For any other readers who don't want to wade into yet another Antonio slap fight:
Fact check: false.
Where do you think israel got their nukes lmfao
That's an assumption by you that he meant that the Rosenbergs were the source of the nuclear information. It could have meant that but you never bothered to clarify and instead just claimed victory on the thread, as you are wont to do.
C'mon, you can be a little honest - even if you blame a 'slapfight' on the one who was taunted in this very thread. I said "from Julius Rosenberg lmfao?" - and he never bothered to clarify, as you say...
Guy literally cited spies for the USSR and then said "where do you think Israel got its nukes"...
Correct, you're under no obligation to answer a question that even the guy who was defending you said was something you 'could have meant'. (In fact, you're under no obligation to make good arguments, and you never do!)
But it sure clarifies things when you don't, and want to talk about literally anything other than your claim that Israel got its nuclear weapons from spies for the USSR.
So where did israel get their nukes if not jew nuke spies? You seem convinced that isn’t the case, so you clearly must have a superior explanation. Let’s hear it.
And while you’re at it, explain the murder of US sailors and the rape of US children for israel.
For any other readers who don't want to wade into yet another Antonio slap fight:
Fact check: false.
That's an assumption by you that he meant that the Rosenbergs were the source of the nuclear information. It could have meant that but you never bothered to clarify and instead just claimed victory on the thread, as you are wont to do.
C'mon, you can be a little honest - even if you blame a 'slapfight' on the one who was taunted in this very thread. I said "from Julius Rosenberg lmfao?" - and he never bothered to clarify, as you say...
Guy literally cited spies for the USSR and then said "where do you think Israel got its nukes"...
I’m under no obligation to correct you every time you pull another lie or willful misinterpretation out of your stretched and starched sphincter
Correct, you're under no obligation to answer a question that even the guy who was defending you said was something you 'could have meant'. (In fact, you're under no obligation to make good arguments, and you never do!)
But it sure clarifies things when you don't, and want to talk about literally anything other than your claim that Israel got its nuclear weapons from spies for the USSR.
So where did israel get their nukes if not jew nuke spies? You seem convinced that isn’t the case, so you clearly must have a superior explanation. Let’s hear it.
And while you’re at it, explain the murder of US sailors and the rape of US children for israel.