You made quite a specific claim, namely that Israel got its nukes from Julius Rosenberg. You were not able to back up that claim (which is chronologically absurd anyway), so you started wildly flailing about.
Though quite an admirable attempt at shifting the goalposts.
It wasn’t a “talk” about “Julius Rosenberg” and you know that. It was a list of jewish subversions of the west. The first being the USS Liberty, the second being the spate of nuke thieves, and the third being the mossad child rape blackmail ring.
It wasn’t a “talk” about “Julius Rosenberg” and you know that.
You specifically mentioned him, as well as his wife and one guy who left the US in the early 1950s. The idea that Israel got its nuclear weapons from them is pretty ridiculous, and you know it.
The first being the USS Liberty, the second being the spate of nuke thieves
Wait, you think the Rosenbergs came after the USS Liberty incident? Figures. If you had a basic understanding of history, you wouldn't be embarrassing yourself like this.
For any other readers who don't want to wade into yet another Antonio slap fight:
Fact check: false.
Where do you think israel got their nukes lmfao
That's an assumption by you that he meant that the Rosenbergs were the source of the nuclear information. It could have meant that but you never bothered to clarify and instead just claimed victory on the thread, as you are wont to do.
C'mon, you can be a little honest - even if you blame a 'slapfight' on the one who was taunted in this very thread. I said "from Julius Rosenberg lmfao?" - and he never bothered to clarify, as you say...
Guy literally cited spies for the USSR and then said "where do you think Israel got its nukes"...
Correct, you're under no obligation to answer a question that even the guy who was defending you said was something you 'could have meant'. (In fact, you're under no obligation to make good arguments, and you never do!)
But it sure clarifies things when you don't, and want to talk about literally anything other than your claim that Israel got its nuclear weapons from spies for the USSR.
You made quite a specific claim, namely that Israel got its nukes from Julius Rosenberg. You were not able to back up that claim (which is chronologically absurd anyway), so you started wildly flailing about.
Though quite an admirable attempt at shifting the goalposts.
I actually didn’t make that claim you weasel, in fact you did, but it’s entirely expected you would attempt to lie to cover for your subversion:
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/17s5tjudPQ/very-interesting-stats-heret/c/4Z8iUCDN6zx
I am weasel?
Disagreeing with you is subversion? Come now.
Also, your link shows exactly what I said. In response to the talk about Julius Rosenberg, you said:
The 'lmfao' was a particularly nice touch.
It wasn’t a “talk” about “Julius Rosenberg” and you know that. It was a list of jewish subversions of the west. The first being the USS Liberty, the second being the spate of nuke thieves, and the third being the mossad child rape blackmail ring.
Lmfao.
And yea, you are weasel.
You specifically mentioned him, as well as his wife and one guy who left the US in the early 1950s. The idea that Israel got its nuclear weapons from them is pretty ridiculous, and you know it.
Wait, you think the Rosenbergs came after the USS Liberty incident? Figures. If you had a basic understanding of history, you wouldn't be embarrassing yourself like this.
I guess that makes you a baboon.
For any other readers who don't want to wade into yet another Antonio slap fight:
Fact check: false.
That's an assumption by you that he meant that the Rosenbergs were the source of the nuclear information. It could have meant that but you never bothered to clarify and instead just claimed victory on the thread, as you are wont to do.
C'mon, you can be a little honest - even if you blame a 'slapfight' on the one who was taunted in this very thread. I said "from Julius Rosenberg lmfao?" - and he never bothered to clarify, as you say...
Guy literally cited spies for the USSR and then said "where do you think Israel got its nukes"...
I’m under no obligation to correct you every time you pull another lie or willful misinterpretation out of your stretched and starched sphincter
Correct, you're under no obligation to answer a question that even the guy who was defending you said was something you 'could have meant'. (In fact, you're under no obligation to make good arguments, and you never do!)
But it sure clarifies things when you don't, and want to talk about literally anything other than your claim that Israel got its nuclear weapons from spies for the USSR.
Video of AntonioOfVenice emerging from the depths to defend the Chosen People
Comment Reported for: Rule 12: Falsehoods
Comment Approved: This is an argument.