The name is right there at the top, as is the title of the article. I'm very surprised that you can't find it. It was the first Google result for 'nature papers retracted'
Unfortunately I can see the usual suspects using this as an opportunity to force retraction of research that's inconvenient to the agenda on the most tenuous of grounds.
The world’s largest database to track retractions, collated by the media organization Retraction Watch, does not yet include all of 2023’s withdrawn papers. To analyse trends, Nature combined the roughly 45,000 retractions detailed in that data set — which in September was acquired for public distribution by Crossref, a non-profit organization that indexes publishing data — with another 5,000 retractions from Hindawi and other publishers, with the aid of the Dimensions database.
I guess that's the source.
The number of retractions issued for research articles in 2023 has passed 10,000 — smashing annual records — as publishers struggle to clean up a slew of sham papers and peer-review fraud. Among large research-producing nations, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Russia and China have the highest retraction rates over the past two decades, a Nature analysis has found.
So the usual suspects are doubling down on cheating and plagiarizing.
Unironically Pakistani anti-gay research is pretty thorough and always based. They’ve had research related to fags and increased incidence of violence, groupthink, and response to propaganda. All of which are well documented and very intriguing
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8
The name is right there at the top, as is the title of the article. I'm very surprised that you can't find it. It was the first Google result for 'nature papers retracted'
https://archive.ph/dSF1X
Archive. I don't know what I did wrong.
In before a certain guy yells at you for putting a screenshot as the post anyway.
the post was very clearly looking for source, totally different
I thought the title was joking about how "sources" will now be harder to find or believe, because so many are being retracted.
That was an unintended but welcome joke.
Reading is hard.
>INTEGRITY EXPERTS
TEGRITY
This makes me both laugh and feel disturbed at the same time.
Unfortunately I can see the usual suspects using this as an opportunity to force retraction of research that's inconvenient to the agenda on the most tenuous of grounds.
I guess that's the source.
So the usual suspects are doubling down on cheating and plagiarizing.
Unironically Pakistani anti-gay research is pretty thorough and always based. They’ve had research related to fags and increased incidence of violence, groupthink, and response to propaganda. All of which are well documented and very intriguing
I'm sure India is in there, too.
I have been hearing this all around, but haven't found a source yet.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8
Thank you.
a lot are probably bullshit social-science papers.