Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

18
posted 2 years ago by Lethn 2 years ago by Lethn +18 / -0
30 comments share
30 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (30)
sorted by:
▲ 20 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 20 points 2 years ago +20 / -0

"Even I". As if you're some ultimate litmus test and not, like, the forefront of hating it.

If the game dev for "Furry Simulator 2024" came out and said "even I", that'd have some weight, but you saying it is like an avowed lifelong vegan saying "even I have gotten to the point of disliking eating meat!".

By all means, hate away, shits freaky. But don't try to act as some empathetic arbiter while doing so. It doesn't make you morally superior, we all at least point and mock furries here, it just makes you seem self-aggrandizing.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Hellsbells00 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

The furries and the troons are the same phenomenon - overexposure to porn and internet echo chambers + mental illness = ubsalvageable degenerate.

And the furries were acting like that well before the troons became a social contagion. They've been hated for decades for a reason.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Assassin47 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Indeed. The troons were only able to break into normalcy because of "muh sCiEncE" (social science) legitimizing them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 17 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 17 points 2 years ago +17 / -0

They have a fuckton of money. Ask a ton of artists and they'll admit they kept the lights on and were able to go self employed by drawing degenerate furry shit.

It's why I always love this joke about them

They have so much money and they KNOW they have so much disposable money that companies will always subtlety pander to them. Unless they do something as toxic as a Rainfurrest, this ain't a problem that can be solved as easily as the LGBT shit or feminists they DON'T have the disposable income and is only because of large governments and organisations they push it.

Just look at how profitable women's sports are compared to how profitable any furry meet up is...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– SpezTouchesChildren 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

They have a fuckton of money. Ask a ton of artists and they'll admit they kept the lights on and were able to go self employed by drawing degenerate furry shit.

That's the main difference between furfags and footfags. The furfags are willing to drop serious coin on their degenerate fetish. The footfags (pajeets in particular) just spam women with requests for feet pics. I'd feel bad for the women if I wasn't long past the point of giving shit about them, so a plague on all their houses.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– deleted 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– JuanTitor 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

The 'just look down" made me think: is it mostly emasculated men who have a foot fetish? Like when I think of a "bobs and vagine" Indian guy, I don't think of a high T masculine man.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– ItsOkayToBeWight 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

The furries always were in gaming. They're just coming out of the closet and injecting their "lifestyle" into the games they're making and the execs aren't telling them to knock it off.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Kaarous 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

I'd be more concerned if you weren't annoyed by perverts.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– Gizortnik 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

The weird fucking cretins are practically urinating on major games and the devs are simply acknowledging it instead of spraying them with a hose.

I actually think it's more than that. I think they are weaponizing it. This is why I had that one rant screaming at Dreamworks, yelling "YOU KNEW" in regards to their trailers for Zootopia.

Being an insular community, furries are easily manipulatable into generating viral online marketing campaigns (as long as they aren't actually the forefront). As u/SocraticMethod1 also noted they have significant disposable income, making it actually mildly profitable to market to that niche.

Not only that, but due to how online communities will also move into online games and IT; there is a real point where furries are simply entering into development and developer roles. As such, they (without anyone asking questions), simply injecting options that would otherwise never have been available.

Additionally, I think there's a larger philosophical discussion we might need to have regarding mental illness, lack meaning, identity crisis, and over-sexualization of young-people that's actually manufacturing furries. Not as a kind of recruiting attempt you might see with Queers, but the natural result of arrested emotional developments of children growing into puberty and adults while having never actually developed a mature and stoic emotional self.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– JuanTitor 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

To your last point, I just know that quite a few little boys like Sonic the Hedgehog, like my cousin's sons. I saw with horror as one was on Youtube the Sonic furry fanart stuff that gets pushed on him in the recommendations.

