Something about to know who rules over you
(media.communities.win)
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Damn she went hard lol
A lot of people are noticing it and I'm glad to see it happening. Even a month ago, there was a lot of time to reflect and actually call out the elites, basically reverse their process instead they kept choosing to deflect, shift the blame and gaslight the public as if they have nothing to do with propping up troon trend, communism and far left activism. This may be petty of me but I hope they taste what it feels like to be pariah for long time, also this might be my guess, a lot of them played the part in vilifying anti-vaxxers that makes it a long schadenfreude for me.
Either she had a backup plan if she gets fired or she is quite stupid and naiv posting something like that with the real name attached.
barely any of us have backup plans, they've tried to make sure of it, and they're counting on us knowing that and stopping ourselves from doing anything.
when our backs are truly against the wall and we don't even have the main plan, that's when we'll end this dreadful era of history.
Well then better do some networking before that happens. Once you are on the street and homeless, you will not be able to do much to hurt the people responsible.
is just me who made an account with my boss persona, said the normal things for six months then suddenly turned the account based.
You posted this already
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/17rT6m2p1s/the-first-german-ive-seen-in-mod/c/
This is an update on how she got fired
True, this is the first time someone has been fired for comments on social media.
It's gotta be really weird for intellectually honest right-wing Zionists, assuming they exist. Imagine a big part of your politics being anti-cancel culture, and then all of a sudden people get cancelled for disagreeing with you. It seems like it should get some braincells activated, again assuming there are any.
Not really, a lot of people who are right-wing zionists oppose the cancellation of critics of Israel.
The right wing didn't mind cancel culture 30 years ago. Back then it was "stay in the closet or else".
If there weren't incidents of right wingers shunning people they dont' like they wouldn't be right wingers. It's not hypocrisy though. They just have standards. I know that can be hard to deal with for someone who approaches all actions as essentially equal in value.
Cancel culture is bad because it punishes people for being right. Punishing people for being wrong is another thing entirely.
Left wingers insist nazis are wrong and that is why they think it is just to cancel nazis. (Curiously "nazi" is just whatever the left doesn't like.) They insist that nazi ideas are dangerously infectious, which is why they need to be deplatformed rather than dissected and refuted.
Which was done for the moral fiber of making and keeping society cohesive.
We can see now that faggots are out of the closet and protected by the establishment, society has completely fallen off a cliff, and the standards and principles associated with every tertiary social branch and activity related to those principles have been negatively impacted as well.
It's almost like the sexual revolution, and all of its hierarchical parts that it entails (i.e., homosexuality) would lead to societal ruin... who'd a thunk it? Oh, that's right... the people who knew that it was a slippery slope once you stop keeping it "in the closet or else".
I see no evidence that she is a whore.
Yes you do. Another critic of your homeland is getting censored.
As long as we live in a world where it's perfectly ok to overtly shit on white people in any medium you'd like and blame them for all of the world's problems with no repercussions whatsoever (and in many cases benefits), fuck anyone who complains about the same thing being applied to any other group.
Noted that you couldn't address the substance.
I guess you're not very good at comprehending arguments then. Because people have been fired for comments about any number of people, I guess they're all "ruling" over us.
Are they collectively 'ruling over us'? That actually is closer to the truth, if it weren't for the fact that you can use the most bigoted invective against any of those who are not on the left.
No, it isn't. But that isn't the the point. The point isn't that she got cancelled; it's what she got cancelled for.
Van Jones goes on CNN and talks about the virus white people have in their head that makes us racist and untrustworthy: Freedom of speech, bruh.
Bree Larson says in a video interview that she is sick of having to walk into rooms and see white men's faces: Well, her heart was in the right place.
Pseudo-academics with degrees in subjects that revolve exclusively around the study and verification of what a burden it is to have to coexist with white people write bestselling books called White Fragility and The Problem With Whiteness: Academics must be allowed to freely debate.
The people pointing to this woman being fired are not pointing to it and saying "Look, for the first time ever someone got cancelled." they are saying "Look at what happens when you denigrate Jewish people - see how differently it works."
I find it difficult to believe that you didn't realize that going in.
Yes, I'm aware that in American society, the only people you can bash with impunity are whites, men, non-deviant people, and Christians.
Well, yeah. Same as if you denigrate blacks. Or Asians - though ruining their futures is permissible. Or women. Or troons. So this is not exactly unique to Jews. In fact, you need not even denigrate those groups, just saying something that extremist activists don't like is sufficient.
Would it seem to you that you are allowed more free speech about blacks than about Jews? It does not seem that way to me. People have been 'canceled' for far less than these comments you see here.
My criticism is directed not at "Jews are treated differently from whites", which is true enough in some cases, but at the title - because given the number of groups that are immune from any criticism, it would mean that a lot of groups - not just da Jooz - are ruling over you.
Ah, I misunderstood your point. It seemed to me to be the same kind of out-of-hand dismissal of pattern recognition that has become so common.
If what you were opposing was talking about jewish people the way liberals talk about white people, then we agree, apologies.
I do believe that, but that wasn't my point in these comments, I meant that Jews are hardly the only people who fall under this criticism ban. In fact, some other people much get greater protection.
None needed, I actually appreciate intelligent criticism and counter-arguments.
Yup, only Jews get others fired for legally protected speech.
Is there a Jew under your bed right now?
I don't spend time thinking about Jews of my own accord, and think it's rather hilarious that very online right Americans do.
No Jew is bothering me. On the other hand, plenty of Muslims are.
You should enlist in the idf i hear they have a plan for the muslims
Only if they are Democrats. Certainly not if you criticize Sheldon Adelson, or any Republican Jew.
No, because they're actually a menace.
Or we could go back to the old rules of the internet of not using your real name anywhere because it's fucking retarded to do so.
Some people need the attention.
Those are people who do not belong on the internet to begin with. They're too stupid.
Agreed.