I believe I have an interesting counter: OK, people of color can't be racist against whites, however they can be racist++. See, racism++ is the same as racism, except that people of color can be racist towards whites. This obviously makes it worse, so why aren't we doing anything to fight racism++?
They never did, the fact that people even entertained their bullshit has been part of the problem. As far as I'm concerned the west is lost and I'm preparing accordingly.
Well we can grow anything here, plenty of water to so living day to day actually isn't that much of a problem for us. Also stocking up on canned food etc. of course and exploring different possibilities for electricity generation. It all depends though on what the government does this year because it seems even by their standards their crazy is boiling over.
If law and order simply breaks down I actually think the infrastructure is going to be mostly fine, been wargaming it a bit going to have to wait and see as I've pointed out before.
Lol No no, so I've got a property in a place I'm fairly comfortable, obviously won't reveal where exactly for doxxing reasons. It's got a sizeable garden and last year I successfully grew a bunch of vegetables no problem, in fact got bloody swamped with harvest so this year is probably going to be amazing. The Britain you see on television and everything with shitty block flats and horrid buildings are usually run down cities and towns, other places are villages etc. outside the city limits where it's very easy to take care of yourself if you really wanted to.
Food won't be a problem, should probably set up rain collection as well, the only way anything would be affected where I am is if the shit heads try to turn off the utilities and block everything off to 'punish' the population. However if they did that they'd be fucked because even the normies would be out in force.
I honestly don't know what the retards are thinking even suggesting conscription on public, it's a stupid idea. Which explains why even Sunak is probably immediately walking it all back. I mean they would if they could, but they probably have done wargaming on such a scenario as I have.
See, my concern wasn't food. It was defensibility. Much like my own, your government has imported millions of foreign barbarians to assist in oppressing you, and I was curious to what extent your nation was preparing to deal with such a thing.
Normally I would have zero faith in normies, but I think a lot of people would be surprised. I think a lot of people are only putting up with it because they still technically believe in the concept of law and order, once that breaks down well, gloves are off. It's worth pointing out that yes there is a sizeable Muslim population here, but they're not all a monolith, we've got Sikhs and Chinese too among others.
Going back to that video I posted of the lotus eaters doing the rounds with the normies not understanding population statistics. If the UK government was going to use the migrant population in any capacity to oppress everybody else, they're going to have to wait longer for the demographic change. However the WEF have got their 2030 timetable and I think they are scared of what Trump might do in revenge against them.
In terms of resistance? Look at London and the ULEZ cameras, we're British, we know how to quite literally dismantle the surveillance state if we really wanted to.
If you consider the facts that the term racism was popularized to be a weapon against White people and that "anti-racist" is code for "anti-White", it makes perfect sense. See also the stages of genocide.
I get you, I was raised to be colorblind too. Realizing just how many people, who I was raised to treat fairly, hate me simply for for being White was a difficult redpill to stomach.
I still see myself as colorblind in the sense that I’m not going to make a judgement about an individual solely based on race but I’m not blind to what goes on around me like I once was. I still try to be a good Christian
We aren't commanded to be doormats or pacifists, you know. There's nothing wrong with keeping your guard up when interacting with people from groups that typically hate the groups you belong to. While we're told to love our neighbor, we're also told the man who doesn't take care of his own household is worse than a nonbeliver.
Fitting that the one woman interviewed "feels that DEI is necessary" and demonstrates why it continues to thrive.
"I think the way in which this particular project was executed made more people feel excluded than included in these kinds of conversations and that’s the opposite of what we want."
Bitch, whether or not people "feel" included is not my business nor will it ever be. That's only the business of useless, pathos-driven women driven, the constitution of which, unfortunately, make up the majority of the HR and management staff of these institutions.
So a black person can be "imma kill your white ass. I hate white people and im gonna kill you and rape your wife and daughter because they are white. Im doing this because im racist against white people"... not motivated by racism.
These assholes are the same ones that write "believe all women" even when there is proof the woman maliciously made up a lie.
In Clownada, a court rules that an aboriginal woman screaming "I hate White people" as she punched a White woman in the face would not be charged with a hate crime because who could really know if that motivated her, or if it was simply a manifestation of systemic racism opressing the poor non-White in mysterious ways.
This assumption has been in operation for decades and is nothing new:
“People of color, as a social group, do not have the societal, institutional power to oppress white people as a group,” the training states. “An individual person of color abusing a white person – while clearly wrong, (no person should be insulted, hurt, etc.) is acting out a personal racial prejudice, not racism.”
The mealymouthed PR flak for U of W says:
I think the way in which this particular project was executed made more people feel excluded than included in these kinds of conversations and that’s the opposite of what we want.
The hivemind has no time for the individual. To them the individual is at all times operating under the abstract groups alleged assumptions.
This must be what it's like to think like an ant in an anthill, or a bee in a hive. But this disrespects ants and bees.
“We do not expect students to automatically accept the views expressed in the document referred to, any more than they would the reasoning of a legal brief, judicial opinion, or their professors,” the spokesperson said. “Intellectual and academic freedom are core values of the Law School.”
If you do not accept these beliefs, we will have struggle sessions with you until you do.
“Accordingly, we welcome and encourage vigorous debate over important questions of law and policy, and this session provided a forum for such discourse,” the spokesperson said.
Yes, please stick your neck out so we know who to protest, level false allegations against and eventually expel from university.
I posted this because I see many pRedditors deny that anyone ever claims this.
And here we see law students are taught this.
Imagine the damage to our legal system.
Meanwhile the only true measure of racism (interracial crime stats) show that almost all racism comes from blacks…
I believe I have an interesting counter: OK, people of color can't be racist against whites, however they can be racist++. See, racism++ is the same as racism, except that people of color can be racist towards whites. This obviously makes it worse, so why aren't we doing anything to fight racism++?
