Chivalry was always slavery. It is based on the idea that women deserve considerations they haven't earned, and that men owe them special treatment on principle.
It came with the notion of women being delicate, care giving, loving etc It was not unearned as much as exaggerated and idealistic, Feminism killed that aspect of women entirely.
I'm not sure there's any evidence that women ever fulfilled that stereotype. There were civilizational reasons to sacrifice men's lives and welfare in order to protect women for as long as life was short enough and brutal enough that there was a real danger of a population collapse if women's reproductive value was not preserved. But that has not been true for centuries, and the more freedom women are given, the more they are at liberty to shamelessly display what has always been their true nature.
Nobody here is saying there were never shit women who didn't fulfil the expectations of their role, but at least there was a societal expectation. Women could then be judged on their behaviour- usually by other women- for not meeting those expectations.
He is not wrong, feminism + chivalry is just slavery
Chivalry was always slavery. It is based on the idea that women deserve considerations they haven't earned, and that men owe them special treatment on principle.
It came with the notion of women being delicate, care giving, loving etc It was not unearned as much as exaggerated and idealistic, Feminism killed that aspect of women entirely.
I'm not sure there's any evidence that women ever fulfilled that stereotype. There were civilizational reasons to sacrifice men's lives and welfare in order to protect women for as long as life was short enough and brutal enough that there was a real danger of a population collapse if women's reproductive value was not preserved. But that has not been true for centuries, and the more freedom women are given, the more they are at liberty to shamelessly display what has always been their true nature.
Nobody here is saying there were never shit women who didn't fulfil the expectations of their role, but at least there was a societal expectation. Women could then be judged on their behaviour- usually by other women- for not meeting those expectations.
What will work, Imp? Tell us
Context? No, that's too much work.
It seems to have started with this tweet about that bisexual chick suddenly declaring herself a reformed feminist after dating a "real man".
The TL;DR seems to be lots of women REEEing that Matt Walsh called them out as hypocrite girl bosses who still expect for men to pay for meals.
Walsh said "plenty of people" not just women though.
He's been arguing with megyn Kelley about something. That's all i know
You think Jews are better off if their men and women work together so you don't entirely disagree.
Being pro-Israel only makes sense if you believe that.