You made quite a specific claim, namely that Israel got its nukes from Julius Rosenberg. You were not able to back up that claim (which is chronologically absurd anyway), so you started wildly flailing about.
Though quite an admirable attempt at shifting the goalposts.
It wasn’t a “talk” about “Julius Rosenberg” and you know that. It was a list of jewish subversions of the west. The first being the USS Liberty, the second being the spate of nuke thieves, and the third being the mossad child rape blackmail ring.
It wasn’t a “talk” about “Julius Rosenberg” and you know that.
You specifically mentioned him, as well as his wife and one guy who left the US in the early 1950s. The idea that Israel got its nuclear weapons from them is pretty ridiculous, and you know it.
The first being the USS Liberty, the second being the spate of nuke thieves
Wait, you think the Rosenbergs came after the USS Liberty incident? Figures. If you had a basic understanding of history, you wouldn't be embarrassing yourself like this.
You can’t help but lie. All the facts of the conversation are there for everyone to read. I’ll let them do so instead of wasting my time and the thread on debating a cup of slime.
Well yeah, you did me the favor by posting the conversation, which showed that things happened precisely as I said they did. And you don't want to "waste your time" because you're not doing too well. You keep trying though, and then exiting with your tail between your legs.
For any other readers who don't want to wade into yet another Antonio slap fight:
Fact check: false.
Where do you think israel got their nukes lmfao
That's an assumption by you that he meant that the Rosenbergs were the source of the nuclear information. It could have meant that but you never bothered to clarify and instead just claimed victory on the thread, as you are wont to do.
C'mon, you can be a little honest - even if you blame a 'slapfight' on the one who was taunted in this very thread. I said "from Julius Rosenberg lmfao?" - and he never bothered to clarify, as you say...
Guy literally cited spies for the USSR and then said "where do you think Israel got its nukes"...
Correct, you're under no obligation to answer a question that even the guy who was defending you said was something you 'could have meant'. (In fact, you're under no obligation to make good arguments, and you never do!)
But it sure clarifies things when you don't, and want to talk about literally anything other than your claim that Israel got its nuclear weapons from spies for the USSR.
So where did israel get their nukes if not jew nuke spies? You seem convinced that isn’t the case, so you clearly must have a superior explanation. Let’s hear it.
And while you’re at it, explain the murder of US sailors and the rape of US children for israel.
That is a good question, one that you haven't even come close to answering.
You seem convinced that isn’t the case
I'm convinced that you are wrong that spies for the USSR gave Israel a bomb that it only developed two decades or so later. Can you cite actual "Jew spies" who spied for Israel, not the USSR, in a relevant timeperiod, not decades before, and who demonstrably contribute to the Israeli development of nukes?
And while you’re at it, explain the murder of US sailors and the rape of US children for israel.
If at first your red herring doesn't work, try two others.
There are a lot of Asians on this forum and there are a lot of Asians who dont like jews .I dont know why you act like Whites are the only people who dont like jews .
Not smarter, your kind is just more willing to help their fellow brethren no matter the cost. It doesn't matter if that chosen is rapist or pedo, the shlomo has to be protected like Les Wexner or James Alefantis.
They likely are. Using my same reasoning process about selection pressure, the jews have had no homeland of their own for most of their existence. They've existed by infiltrating and manipulating other cultures, living off of them parasitically. Being found out or expelled from the host society leads to great suffering and death for them. That puts a huge selection pressure on the ability to manipulate and maintain a complex network of lies. That takes intelligence. It also leads to elevated neurotic behavior and psychological illness, which has been medically documented amongst the jews.
Today on KIA2 drama: u/AntonioOfVenice takes a massive ratio cock up his ass for the hundredth time, with special guest, 10 hour old handshake faggot u/ifunniuser.
The percentage of the U.S. population is irrelevant, because most Americans are not in a position to be an atomic spy. Given that the two most notable atomic scientists - Einstein and Oppenheimer - were also Jews, it is predictable that there were more Jewish atomic spies than African-American atomic spies, for example.
Communism is the bastard son of Judaism so I would still expect communist spies to be more likely to be Jews, but Jews being more likely to possess the access to become spies is an important mitigating factor for your statistic.
The dominance of the nuclear program by jews raises its own host of questions - though as you point out it likely mitigates to some degree the utter absurdity of the titular statistical discrepancy. To a significant enough degree that it invalidates the thrust of the post? - don’t see anything close
u/AntonioOfVenice doesn’t think this indicates anything regarding subversion of the west by outside malefactors
Hey toni, who was epstain collecting his blackmail for?
You made quite a specific claim, namely that Israel got its nukes from Julius Rosenberg. You were not able to back up that claim (which is chronologically absurd anyway), so you started wildly flailing about.
Though quite an admirable attempt at shifting the goalposts.
I actually didn’t make that claim you weasel, in fact you did, but it’s entirely expected you would attempt to lie to cover for your subversion:
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/17s5tjudPQ/very-interesting-stats-heret/c/4Z8iUCDN6zx
I am weasel?
Disagreeing with you is subversion? Come now.
Also, your link shows exactly what I said. In response to the talk about Julius Rosenberg, you said:
The 'lmfao' was a particularly nice touch.
