Women throwing their boyfriends under the bus at trial to get a lighter sentence, a defense as old as court itself.
It'll never change, and is a huge factor into why women never come up nearly as much on lists of major crimes like serial killers or frauds. They get sweet deals to sell out their men to guarantee his conviction.
Loads of psychotic insanity in those quotes. I think this had to be one of the more bizarre lines:
In her list of likes, Ellison claims she prefers men with “sufficient strength to overpower you.” She also likes the men who control “most major world governments.”
I think both parts are the same issue: it's not unusual for women to be attracted to physically strong men, and it's not unusual for women to be attracted to rich and influential men. The idea that a woman in her position—with her dating pool of rich, influential finance figures—might like to see herself as being as high enough up on the chain as to be fucking around with "the men who control 'most major world governments'" isn't entirely surprising to me.
What is unusual is for anyone to phrase it as bluntly as she has. The other part is that most women (and you can explain this cynically or optimistically) aren't so openly mercenary as to leave their long-term partner the second a marginally better option comes along. From everything I've heard about this woman, I suspect that she is. Which may be connected to how nakedly she phrases her "type" as a calculus of strength and influence.
Indeed, and that's more or less what I was thinking in the back of my mind, given what we know about the circles she was in. The bluntness is definitely what makes it so odd and surprising though.
Yeah, lol. Probably very few women want to be the dominant one and even the ones who say they want to dominate actually really want to be dominated back.
what in the world is bizarre about it? That is women's basic sexual instinct just said out loud. Those are two things that every woman wants, on a deep instinctual level, from any serious mate. 1) much stronger than her 2) rules other men
NON-TRADITIONAL: “None of this non-hierarchical bulls***; everyone should have a ranking of their partners, people should know where they fall on the ranking, and there should be vicious power struggles for the higher ranks.”
If you want a good laugh, here's her courtroom sketch: https://media.patriots.win/post/EPRj4s4amhUi.png
Courtroom sketch, or reinterpretation of The Scream?
Accurate, either way.
The Skank, 2023
Colored pencils and pastels on paper
Woman points the finger at everyone but herself and bemoans her victimization
Imagine being a billionaire and thats who you decide to shack up with
Women throwing their boyfriends under the bus at trial to get a lighter sentence, a defense as old as court itself.
It'll never change, and is a huge factor into why women never come up nearly as much on lists of major crimes like serial killers or frauds. They get sweet deals to sell out their men to guarantee his conviction.
Loads of psychotic insanity in those quotes. I think this had to be one of the more bizarre lines:
"My kink is world domination" sounds like something a localizer would make up in a bad JRPG translation, but she's totally serious.
Isn't that just most men, for most women? Unless the "you" is specific, which would be weird and kind of funny.
Dunno, have you seen a lot of these ultra low T zoomer guys? Bet she could chew through their sticks-for-arms with her beaver teeth with ease.
Yes, that part was pretty typical, it's the 2nd half that I bolded which was rather weird.
I think both parts are the same issue: it's not unusual for women to be attracted to physically strong men, and it's not unusual for women to be attracted to rich and influential men. The idea that a woman in her position—with her dating pool of rich, influential finance figures—might like to see herself as being as high enough up on the chain as to be fucking around with "the men who control 'most major world governments'" isn't entirely surprising to me.
What is unusual is for anyone to phrase it as bluntly as she has. The other part is that most women (and you can explain this cynically or optimistically) aren't so openly mercenary as to leave their long-term partner the second a marginally better option comes along. From everything I've heard about this woman, I suspect that she is. Which may be connected to how nakedly she phrases her "type" as a calculus of strength and influence.
Indeed, and that's more or less what I was thinking in the back of my mind, given what we know about the circles she was in. The bluntness is definitely what makes it so odd and surprising though.
Yeah, lol. Probably very few women want to be the dominant one and even the ones who say they want to dominate actually really want to be dominated back.
This slayed me. I wasn't ready to read this last line lmao.
what in the world is bizarre about it? That is women's basic sexual instinct just said out loud. Those are two things that every woman wants, on a deep instinctual level, from any serious mate. 1) much stronger than her 2) rules other men
Something about reason and accountability.
Girls get it done.
They need no man.
etc.
https://preview.redd.it/pinning-the-weasel-v0-aglngeiavjz91.png?auto=webp&s=fc423918cd867b63ab808b435943f1bcfd5a487a
What a terrible day to have eyes.
Dude, just no. haha
That's one way to describe a game of Pin the Tail on the Donkey.
NON-TRADITIONAL: “None of this non-hierarchical bulls***; everyone should have a ranking of their partners, people should know where they fall on the ranking, and there should be vicious power struggles for the higher ranks.”