I love feminist propaganda articles like this because if it turns even one woman away from marriage then it will have done more to prevent divorce rape than the MRAs have in 50 years.
Gen Xers and millennials started their relationships using big words like “equal partnership” and “co-parenting”. The men we married promised they were more emotionally mature than our fathers, more willing to change diapers and cooperate with our work schedules. Our understanding of commitment is markedly different from that of our parents, too; ethical non-monogamy and polyamory have become more common relationship structures, even within heterosexual marriages.
In other words women stopped having any enforceable responsibilities in marriage (like not cucking the guy who's paying her bills) and men lost access to the benefits in addition to having the responsibility of both sexes dumped on them.
I sheltered in place for years, just to emerge still stuck with a man who thinks “brown” is an acceptable bed sheet color? Please. I have a sense of propriety.
Remember, there's no reasonableness test that she has to satisfy before she shoves the family court baseball bat up your ass. Even a minor disagreement about bed sheet colors results in the most extreme punishments in family court.
And since Roe v Wade was overturned in 2022, rightwing loudmouths like Steven Crowder and Tim Pool and conservative politicians have set their sights on ending no-fault divorce. For them, “irreconcilable differences” isn’t a possible path out of a bad relationship, it’s an omen.
Of course it's an omen. It's only a way out of the relationship for the woman. The man is stuck in it for life, working himself into an early grave to pay her bills while the court system obeys every whim of someone who's bent on making his life a living hell. Nothing terrifies feminists more than the end of their family court scam.
In their pitiful defense, Republicans should be worried: married men are healthier, live longer, have lower risks for depression, and are more likely to have better cognitive function as they get older than unmarried men.
If these con artists hated marriage as much as they claim to they wouldn't keep peddling this dishonest study. As I've said a million times, the study lumps divorced men in with never married men. Ex wives make divorced men so miserable that they bring down the average of unmarried men. If marriage was as bad for women as they make it out to be they wouldn't be constantly complaining about the lack of available chumps to scam.
I sheltered in place for years, just to emerge still stuck with a man who thinks “brown” is an acceptable bed sheet color? Please. I have a sense of propriety.
So close... Maybe that means that men and women are different, and that deciding the "bed sheet colour" is something best left for women? What does it matter if your husband sucks at choosing the bed sheet colour, when you are there to 'correctly' choose the bed sheets for your family?
Shudder. Couldn't be. Dividing labour in marriage and society is according to what each sex does best is anti-feminist.
It IS a tool of patriarchy and that's why it's A GOOD THING! Women as a majority need a strong men in body, mind or both that can take charge in some way and that they can depend on.
We see the destructive effect that happens when this isn't available, obsessing on self-destructive traits and easily swayed by ideological dead ends.
It IS a tool of patriarchy and that's why it's A GOOD THING!
The original version of marriage was. Marriage has become so bastardized over the last 60 years that the only thing it shares with the original version is the name.
That is also true, linked with it being less patriarchaland technology reducing the need for someone to be at home minding it.
That latter wouldn't be as much an issue if women had the similar mentality of earlier centuries where they'd have a side business at home that could feed into the family pot but even that's being corrupted thanks to feminism since instead of creative businesses like selling clothing, food etc (which would be REALLY effective in having small online business today) they'd promote onlyfans as a way to 'support yourself'
"I can't stay married, but it can't be my fault because nothing can be my fault, so it's Marriage, that thing that's powered humanity for Millenia, that's the problem." The final sentence in the article sums up almost all the problems of modern feminism, no one can tell a woman something that would make her feel bad, so instead, women support poor, bad, and destructive behavior.
Feel good in the moment rather than help people have long-term happiness.
I'd add that modern marriage shares nothing but its name with its traditional predecessor. That's the part people leave out when they invoke Christianity to try to shame men into sticking their dicks in that feminist electrical outlet.
I love how feminists still to this day continue to ignore and wave away the benefits that women have with the sheer option of being able to marry without having to bother building up their own career or income, and letting the man carry the majority of the bills. If anything, they only try to re-frame this as a net negative.
And now on top of that women are given a free hand with easy career priorities over men without having to bust their ass one iota. Which of course is when some women go Pikachu face, shocked that suddenly they have trouble finding successful unmarried men with solid incomes.
I love feminist propaganda articles like this because if it turns even one woman away from marriage then it will have done more to prevent divorce rape than the MRAs have in 50 years.
In other words women stopped having any enforceable responsibilities in marriage (like not cucking the guy who's paying her bills) and men lost access to the benefits in addition to having the responsibility of both sexes dumped on them.
Remember, there's no reasonableness test that she has to satisfy before she shoves the family court baseball bat up your ass. Even a minor disagreement about bed sheet colors results in the most extreme punishments in family court.
Of course it's an omen. It's only a way out of the relationship for the woman. The man is stuck in it for life, working himself into an early grave to pay her bills while the court system obeys every whim of someone who's bent on making his life a living hell. Nothing terrifies feminists more than the end of their family court scam.
If these con artists hated marriage as much as they claim to they wouldn't keep peddling this dishonest study. As I've said a million times, the study lumps divorced men in with never married men. Ex wives make divorced men so miserable that they bring down the average of unmarried men. If marriage was as bad for women as they make it out to be they wouldn't be constantly complaining about the lack of available chumps to scam.
AAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Basically anyone that doesn't agree with their radical feminist agenda
So close... Maybe that means that men and women are different, and that deciding the "bed sheet colour" is something best left for women? What does it matter if your husband sucks at choosing the bed sheet colour, when you are there to 'correctly' choose the bed sheets for your family?
Shudder. Couldn't be. Dividing labour in marriage and society is according to what each sex does best is anti-feminist.
It IS a tool of patriarchy and that's why it's A GOOD THING! Women as a majority need a strong men in body, mind or both that can take charge in some way and that they can depend on.
We see the destructive effect that happens when this isn't available, obsessing on self-destructive traits and easily swayed by ideological dead ends.
The original version of marriage was. Marriage has become so bastardized over the last 60 years that the only thing it shares with the original version is the name.
That is also true, linked with it being less patriarchaland technology reducing the need for someone to be at home minding it.
That latter wouldn't be as much an issue if women had the similar mentality of earlier centuries where they'd have a side business at home that could feed into the family pot but even that's being corrupted thanks to feminism since instead of creative businesses like selling clothing, food etc (which would be REALLY effective in having small online business today) they'd promote onlyfans as a way to 'support yourself'
Marriage in the past was a good thing and a tool of the patriarchy. Marriage today is a tool of the gynocracy and a bad thing.
"I can't stay married, but it can't be my fault because nothing can be my fault, so it's Marriage, that thing that's powered humanity for Millenia, that's the problem." The final sentence in the article sums up almost all the problems of modern feminism, no one can tell a woman something that would make her feel bad, so instead, women support poor, bad, and destructive behavior. Feel good in the moment rather than help people have long-term happiness.
I'd add that modern marriage shares nothing but its name with its traditional predecessor. That's the part people leave out when they invoke Christianity to try to shame men into sticking their dicks in that feminist electrical outlet.
I love how feminists still to this day continue to ignore and wave away the benefits that women have with the sheer option of being able to marry without having to bother building up their own career or income, and letting the man carry the majority of the bills. If anything, they only try to re-frame this as a net negative.
And now on top of that women are given a free hand with easy career priorities over men without having to bust their ass one iota. Which of course is when some women go Pikachu face, shocked that suddenly they have trouble finding successful unmarried men with solid incomes.
These ppl need to die alone