Being hit in the head would be more accurate
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (32)
sorted by:
"After hitting head" suggests that the "man" fell down, "hitting [his] head." It appears to be passive voice because the headline does not name an actor, like "Jagoff leftist shoves old man, who hits head on pavement." Need to read the item to make sense of it.
I don't think the headline has passive voice. The tweet uses passive voice. I understand passive voice to simply be when the subject performing the verb is placed after the verb. If A hits B, passive voice would phrase it 'B was hit by A.'
Yes, passive voice is contextless grammatical structure. But writing "passively" is a value judgment on a piece of writing.
NBC article in question
https://archive.ph/Y67MT
Does anyone have video of the incident?
Last I heard no one knows waht happened. So this is bluster.
so .. "EndWokeness" is kiked, huh?
figures
Lol so it wasn't a banana peel then?
Actually, that would still be blunt force injury, just not a homicide.
This is why I'm critical of those being pissy about Israel/Jews - they're in bed with a lot of the MSM and leftists in general, which raises all sorts of red flags.
MSNBC regularly platforms Jonathan Greenblatt to kvetch like this.
This is why I'm critical of those Zionists. They're in bed with a lot of the MSM, the ADL, the Biden administration, and leftists in general, which raises all sorts of red flags.
Name one respected MSM figure being “pissy” about “jews”
Have you not seen the constant Palestine dick sucking going on? Besides, I didn't say "respected MSM figures" are pissy, I said "a lot of the MSM"
There's a difference.
By any members of the mainstream media? No, none. Why don’t you give an example like I asked if they’re so common? Nothing but mohel foreskin chomping, no Palestinian dick sucking strangely enough
Mehdi Hassan is a really obvious one.
Literally one of 5 muslims in “mainstream media”, and what’s the worst thing he’s said?
>”we shouldn’t ethnically cleanse palestine”
?
Now do all the “anti idpol rightoids” who have discovered their deep love of identity politics (for jews)
Yeah, I'm sure a member of one of the tribes of desert people that have been warring with each other for thousands of years is just making a principled, high-minded stand against ethnic cleansing. He's reposting apologia for anti-Jewish graffiti on X right now.
I don't want to imply I care that much about the graffiti - I don't. But it is beyond obvious that both participants in this Oppression Olympics race would like each other to leave whatever country they currently reside in.
Yet only one of the two groups has the capability to actually achieve their goals. Strangely enough, that’s the group we’ve been sending 10s of billions of dollars to every year for the past 7 decades. Doubly strange, it’s also the group who ran a child molestation blackmail ring against the West.
Weird.
But muh mean graffiti!
Spend five minutes on any website or forum that actually trusts the MSM, like r/news, and you'll see it. I'm not saying it's an all encompassing thing, but it's so incredibly common that saying it's not a thing is simply willful ignorance.
What’s been more prevalent, and what is least expected:
Muslims standing up for Muslims who are being ethnically cleansed
Right wing, Anti-idpol “whites” adopting idpol only when it comes to jews and their “right” to genocide the towelheads?
Do you mean a place like the Destiny subreddit? It's not exactly a Hamas rally.
He's part of the hamas dick rider club, so don't expect him to be intellectually honest about the issue.
Hey mohel!
I'm still not a jew, and you're still a raging faggot.
You’re a clown, that much is certain
I'm noticing that now.
There’s a lot of {noticing} going around these days