You won't ever be selected for jury duty. They will use a bunch of random chinks, niggers, spics, and kikes to convict you.
A jury of your "peers". Like we are equal to women and third world shit skins. How insulting.
Well if thats the case "hate" laws also have no grounds in an equal society.
Step 1- Introduce “hate” laws that force police to prioritize protecting certain groups.
Step 2- Defund the police so only priority crimes are ever solved.
Step 3- AGGRESSIVELY Prosecute self defense.
They never did, the fact that people even entertained their bullshit has been part of the problem. As far as I'm concerned the west is lost and I'm preparing accordingly.
Curious, what does preparing accordingly look like for you? As far as I can recall you're British so I'm curious what you plan on doing.
Well we can grow anything here, plenty of water to so living day to day actually isn't that much of a problem for us. Also stocking up on canned food etc. of course and exploring different possibilities for electricity generation. It all depends though on what the government does this year because it seems even by their standards their crazy is boiling over.
If law and order simply breaks down I actually think the infrastructure is going to be mostly fine, been wargaming it a bit going to have to wait and see as I've pointed out before.
Ah,I take it you just plan to move to, or already live in a rural area then, and plan to ride it out? Or did I misunderstand?
Lol No no, so I've got a property in a place I'm fairly comfortable, obviously won't reveal where exactly for doxxing reasons. It's got a sizeable garden and last year I successfully grew a bunch of vegetables no problem, in fact got bloody swamped with harvest so this year is probably going to be amazing. The Britain you see on television and everything with shitty block flats and horrid buildings are usually run down cities and towns, other places are villages etc. outside the city limits where it's very easy to take care of yourself if you really wanted to.
Food won't be a problem, should probably set up rain collection as well, the only way anything would be affected where I am is if the shit heads try to turn off the utilities and block everything off to 'punish' the population. However if they did that they'd be fucked because even the normies would be out in force.
I honestly don't know what the retards are thinking even suggesting conscription on public, it's a stupid idea. Which explains why even Sunak is probably immediately walking it all back. I mean they would if they could, but they probably have done wargaming on such a scenario as I have.
See, my concern wasn't food. It was defensibility. Much like my own, your government has imported millions of foreign barbarians to assist in oppressing you, and I was curious to what extent your nation was preparing to deal with such a thing.
Normally I would have zero faith in normies, but I think a lot of people would be surprised. I think a lot of people are only putting up with it because they still technically believe in the concept of law and order, once that breaks down well, gloves are off. It's worth pointing out that yes there is a sizeable Muslim population here, but they're not all a monolith, we've got Sikhs and Chinese too among others.
Going back to that video I posted of the lotus eaters doing the rounds with the normies not understanding population statistics. If the UK government was going to use the migrant population in any capacity to oppress everybody else, they're going to have to wait longer for the demographic change. However the WEF have got their 2030 timetable and I think they are scared of what Trump might do in revenge against them.
In terms of resistance? Look at London and the ULEZ cameras, we're British, we know how to quite literally dismantle the surveillance state if we really wanted to.
so you admit "racism" is a fake concept only intended to be used as a weapon against european diaspora.
Given that it was first popularized by Trotsky, that cat was out of the bag long ago.
Objectively false.
Corrollary: leftists cannot have civil societies.
Racism just means "White people are the Devil" now. If it ever meant anything else.
I hate this logic. Makes zero sense
If you consider the facts that the term racism was popularized to be a weapon against White people and that "anti-racist" is code for "anti-White", it makes perfect sense. See also the stages of genocide.
I get that but I guess it really annoys me because it goes against everything I was raised to believe
I get you, I was raised to be colorblind too. Realizing just how many people, who I was raised to treat fairly, hate me simply for for being White was a difficult redpill to stomach.
I still judge people as individuals but I'm definitely no longer colorblind.
I still see myself as colorblind in the sense that I’m not going to make a judgement about an individual solely based on race but I’m not blind to what goes on around me like I once was. I still try to be a good Christian
We aren't commanded to be doormats or pacifists, you know. There's nothing wrong with keeping your guard up when interacting with people from groups that typically hate the groups you belong to. While we're told to love our neighbor, we're also told the man who doesn't take care of his own household is worse than a nonbeliver.
I know but just in the sense of the individual. I want to give people a chance but you do have to be guarded in certain situations
Also any time somebody talks about "people of color" rephrase it as "anti-white" in your response. Because that's what it means.
Fitting that the one woman interviewed "feels that DEI is necessary" and demonstrates why it continues to thrive.
Bitch, whether or not people "feel" included is not my business nor will it ever be. That's only the business of useless, pathos-driven women driven, the constitution of which, unfortunately, make up the majority of the HR and management staff of these institutions.
So a black person can be "imma kill your white ass. I hate white people and im gonna kill you and rape your wife and daughter because they are white. Im doing this because im racist against white people"... not motivated by racism.
These assholes are the same ones that write "believe all women" even when there is proof the woman maliciously made up a lie.
In Clownada, a court rules that an aboriginal woman screaming "I hate White people" as she punched a White woman in the face would not be charged with a hate crime because who could really know if that motivated her, or if it was simply a manifestation of systemic racism opressing the poor non-White in mysterious ways.
This assumption has been in operation for decades and is nothing new:
The mealymouthed PR flak for U of W says:
The hivemind has no time for the individual. To them the individual is at all times operating under the abstract groups alleged assumptions.
This must be what it's like to think like an ant in an anthill, or a bee in a hive. But this disrespects ants and bees.
If you do not accept these beliefs, we will have struggle sessions with you until you do.
Yes, please stick your neck out so we know who to protest, level false allegations against and eventually expel from university.