So im sure by now people have noticed that sjws dont care about actual pedos, they completely ignore actual pedos, but they have an irrational hatred over short fictional anime characters, to the point where they are now basically just doing the "anything short is pedo" and Amazon is completely removing the "short body type" in Blue Protocal. Yeah they just erased short characters completely.
Calling it "pedo" is just a cover for the real grievances they have, the real reason for the irrational hatred of petite female characters and anime and Japanese games in general, and it is the same reason they removed jiggle physics from the game. They think it caters to "the male fantasy". But they cant say this is the reason ,so they just say that its "pedo bait"
More like enable themselves. The number of times we have to "reset the clock" on anti-loli/anime activists, it should be basic operating procedure to investigate them for noncery.
Are we really doing the "everyone who doesn't like drawn kiddie porn is a pedophile" routine again? I thought this shit died when the resident patron saint of loli had a huge meltdown and threatened to kill everyone who correctly identify drawn CP as completely degenerate.
You think loli hentai should be banned because somebody might hurt the pixels' feelings; I think it should be banned because it's porn. We are not the same.
i think the same way in that i understand people who hate porn in general, but i dont agree with people who treat pixels like they are real
Based...but doesn't that make you an "anti-loli activist" ?
there's a difference between being anti porn and being an anti loli activist. An anti loli activist is weirdly hyper focused on just loli and not porn, whilst i understand the anti porn people, i do not agree with the anti loli people on the grounds of the fact that i dont agree with the way they treat pixels like they are real
c/Cetra pretty much made my point for me, but I'd just like to add: Loli is only a character archetype- might as well say "ban MILFs!" or some other category. That's why I was specific in my wording.
The anti-loli activists often decry even the depiction (non-sexual) of short, underdeveloped characters despite clearly being adults in thought and action. They are also from the same crowd who call sexy characters "unrealistic" despite there being millions of real-world examples with even better curves and bigger tits.
"activists" != "everyone". Not difficult to understand unless you're just wanting to display some performative righteous outrage.
This convo always goes this way. It starts with "anti-loli activists" and after a bit of back-and-forth, it becomes apparent that it means anyone who isn't a drawn CP endorser.
Yup.
It’s the “you must secretly want to fuck spiders” cartoon in action.
Apparently the only people who oppose child pornography are the ones who enthusiastically endorse illustrations of child pornography.
I saw some people discuss this phenomenon elsewhere earlier today, and someone raised an interesting point: There are people who are into really weird shit - feeders, fart fetishists, dudes who get turned on by women in stilletto heels stepping on pedals... but none of them keep sperging about how "THIS IS TOTALLY FINE AND NOT AT ALL SUSPICIOUS" in polite company. Only lolifags (and furries, but there's a siginificant overlap) do this.
I think I missed that. Which sperg did that
Ableist