women and girls the world over are suffering due to the actions of men
Wasn't your predecessor ousted because she protected men who dressed in drag and engaged in these actions? Your side is the problem here you stupid sand nigger.
every single man can, and should, play his role in making change
When the feminists put as much effort into rooting out the dehumanization of men and boys in their movement as they do purging the TERFs, then we can talk. Until then I'll give women's issues the same priority that feminists give men's issues: Negative infinity.
Whether in politics, in the office, on the worksite, in school, the pub or our own living rooms, we can all do more as men to challenge problematic behaviour among our friends, colleagues and family members.
Being a toxic asshole that no one wants to be around isn't behavior worth emulating. This is proof that feminists aren't against toxicity, they just want to replace it with their own toxicity.
Frankly, there is not a grown man in the country today who has not been guilty of problematic behaviour, actions or words towards women in some form. I am no different. Like all men, I have had to reflect on my own behaviour and language over the years.
So you have skeletons in your closet and you assume that every other man must as well. I get that your tiny little mind will never comprehend this, but just because you're a sex pest and a pedophile doesn't mean that all men are like you.
women and girls the world over are suffering due to the actions of men
No. They are suffering due to the actions, and inactions, and lies, and weakness, of politicians. 90% of their REAL problems comes back to that. And men are suffering just as much, if not more.
Men are actually more likely to be victims of violent crime than women, it's just that we care about women hugely more than men, and women are more likely to live in fear, whether that fear is justified or not.
All of this is about 'feeling' safe rather than statistically being safe. I'm also sure that women who constantly listen to crime podcasts and read crime fiction novels will also feel more unsafe than they actually are.
One of the realisations I had is that the majority of people privately oppose equality of the sexes while saying they support it in public because of social desirability bias. It's spoken in hushed tones by the public but they would sacrifice virtually all the men to keep a single woman safe (see conscription).
As if all of us were lucky enough to not live in a city without any blacks in it. Because we absolutely live with that fear every day, and if I hear the words "white boy" I knew from age 8 to just start running without looking back.
Yeah it's total bullshit. I've lived downtown in a major city, and every time I was out walking around I used caution. I was always scanning my surroundings, and at night I'd avoid alleys.
I wasn't terrified, but I was always on alert.
The notion that men can go anywhere without a care in the world is feminist propaganda.
Dude, Humza Yousaf shouldn't be in any position of power, considering his loathsome personality and shifty reputation. Then there is 'Anas Sawar', the leader of the Labour party. Explain to me how two Pakistani Muslims reached such positions of political power, whereas the population is 96% white and only 2,7% 'Asian'.
I like how their concern isn't that Tate is a massive grifter that got rich scamming young men with his stable of camwhores. It's not that he's selling a surface level interpretation of masculinity to the same young men he ripped off while making pedestrian observations. It's "muh soggy knee".
I like how their concern isn't that Tate is a massive grifter that got rich scamming young men with his stable of camwhores.
The only reason they give a shit about that at all is because a man made money off it. Remove Tate from the picture and you get every ethot in existence. It's the same scam but they get called stunning and brave instead. IMO his $50/month "Hustler's University" is the bigger problem.
Wasn't your predecessor ousted because she protected men who dressed in drag and engaged in these actions? Your side is the problem here you stupid sand nigger.
When the feminists put as much effort into rooting out the dehumanization of men and boys in their movement as they do purging the TERFs, then we can talk. Until then I'll give women's issues the same priority that feminists give men's issues: Negative infinity.
Being a toxic asshole that no one wants to be around isn't behavior worth emulating. This is proof that feminists aren't against toxicity, they just want to replace it with their own toxicity.
So you have skeletons in your closet and you assume that every other man must as well. I get that your tiny little mind will never comprehend this, but just because you're a sex pest and a pedophile doesn't mean that all men are like you.
Women and girls are miserable in a vacuum and like to complain in the same way that they like popping zits. They will make some shit up.
No amount of simping will make women happy.
Emasculating yourself will not make women happy.
"Problematic behavior" is a manufactured issue and a shit test.
As my uncle said once, "give a woman a bag of gold and she will complain about the weight."
M'lady! I have brought you the Sun and the Moon!
Where are the stars nigga?
No. They are suffering due to the actions, and inactions, and lies, and weakness, of politicians. 90% of their REAL problems comes back to that. And men are suffering just as much, if not more.
Maybe turn the gaze inward, Humzy.
A man who idolises a child rapist is trying to tar us all with the same brush.
Men are actually more likely to be victims of violent crime than women, it's just that we care about women hugely more than men, and women are more likely to live in fear, whether that fear is justified or not.
All of this is about 'feeling' safe rather than statistically being safe. I'm also sure that women who constantly listen to crime podcasts and read crime fiction novels will also feel more unsafe than they actually are.
Tbh, this was one of the few things the imp was more correct about. Women are much less rational (on average) than men.
Not that all men are rational, but fucks sake. Out of 10, I'd say 5 women are batshit, while only 2 or 3 men are.
One of the realisations I had is that the majority of people privately oppose equality of the sexes while saying they support it in public because of social desirability bias. It's spoken in hushed tones by the public but they would sacrifice virtually all the men to keep a single woman safe (see conscription).
I always love this argument.
As if all of us were lucky enough to not live in a city without any blacks in it. Because we absolutely live with that fear every day, and if I hear the words "white boy" I knew from age 8 to just start running without looking back.
Yeah it's total bullshit. I've lived downtown in a major city, and every time I was out walking around I used caution. I was always scanning my surroundings, and at night I'd avoid alleys.
I wasn't terrified, but I was always on alert.
The notion that men can go anywhere without a care in the world is feminist propaganda.
I always think that way. My major was heavily involved crime statistics and I'm a partt of two of the demographics criminals like killing the most
Is this the "there are too many white people in Scotland's government" clown?
Yes.
He appears to be one of the many muslim men who hate white people in scotland:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Kriss_Donald
The fact that this untrustworthy racist is first minister tells you everything you need to know about Scotland.
Dude, Humza Yousaf shouldn't be in any position of power, considering his loathsome personality and shifty reputation. Then there is 'Anas Sawar', the leader of the Labour party. Explain to me how two Pakistani Muslims reached such positions of political power, whereas the population is 96% white and only 2,7% 'Asian'.
Something seems off here.
Does the scot parliament get voted at the same time as the national?
Pajeet? He’s not really Indian 😂
He’s the fanatic who pushed for criticism of islam to be made illegal INSIDE your own home in Scotland…
His parents are Pakis, which was part of India until the 1940s with the only difference being religion.
A Muslim talking about a feminism makes as much sense as a Ku Klux Klan member talking about Black Lives Matter.
I like how their concern isn't that Tate is a massive grifter that got rich scamming young men with his stable of camwhores. It's not that he's selling a surface level interpretation of masculinity to the same young men he ripped off while making pedestrian observations. It's "muh soggy knee".
The only reason they give a shit about that at all is because a man made money off it. Remove Tate from the picture and you get every ethot in existence. It's the same scam but they get called stunning and brave instead. IMO his $50/month "Hustler's University" is the bigger problem.
He is posturing for his forthcoming anti-misogyny law that he promised in his campaign for first minister.
fuck off back to islamabad
The tradcucks are going to be worse than the feminists. It's coming.
They're two sides of the same anti-male coin for sure, but this pajeet is definitely on the feminist side.