It wasn’t a “talk” about “Julius Rosenberg” and you know that. It was a list of jewish subversions of the west. The first being the USS Liberty, the second being the spate of nuke thieves, and the third being the mossad child rape blackmail ring.
Lmfao.
And yea, you are weasel.
You specifically mentioned him, as well as his wife and one guy who left the US in the early 1950s. The idea that Israel got its nuclear weapons from them is pretty ridiculous, and you know it.
Wait, you think the Rosenbergs came after the USS Liberty incident? Figures. If you had a basic understanding of history, you wouldn't be embarrassing yourself like this.
I guess that makes you a baboon.
You can’t help but lie. All the facts of the conversation are there for everyone to read. I’ll let them do so instead of wasting my time and the thread on debating a cup of slime.
Well yeah, you did me the favor by posting the conversation, which showed that things happened precisely as I said they did. And you don't want to "waste your time" because you're not doing too well. You keep trying though, and then exiting with your tail between your legs.
For any other readers who don't want to wade into yet another Antonio slap fight:
Fact check: false.
That's an assumption by you that he meant that the Rosenbergs were the source of the nuclear information. It could have meant that but you never bothered to clarify and instead just claimed victory on the thread, as you are wont to do.
C'mon, you can be a little honest - even if you blame a 'slapfight' on the one who was taunted in this very thread. I said "from Julius Rosenberg lmfao?" - and he never bothered to clarify, as you say...
Guy literally cited spies for the USSR and then said "where do you think Israel got its nukes"...
I’m under no obligation to correct you every time you pull another lie or willful misinterpretation out of your stretched and starched sphincter
Correct, you're under no obligation to answer a question that even the guy who was defending you said was something you 'could have meant'. (In fact, you're under no obligation to make good arguments, and you never do!)
But it sure clarifies things when you don't, and want to talk about literally anything other than your claim that Israel got its nuclear weapons from spies for the USSR.
So where did israel get their nukes if not jew nuke spies? You seem convinced that isn’t the case, so you clearly must have a superior explanation. Let’s hear it.
And while you’re at it, explain the murder of US sailors and the rape of US children for israel.
That is a good question, one that you haven't even come close to answering.
I'm convinced that you are wrong that spies for the USSR gave Israel a bomb that it only developed two decades or so later. Can you cite actual "Jew spies" who spied for Israel, not the USSR, in a relevant timeperiod, not decades before, and who demonstrably contribute to the Israeli development of nukes?
If at first your red herring doesn't work, try two others.
Video of AntonioOfVenice emerging from the depths to defend the Chosen People
Comment Reported for: Rule 12: Falsehoods
Comment Approved: This is an argument.
Being scheming and conniving spies is not being "smart" its called being lowly snakes.
Handshake ✅
Spells like a faggout ✅
Shabbos goy ✅
Oh hi Imp!
Yeah it’s crazy, it’s like you’re an amalgam of all the braindead shills on the site, which explains the handshake
Hey look it’s that autistic faggot who doesn’t know what per capita means!
There are a lot of Asians on this forum and there are a lot of Asians who dont like jews .I dont know why you act like Whites are the only people who dont like jews .
Yeah and?
Not smarter, your kind is just more willing to help their fellow brethren no matter the cost. It doesn't matter if that chosen is rapist or pedo, the shlomo has to be protected like Les Wexner or James Alefantis.
Quoting my post from the last time this midwit gotcha was trotted out. https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16bPH1xJ8U/x/c/4TtsY0rC4FM
They likely are. Using my same reasoning process about selection pressure, the jews have had no homeland of their own for most of their existence. They've existed by infiltrating and manipulating other cultures, living off of them parasitically. Being found out or expelled from the host society leads to great suffering and death for them. That puts a huge selection pressure on the ability to manipulate and maintain a complex network of lies. That takes intelligence. It also leads to elevated neurotic behavior and psychological illness, which has been medically documented amongst the jews.
>idiots
Imagine not being able to read.
Today on KIA2 drama: u/AntonioOfVenice takes a massive ratio cock up his ass for the hundredth time, with special guest, 10 hour old handshake faggot u/ifunniuser.
Safest bet in history, next to Epstein not killing himself and the WEF going full civil world with itself if they get all of the world.
This stupid site is just some variation of the simpsons monkey gambling meme between a random user and one of Imp/Antonio every other day.
They were perfectly happy to nuke Germany if they got the chance, once Russia was the bad guy they all became humanitarians.
The percentage of the U.S. population is irrelevant, because most Americans are not in a position to be an atomic spy. Given that the two most notable atomic scientists - Einstein and Oppenheimer - were also Jews, it is predictable that there were more Jewish atomic spies than African-American atomic spies, for example.
Communism is the bastard son of Judaism so I would still expect communist spies to be more likely to be Jews, but Jews being more likely to possess the access to become spies is an important mitigating factor for your statistic.
The dominance of the nuclear program by jews raises its own host of questions - though as you point out it likely mitigates to some degree the utter absurdity of the titular statistical discrepancy. To a significant enough degree that it invalidates the thrust of the post? - don’t see anything close