The Great Replacement in the Northeast
(whitepapersinstitute.substack.com)
Comments (27)
sorted by:
The fact that these people are coming from all over the world tells you how deliberate this all is. These aren't random poor people wandering across the border. They are being recruited and shipped here by NGOs.
Silly me, I forgot all about the delicious mud cookies.
The mosquito burgers are quite good as well. Great gaymer fuel for when I'm watching my wife taking a load of diversity on her face.
Do they still celebrate Thanksgiving or Christmas or are they downplayed. Thankfully my company still does a huge Christmas party but I’m sure all it takes is for one person to whine to ruin that
Not OP but my company sends out "Happy Diwali" emails each year, but never Merry Christmas or Happy Easter emails. And management specifically instructs us to only say "Happy Holidays" to our clients.
My company mentions all those other holidays like Kwanza and Diwali but they still say Christmas. Hopefully that won’t change at least
It's certainly happening here in Canada. I rarely see any white people working in stores anymore.
DEI did that. It also artificially keeps wages down.
Deport now or fight later. Those are the choices.
I don't think we'll ever deport. The sense of fairness is too ingrained in the culture.
Stop thinking within the enemy framework. The very concept of "native" is subversive because it implies that there is a group that belongs there as compared to a non-native group that doesn't. It is another gay commie synonym for "good" to create a contrast against Whites who are always the "non-native". You never hear corporate media refer to Europeans as native, or Palestinians for that matter.
The indians aren't "native" because migrations, invasions, conquests, and genocides have been the norm since the dawn of life, and particularly by hominid species. The indians were conquered and should be praising whatever heathen gods they worship that it happened in a more modern time. Because that meant they weren't immediately wiped out with their children taken as slaves and had their women taken as prizes as was the norm throughout human history.
The argument isn't that replacement is bad. It is that replacing WHITE people is bad. Some brainwashed Whites disagree, as do the vast majority of ignorant non-Whites who can't comprehend how they are so much better off under White rule.
Very, very true. Which should be - but sadly largely isn't - a huge wakeup call for whites. Whites are evil, whether they're "colonizers" or actually native. Whites don't get a homeland, and in fact must be actively replaced in any white-majority locations, regardless of their status. As they saying goes, they want us dead.
I mean, it's both. Replacement isn't inherently bad, but it's certainly bad - and should be fought against - in the eyes of the group being replaced. Everyone has a right to self defense. Replacement was absolutely bad from the perspective of the native tribes, when it was happening to them. But that doesn't invalidate that it's also bad from the white perspective, when it's happening to us. Also, it's currently happening to us, and in a very systematic and deliberate way, so talk of white replacement holds more validity than things that happened in the past, that can't be changed.
Self-hating whites really piss me off. They've just bought into so much propaganda, and don't even realize it. It's also funny how they're some of the most racist people, but their own self-image has them as the only people with "empathy." Fucking morons.
Sure and, from their perspective, that was absolutely bad too. If anything, that just makes the argument stronger.
It's not (technically) too late to stop what happened to the natives from happening to Hwites. So the discussion should be had.
It also doesn't even need to be argued along racial lines at all. While I think we do need to have a discussion specifically about white people, we also absolutely need to have a discussion about immigration, regardless of the races involved. Both are problems, interlinked though they may sometimes be, that need solutions.
It's not (just) about replacing whites. It's about replacing Americans. Stop importing so many "refugees" and "asylum seekers," lets even discuss regular legal immigration (massive reduction ideally, and more focus on quality of those we do let in), and let's certainly shut down open borders-style illegal immigration. Immigration is broken, we need to address that, no matter how anyone feels about white people.
The dirt isn’t magic.
We know. Nobody said it was. Put it down and stop eating it.
I'd go further than that. It's about replacing everyone. If everyone is on thier toes and a moment away from Civil War, then you need party bosses all the time to smooth things over. The Left want us to look like Lebanon.
Immigration is not a zero sum game, when managed, it can shore up deficiencies and be helpful. But resources, be they housing, employment, anything on the hierarchy of needs, are finite. Unmanaged, unmitigated immigration does eventually create a zero sum game where the added population's gains in the hierarchy of needs are taking away from the original population's needs being met, reducing and harming them, directly. With neither groups needs being covered. We are not managing immigration and certainly some are already deprived and harmed as a result.
We would do better to invest in building up these third worlds like was done for South America, which provided jobs for people there, and wealth & resources for us here. Hopefully without the corruption and other problems happening again.
I would respect it if it was a conquest by a superior nation. This is just assisted suicide, is pathetic.
I don't agree with Techumseh, but I also don't disagree with Andrew Jackson.
We could always have found an amicable mean (like what Tyler was trying to do), but the US government was funded by land sales instead of taxes, so redistributing Indian land was very profitable.