Imp, that's like Jester saying you shouldn't question his motives when talking about an alleged Hamas attack.
You're not always wrong, but you are literally the last person on this forum that I would ever go to for an unbiased take on any event pertaining to women/feminism.
Nobody misses Nick Fuentes and his dumb fucking takes about racial unity while being literally not even white. It's performative garbage, and it's stealing President Trump's slogan.
Calling to kill everyone who isn't a tradcuck isn't speech.
Sure it is, unless you think it's actually actionable. You really think "kill all non tradcucks" is going to lead a reasonable person to violence? Or even an unreasonable one? And if you're saying that isn't free speech, I suppose you don't have a problem with R16 here, right? (Which, for the record, I think is an absolutely retarded rule.)
Also, considering your side abuse reports here to get rid of me constantly, bot downvotes against me and more, I don't know how you even speak here.
There are no bot downvotes. People don't like you, or don't like your takes, and downvote accordingly. Sometimes even unfairly, I'll grant. I see some of your comments get downvoted, and don't think you deserved it. I see some of your other comments get downvoted, and think 'what a retard.' Regardless, I highly doubt any automated system (i.e. bots) is in play. Also, I think you have been treated unfairly by the mods. I've never reported you myself (I think the only person I've reported is that weird autist who creates new accounts to spam that 'enlightenment pls gib money' crazy shit), and I think your bans have been incredibly excessive.
I disagree with you on a shit ton, and the stuff I do agree with you on I think you usually take to extremes that I don't agree with, but I've never wanted you gone. Some people here probably do, but it's not because they view you as a threat, it's because they view you and your single-minded obsessions as annoying.
TheImp is a walking R16 violation though. The only way he is going to be able to say what he really wants to is if the rule goes. I don't think Dom targets him. If anything Dom, treats him with kid gloves. Are you aware of the bullshit Dom pulled to justify banning me?
First, he treated me joking about burning furry porn as a R2 violation.
Then, he treated me linking to a R16 compliant article about black-on-white crime as an R16 violation strictly because of the source, not the article contents. Then, he treated me reposting the article's contents without linking to the source as an R16 violation.
Also, I think you have been treated unfairly by the mods.
He's unfairly treated by the mods, but he's fine with people being banned for opinions he doesn't like. In that respect, I'm fine with him being held to his own standard.
He isn't the only person banned. People have been getting banned for offending trannies in various ways this whole time. Other White nationalists have been banned. Even Andrew "Incel Pride" Anglin got banned, not exactly a "tradcuck." Alex Jones only recently got unbanned.
Here is our resident neoliberal chicken hawk getting banned, complete with me giving a similar "no shit" response as I did here.
I knew you hated "stormfaggots," but this absurd, even for you.
Banning people you hate = free speech. Banning retards (I assume, since you agree with them and still said they had dumb takes) who agree with you = free speech is over, Elon is a liar.
At least I'm consistent. I think the most insane elements of the far right and far left should be allowed on Twitter, unless they're engaging in explicitly illegal activity. Nick Fuentes should come back. So should Louis Farrakhan.
Stormfaggots are a red line for the vast majority of people, and kill every platform they touch.
"If you can't handle me at my stormfaggotiest, you don't deserve me at my best." - Mahatma Gandhi.
On a more serious not, the inverse also hold true. Neo-Nazis are the canary in the coalmine of free speech.
It makes sense to not allow them on the platform...
If you're just talking pragmatically, it would make sense to just keep letting the left run everything, with their Marxist and, yes, antimale agenda. The advertising money favors that at present. If we're just talking about what "makes sense," it makes sense to kick you, or me, or anyone here, off every platform.
The only reason Twitter let up censorship at all is to get radicalizing people back onto a controlled platform. Relegating them all to alt-tech just left basic bitch conservatives banned for saying mundane stuff like "there are only two genders!" hanging out with people like us unsupervised.
I've been through enough AVFM and other retarded MRAs to need more than just a name to think these guy isn't just contributing to the Feminist Cause through milquetoast compromise and controlled opposition.
Its the same old "feminism worked, so just repeat what they did" game MRAs have been trying for decades. Its what MGTOWs did, its what TRP did, its what AVFM and all the other MRAs of the 00s did. Just repeat different facets of feminism and hope it works this time.
Its why all their movements fail, because no one gives a shit about men or what they do until it reaches a critical mass of effecting society that none of those groups will ever accomplish. We are disposable and we always will be, our suffering is lesser and our tears make people disgusted with us. Trying to weaponize that is forever a losing battle.