I'm sure he watched some of it to start the cascade of recommendations, but the first video was almost certainly a YouTube recommendation only because he watched normal Sonic content, not degenerate furry crap.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Gizortnik 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

That's probably a weakness in the algorithm. YouTube has never really been safe for children to just go about browsing. You need some serious curation if you want to actually display only child-friendly content that you can confirm isn't subversive or randomly spliced with crazy shit, or potentially some trippy as fuck algorithm nonsense.

If the algorithm is looking for videos with the same words, or associated popularity, or even just similar colors and shapes, it's not really a good algorithm for children.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– SpezTouchesChildren 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I hate to make it sound like I'm defending furfags, but I'm not aware of them dragging the general public into their fetish or touching children. The same can't be said about trannies. Just make sure to ruthlessly bully any furfag who goes out in public. We let the fag and tranny problem get away from us and we shouldn't make that mistake again.

I am of course with the Sims 4 talking about the werewolves DLC but there's also Rimworld's xenotype.

a) I haven't played RimWorld since like 2018 and I haven't kept up with news about it, but I highly doubt Tynan is catering to furfags. He pissed in the left's Cheerios by questioning the anti-GG narrative and refusing to respond to an anti-RimWorld hit piece a danger hair wrote with sufficient contrition. He also refused to allow some feminazi to advertise her crap in the game, and that caused another blowup. I'd be highly surprised if Tynan is motivated by anything other than good game design.

b) EA putting furfag shit in their games is far more believable, but werewolves were in The Sims 3 Supernatural EP. That came out in 2012, and pervert shit in games wasn't a problem back then (EA was already shit for different reasons in 2012). Unless I'm missing something it sounds like EA is just continuing their unethical practice of charging the same price for a tiny fraction of the content that would have been in a TS3 EP.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– LauriThorne 11 points 2 years ago +11 / -0

Oh, but they do drag the public into their fetish.

When I was in HS I worked in a local Chuck E Cheese equivalent, and every New Years we had the local "Mascot Association" rent just the party room. Not the whole the place, just a room, so they would be mingling with the normies.

Boy, I got a lot of angry looks from parents that day.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Gizortnik 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

I don't even think it's the trannies, per se. It's not like Drag Shows didn't exist prior to 2022.

It's the Queer Revolutionaries infesting themselves within other subcultures and politically weaponizing them. Queers are clearly the ones recruiting children and creating unholy alliances.

There were (and are) plenty of Queers in the Furry fandom, but it sounds like there's been blowback developing there first (because they've been in it the longest, and Furries are also younger, and are going to show a portion of the Gen Z blowback we've been seeing).

The Queer emphasis on "Pride" to create political activism seems to be at odds with an understanding of inherent shame that Furries seem to have. I think they recognize that they are fundamentally sexual degenerates, and aren't ever going to be able to move away from that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

this. furries are annoying when you find them, but they are extremely hard to find. they're even a few people in my fencing group that I'm pretty sure are furries judging by their discord profiles, but you wouldn't know it otherwise. for the most part, they're pretty good at keeping to themselves.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– OmegaBird 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I have no problem with anything furry as long as it's not kinky shit. Hell I don't like any kinky shit regardless of the orientation or creed, in my games. Furries are no problem in games. As long as I dont have to see, hear about or engage in anything sexual of Any kind in games then I don't care. Its just another theme.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– OmegaBird 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I suppose it depends on the diegesis then. Elder scrolls has kahjiit and argonians since inception. Its deeply woven into the game lore. I guess if that's an issue, you can just not engage with anything elder scrolls? It's the sorta the reason why I don't even touch the spider man games with miles, the replacement shit. Or baulders gate 3, due to the aforementioned kinky shit being overt and unavoidable. I have a backlog of games to last a life time and I don't suffer from FOMO. I can let something I dont like be forgotten.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– OmegaBird 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

If you're talking about creepy fan art, I mean that weird shit exists in all media. I avoid it like the clot shot. Otherwise if its "just furries" and it doesnt violste game lore, thats just back to the themes, isnt it?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Hellsbells00 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Deranged faggot claiming that the left and furries aren't pedophiles?

Found the fed. No real person is actually that stupid. Woodchipper yourself.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy