Poland.1940.pdf
Pre-ww2 Germany was recovering after the nazis ended the weimar. Then Hitler decided to shake hands with Stalin and join his ideological cousin in picking a fight. Because deranged leftists always prioritize personal power over the prosperity of their nation or lives of their people.
Hitler was a faggot, and his stupidity destroyed Germany forever.
German-Soviet cooperation predated Hitler by quite some time, the 1922 Treaty of Rapallo between the early Weimar gov't and Lenin had already established extensive economic & military ties between the two for a decade before the Nazis' rise (with the Germans getting to build various secret training academies & factories/testing sites on Soviet soil to circumvent the Versailles demilitarization terms). As for Molotov-Ribbentrop, that was just a case of Hitler exploiting the Entente/Allies' fecklessness & duplicity: the Soviets were the most militantly pro-Czechoslovak great power in the lead-up to Munich, but obviously their hopes for any anti-Nazi coalition (one they wanted because they weren't blind and deaf either, Mein Kampf was a published work and not some top-secret document that no Soviet spy could have possibly read) were frustrated by the Western Allies dropping Czechoslovakia like a hot potato and Poland jumping in to annex the Zaolzie region. Of course Stalin would've decided that if the Western Allies were willing to throw a fellow democracy with good relationships under the bus, he'd have better luck trying to find a better deal with Hitler, and Hitler meanwhile understood that short-term cooperation against a common enemy in Poland beats risking pushing the Soviets back onto a pro-Allied course early on.
Recall that it wasn't until after Munich that Stalin replaced his pro-Allied and anti-German Soviet foreign minister, Maxim Litvinov, with Molotov. Poland could hardly present itself (despite the best efforts of Allied propagandists) like some innocent lamb after grabbing Zaolzie under much the same rationale as Hitler used for the Sudetenland and its own efforts to restrict & suppress Ukrainians (suffice to say that while it was disproportionate, it wasn't like there was no reason whatsoever for the Ukrainians' own extremely brutal massacres of Poles in Galicia-Volhynia during WW2). Hitler merely exploited an opening created by the retardation, weakness and greed of his enemies, and neither he nor Stalin (who would've attacked Germany if Hitler hadn't attacked him first) were under any delusion that theirs was a lasting agreement which should have long outlived the elimination of their most obvious mutual enemy; the funny mustache man's big crime here was failing to crush the Soviets with his backstab.
Sorry but I can't agree with the low birth rate argument, it is completely bogus in my view. Populations respond to what is going on around them and they will reach a population equilibrium due to those dynamics. If people aren't having families you don't import a completely incompatible people, you instead fix what was broken and I would argue that the things that were broken was done on purpose.
If we didn't have to compete with mass immigration for all houses and jobs (and the lowered pay of them because of their willingness to work for slave wages), most people would be financially secure enough to have more kids and likely put us much closer to the replacement rate.
You are repeating their narrative of selling the solution to a problem that is partially created by that solution in the first place.
How about they address the causes of the lower birth rate instead of turning their own countries into third world shitholes? They'll get more people, but fundamentally change entire countries in the process.
AUSLANDER RAUS AUSLANDER RAUS
This is why and where the meme will lead from.
For absolutely no reason at all
somehow, palpatine returned.
How long is it gonna take before Europeans realize deportation is a con, that the removed people simply return in a matter of weeks or even days? Vlad didn't save his country by deporting the invaders.
Well, he did send some back with their turbans nailed to their heads.
They've already been leeching for years, they owe a debt before they get to leave and indentured servitude seems like a fair settlement.
Just imagine how much more competitive domestic manufacturing could be if they didn't have to worry about labour costs or safety equipment.
This is retarded. Have you learned nothing from the US' history and current problems. Send them all back. If you keep them they just become a problem.
Oh they still have to leave at the end, the US' biggest mistake was believing the fairytale of peaceful melting pot coexistence as an excuse to take the easy way out half way through, instead of deporting them as even the emancipators with any political foresight argued for. Plenty of other nations and empires had way more slaves for way longer without these problems because they understood that the default outcome for a slave is not assimilation, that is the exception.
But sending them back without a disincentive against returning doesn't work either. A couple years of hard labor should stop the revolving door. Even if you want to argue bringing them over in the first place was still the US' biggest mistake, they're already here. Getting an economic boon in addition to giving a strong "and don't come back!" kick in the ass out the door is just a win/win
Auslander raus
kill them, deport the families, charge afghanistan with the bill for both.
This shows the real reason why war is bad. Generally the military wants the best, smartest, strongest, most loyal, and bravest to be troops. Then when they die all that’s left is a majority of cowards, leftists and the dregs. German squandered entire generations of their best men so that communists, antifags, and open border Eurocrats could take over. There will be no “and then one day” when police automatically assume a knife wielding third worlder is automatically the good guy.
That and colonies. The people that have the will to liberty leave to go build a new life away from their country, instead of fixing it. This is why the brits are dead as a people - between the wars and emigration all that's left of them is the willing serfs.
"youths" at it again