Their movements fail because the ruling class doesn't support them. People think the left had some secret sauce strategy that they try to replicate. The strategy is just "have the support of the ruling class."
That said, I think alt-queer theory garbage is going to emerge even if it's not tactical. It's the end point of liberalism, and most of the manosphere are just (sometimes female exclusionary) liberals.
You can't just have the support of the ruling class, else we would have had a Hillary president. You also need to be able to pull the populace in with something.
Crying women is easy to get people on board with, as is their pain and suffering something we instinctually seek to assuage. Men have nothing of the sort in their pocket.
I also think most of the manosphere ends up closer to the Left-Leaning Libertarian side, which is far worse because they want contradictory positions they don't even know are exclusive.
Could you explain what women are again? It seemed clear until you insisted that Jewish women were to be trusted when claiming they were raped and also were worth dying to defend.
I didn't insist anything. What I said was that it was interesting how the women's movement ditched the "believe women" cause when they actually had people with evidence.
Because MeToo was always just a way to acquire power through a coup of the entertainment industry and whatever other fields they could get into. That's all it ever was. It was never about "justice", it was about female power.
Believing Israel wouldn't give them any power, so they ditched it.
You said women ditched Israel because it wouldn't help their conspiracy to get power. I'm pointing out that makes no sense by listing three turbo Zionists who you label as women's shills, two of which are women themselves.
I magically believe every Jewish woman is good, or even any.
But you do. You must. Supporting Jewish nationalism as you do makes no sense if you don't. As I've previously pointed out, you've spared Jewish women the usual accusations of being traitors to their men. You are very aggressive in pushing the opposite perception of gentile, especially White, women.
If someone even breathes in the direction of suggesting that White men and women have a shared interest in opposing mass immigration, you will have a reply posted in a millisecond accusing White women of being traitors and our enemy. You don't do that to Jews.
It's as if you want Whites divided but not Jews. I find that very interesting.
It's almost like to take over the right, you have to align some of your policies with what they want?
Supporting Jewish nationalism as you do makes no sense if you don't
I just support them against the terrorists. I'm not going to move to Israel. (I don't think non-Jews even can)
suggesting that White men and women have a shared interest in opposing mass immigration, you will have a reply posted in a millisecond accusing White women of being traitors and our enemy.
Women : "Look, the black people are taking your jobs"
Sounds like he isn't right about anything, as he is still trying to play the "we can be EQUALS!" game by letting them have opinions and falling for their "I just care soooooo much about men's plights, I'm not like other girls."
Does he also think Karen Straughan is a brilliant leader for men? That's all I need to complete the set.
Feminists tend to run censorship divisions at corporations. Women love censorship. Absolutely love it. Women don't like free speech.
It might not be X and Musk doing things but some of the drones that work at X. I'd try to appeal and make a big deal about it.
However, Musk is a huge simp. Huge. The level of simping that Musk does is off the charts. So Musk siding with feminists and hating on men is par for the course.
I've only just woken up and this thread is already enough retardedness for the day. I'm going back to cleaning up the vomit my dog decided to wake me up with.
You'd need to post proof of that being the case here Imp. A handle connected to an account does not make for evidence of your claim.
Any archives from this account showing that they are countering feminist propaganda?
The fact I'm saying it should be enough.
But yeah...it's just an account I've interacted with a lot. It was a more mellowed out version of myself.
You are not trustworthy.
#MeToo
Kek.
I believe that you genuinely believe everything you say.
Which is why I give you very little credibility.
Imp, that's like Jester saying you shouldn't question his motives when talking about an alleged Hamas attack.
You're not always wrong, but you are literally the last person on this forum that I would ever go to for an unbiased take on any event pertaining to women/feminism.
I'll take your word for it Imp 😉
Musk has been banning people this whole time dumbass.
Just stormfaggots. They don't count.
Nobody misses Nick Fuentes and his dumb fucking takes about racial unity while being literally not even white. It's performative garbage, and it's stealing President Trump's slogan.
"It's not free speech if I don't like them."
Calling to kill everyone who isn't a tradcuck isn't speech.
Also, considering your side abuse reports here to get rid of me constantly, bot downvotes against me and more, I don't know how you even speak here.
