The Church NGO human trafficking should have been one of the biggest scandals in modern history, instead we get “no person is illegal” and “don’t separate families” being spewed by the “religious” socialists.
Why are police allowed to take a second job as a security officer while continuing to wear their police uniform and carry their issued sidearm? You can't grab a gun out of the armory, don your uniform, and freelance if you're in the armed forces.
It is a huge thing for police. Off duty cops are hired at all sorts of things, and only become on duty if they aren't someone. They don't want to do this because the pay is worse as an officer.
Oh, I know. Sorry, it was a rhetorical question to point out the absurdity that the practice is allowed.
The official justification is that they are only enforcing the same laws they would when on duty, so there's no conflict of interest. This is a lie, as they're only enforcing the laws that the entity that hired them wants them to, and they are ignoring all other violations- as in this example, where they are ignoring illegal immigrants that they would have reported immigration had they encountered them in the course of their regular duties.
To do otherwise means that they will be fired from that off-duty job. So you basically have someone wearing the uniform of San antonio, representing themselves as enforcing the laws of San Antonio and Texas, but really only enforcing the laws that Catholic Charities wants them to.
I don't actually have a problem with off-duty cops being security guards. The job is open to them the same as anyone else, but they should be required to leave their uniform,.gun, and badge at home because they are not acting in official capacity and are not representing the government when serving as a security guard.
You got the upper Clergy of Catholism that have never liked that the United States has never been under Vatican control. Course they are burning down their own house for a power play.
I'd assert that the Vatican's credentials as Catholic are questionable given their actions, or more specifically the Pope's actions over the last several years.
The Second Vatican Council and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Investing the authority of the church in a group of people unaccountable to the body or the Word made that sort of thing inevitable eventually.
The Church NGO human trafficking should have been one of the biggest scandals in modern history, instead we get “no person is illegal” and “don’t separate families” being spewed by the “religious” socialists.
Why are police allowed to take a second job as a security officer while continuing to wear their police uniform and carry their issued sidearm? You can't grab a gun out of the armory, don your uniform, and freelance if you're in the armed forces.
It is a huge thing for police. Off duty cops are hired at all sorts of things, and only become on duty if they aren't someone. They don't want to do this because the pay is worse as an officer.
Oh, I know. Sorry, it was a rhetorical question to point out the absurdity that the practice is allowed.
The official justification is that they are only enforcing the same laws they would when on duty, so there's no conflict of interest. This is a lie, as they're only enforcing the laws that the entity that hired them wants them to, and they are ignoring all other violations- as in this example, where they are ignoring illegal immigrants that they would have reported immigration had they encountered them in the course of their regular duties.
To do otherwise means that they will be fired from that off-duty job. So you basically have someone wearing the uniform of San antonio, representing themselves as enforcing the laws of San Antonio and Texas, but really only enforcing the laws that Catholic Charities wants them to.
I don't actually have a problem with off-duty cops being security guards. The job is open to them the same as anyone else, but they should be required to leave their uniform,.gun, and badge at home because they are not acting in official capacity and are not representing the government when serving as a security guard.
The church must be stopped.
Signed, a Catholic.
You got the upper Clergy of Catholism that have never liked that the United States has never been under Vatican control. Course they are burning down their own house for a power play.
Yet
Deus vult
I'd assert that the Vatican's credentials as Catholic are questionable given their actions, or more specifically the Pope's actions over the last several years.
People don't know how much that the Vatican hates the US. Number of the founding Colonies of the US come from movements that fled the Church.
guarding the facility to ensure no one exits into the us, right? right??