Amazon bans Scott Adams 'for life' ahead of new book launch
(thepostmillennial.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
Because Scott Adams broke one of the foundational sins of the globalist world order: racism. Matt Walsh didn't. Weirdly, even though Walsh believes in differences among the sexes, which is almost always attributed to genetic differences, this doesn't pass over to believing in racial differences due to genetic variance, at least in normie territory for politics. However, Walsh is clearly protected, given who he works for.
There are two other subjects which form the trifecta of globalist sin, discussion of anything bad about jews, and anything contrary to the official history of WW2. White nationalism could be another topic, but if someone holds a view contrary to the globalists on the above 3 topics, they're usually an ethno nationalist at the minimum, anyway. Whatever your position on these subjects, every captured, corrupt, false choice, globalist subversive, and ineffectual normie, left or right, believes the mainstream position on these topics, and as such, they're increasingly becoming the best way to identify people you can trust and those you can't.
Of course it's never that simple, as there will always be outliers, but as the world slides into insanity, the dividing lines and identifiers will become increasingly apparent.
It also majorly comes down to the impact they could have. Matt Walsh isn't going to change many minds of anyone who wasn't already a Matt Walsh fan.
Adams has multi decade popularity and a comic strip that is basically a cornerstone of American culture. He will absolutely reach people outside his random little circles of dedicated followers just by accident. Which means he has considerable more possible impact, and needs to be corralled.
Eh, maybe. If Matt Walsh wasn't controlled opposition, and came out with something that promoted racial differences, or in the extreme case started speaking badly about jews, I absolutely think he'd be censored. Talk about those topics results in censorship of big and small folk.
Of course, everything is just a factor in these decisions. But often times these guys are left to do whatever they want, until they leave their little circles and start reaching people outside them.
Matt Walsh has endorsed Adam's position multiple times. It's because he works for DW and DW has back room deals with big tech
It's because Matt Walsh works for dw/Shapiro pushing the mainstream agenda.
Scott Adams coming up with the conclusion of white self defense on his own is not ok. Whites aren't supposed to speak unless they are shabbos.
He didn't break the foundational sin of racism. He just looked like he did out of context.
He actually wasn't saying that white people should stay away from black people; he was saying that if the poll (he felt wasn't true) was accurate, then any help from whites wasn't appreciated and white should stop helping.
Even hinting at the above 3 globalist foundational sins (at least with how it's enforced on us plebs) is an infraction worthy of unpersoning in the new world order.
To be clear: Who Matt Walsh works for is the Jews. There's really no other way to put it in this case.
This bizarre supposed Catholic is somehow advancing their cause. I don't trust him for a second.
Throw vaccines in there as well potentially.
Walsh has definitely explicitly called out misbehavior from other racial groups which is racism according to the left