Sure it is, unless you think it's actually actionable. You really think "kill all non tradcucks" is going to lead a reasonable person to violence? Or even an unreasonable one? And if you're saying that isn't free speech, I suppose you don't have a problem with R16 here, right? (Which, for the record, I think is an absolutely retarded rule.)
There are no bot downvotes. People don't like you, or don't like your takes, and downvote accordingly. Sometimes even unfairly, I'll grant. I see some of your comments get downvoted, and don't think you deserved it. I see some of your other comments get downvoted, and think 'what a retard.' Regardless, I highly doubt any automated system (i.e. bots) is in play. Also, I think you have been treated unfairly by the mods. I've never reported you myself (I think the only person I've reported is that weird autist who creates new accounts to spam that 'enlightenment pls gib money' crazy shit), and I think your bans have been incredibly excessive.
I disagree with you on a shit ton, and the stuff I do agree with you on I think you usually take to extremes that I don't agree with, but I've never wanted you gone. Some people here probably do, but it's not because they view you as a threat, it's because they view you and your single-minded obsessions as annoying.
TheImp is a walking R16 violation though. The only way he is going to be able to say what he really wants to is if the rule goes. I don't think Dom targets him. If anything Dom, treats him with kid gloves. Are you aware of the bullshit Dom pulled to justify banning me?
R16 shouldn't exist, and only does because the mods here are ride or die redditors.
I'm not, I don't follow all the drama. But I can imagine it was bad. Jannies gonna janny. What happened?
First, he treated me joking about burning furry porn as a R2 violation.
Then, he treated me linking to a R16 compliant article about black-on-white crime as an R16 violation strictly because of the source, not the article contents. Then, he treated me reposting the article's contents without linking to the source as an R16 violation.
He's unfairly treated by the mods, but he's fine with people being banned for opinions he doesn't like. In that respect, I'm fine with him being held to his own standard.
Who the fuck does that, you screeching retard?
ETA:
Our guys get falsely reported constantly, and Dom is biased against us. Cry me a river, faggot.
Fuentes did.
He isn't the only person banned. People have been getting banned for offending trannies in various ways this whole time. Other White nationalists have been banned. Even Andrew "Incel Pride" Anglin got banned, not exactly a "tradcuck." Alex Jones only recently got unbanned.
Here is our resident neoliberal chicken hawk getting banned, complete with me giving a similar "no shit" response as I did here.
https://scored.co/c/KotakuInAction2/p/17rSV9ulfQ/permanently-banned-from-twitter-/c
Lol
Satan recoils and lashes out at Allah the just and merciful. I foretold the corruption of the west
It's true. I saw it in a fortune cookie.
I knew you hated "stormfaggots," but this absurd, even for you.
Banning people you hate = free speech. Banning retards (I assume, since you agree with them and still said they had dumb takes) who agree with you = free speech is over, Elon is a liar.
At least I'm consistent. I think the most insane elements of the far right and far left should be allowed on Twitter, unless they're engaging in explicitly illegal activity. Nick Fuentes should come back. So should Louis Farrakhan.
It's not as ridiculous as it sounds. Stormfaggots are a red line for the vast majority of people, and kill every platform they touch.
It makes sense to not allow them on the platform, and I'd kick the feminists off into the same corner.
"If you can't handle me at my stormfaggotiest, you don't deserve me at my best." - Mahatma Gandhi.
On a more serious not, the inverse also hold true. Neo-Nazis are the canary in the coalmine of free speech.
If you're just talking pragmatically, it would make sense to just keep letting the left run everything, with their Marxist and, yes, antimale agenda. The advertising money favors that at present. If we're just talking about what "makes sense," it makes sense to kick you, or me, or anyone here, off every platform.
The only reason Twitter let up censorship at all is to get radicalizing people back onto a controlled platform. Relegating them all to alt-tech just left basic bitch conservatives banned for saying mundane stuff like "there are only two genders!" hanging out with people like us unsupervised.
Dude, they should have just let me play vidya.
They really should have. If video games sucked less, many of us wouldn't be here.
I've been through enough AVFM and other retarded MRAs to need more than just a name to think these guy isn't just contributing to the Feminist Cause through milquetoast compromise and controlled opposition.
"Gender Studies for Men" sounds like some alt-queer theorist garbage, but that does seem to be the direction the non-trad "manosphere" is going.
Its the same old "feminism worked, so just repeat what they did" game MRAs have been trying for decades. Its what MGTOWs did, its what TRP did, its what AVFM and all the other MRAs of the 00s did. Just repeat different facets of feminism and hope it works this time.
Its why all their movements fail, because no one gives a shit about men or what they do until it reaches a critical mass of effecting society that none of those groups will ever accomplish. We are disposable and we always will be, our suffering is lesser and our tears make people disgusted with us. Trying to weaponize that is forever a losing battle.
Their movements fail because the ruling class doesn't support them. People think the left had some secret sauce strategy that they try to replicate. The strategy is just "have the support of the ruling class."
That said, I think alt-queer theory garbage is going to emerge even if it's not tactical. It's the end point of liberalism, and most of the manosphere are just (sometimes female exclusionary) liberals.
You can't just have the support of the ruling class, else we would have had a Hillary president. You also need to be able to pull the populace in with something.
Crying women is easy to get people on board with, as is their pain and suffering something we instinctually seek to assuage. Men have nothing of the sort in their pocket.
I also think most of the manosphere ends up closer to the Left-Leaning Libertarian side, which is far worse because they want contradictory positions they don't even know are exclusive.
Surprised it's not called "Gender Studies for Trans Women uwu" or some shit
I've interacted with this user on X a lot. Probably should have archived something.
He has some some dumb takes, but is mostly correct about what women are.
Sadly, the only archive is just a stream of reposts.
https://archive.is/7WBT7
I just noticed that account retweeted Abby Shapiro. No wonder you like it so much.
Actually, I think it was seven million.
My wife is a doctor
Could you explain what women are again? It seemed clear until you insisted that Jewish women were to be trusted when claiming they were raped and also were worth dying to defend.
I didn't insist anything. What I said was that it was interesting how the women's movement ditched the "believe women" cause when they actually had people with evidence.
Because MeToo was always just a way to acquire power through a coup of the entertainment industry and whatever other fields they could get into. That's all it ever was. It was never about "justice", it was about female power.
Believing Israel wouldn't give them any power, so they ditched it.
You stickied a post in your little fiefdom that said, "stand with Israel." Don't try to water your stance down now.
When did Nikki Haley, Libs of Tik Tok, and Ron DeSantis drop support for Israel?
You should see my X account.
I'm not trying to water down anything. Standing with Israel against Hamas doesn't mean I magically believe every Jewish woman is good, or even any.
Literally electoral suicide. And isn't the TERF propagandist an Orthodox Jewish woman?
You said women ditched Israel because it wouldn't help their conspiracy to get power. I'm pointing out that makes no sense by listing three turbo Zionists who you label as women's shills, two of which are women themselves.
But you do. You must. Supporting Jewish nationalism as you do makes no sense if you don't. As I've previously pointed out, you've spared Jewish women the usual accusations of being traitors to their men. You are very aggressive in pushing the opposite perception of gentile, especially White, women.
If someone even breathes in the direction of suggesting that White men and women have a shared interest in opposing mass immigration, you will have a reply posted in a millisecond accusing White women of being traitors and our enemy. You don't do that to Jews.
It's as if you want Whites divided but not Jews. I find that very interesting.
It's almost like to take over the right, you have to align some of your policies with what they want?
I just support them against the terrorists. I'm not going to move to Israel. (I don't think non-Jews even can)
Women : "Look, the black people are taking your jobs"
Also women : https://archive.is/UW6KX
They're lying to you. I can't decide if you know and you're pretending not to, or if you don't.
Sounds like he isn't right about anything, as he is still trying to play the "we can be EQUALS!" game by letting them have opinions and falling for their "I just care soooooo much about men's plights, I'm not like other girls."
Does he also think Karen Straughan is a brilliant leader for men? That's all I need to complete the set.
Feminists tend to run censorship divisions at corporations. Women love censorship. Absolutely love it. Women don't like free speech.
It might not be X and Musk doing things but some of the drones that work at X. I'd try to appeal and make a big deal about it.
However, Musk is a huge simp. Huge. The level of simping that Musk does is off the charts. So Musk siding with feminists and hating on men is par for the course.
Judging by the google cache of the account it was pretty mild calling out bad or hypocritical behavior.
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Q--Df9PiW2sJ:https://twitter.com/JohnDavisJDLLM&hl=en&gl=us
Shame on the WEF minion that Elon made CEO. And shame on Elon as well.
I might remake this post with that link.
I was struggling to find archives.
I've only just woken up and this thread is already enough retardedness for the day. I'm going back to cleaning up the vomit my dog decided to wake me up with.