Trustworthy or not, cumulative view counts of a recording online are not directly comparable to viewing numbers of a live broadcast event. Especially if you try to include those old events where the public were more of a captive audience.
People are absolutely correct that Tucker is dominating cable news, but going by raw view counts is misleading. You have to do some extrapolation.
Yeah, don't quote me on this as I'm not sure, but I thought Twitter's "view" was like two seconds. Not even sure the video needs to play, it could just be the tweet itself being on your monitor for two seconds.
It's amazing to me that one of the most famous people in the worst is a failed kickboxer turned con artist that acts like surface level observations are "hard truths".
It's interesting. It's mostly just Tate narrating on a litany of points with Tucker prompting him a couple times. Normally resulting in Tate mentioning that he would never kill himself.
He only put out his more palatable opinions, frankly.
I'd say it's worth a watch if you're interested in his issues or sex dynamics in society. Don't watch it just because you like Tucker, because he doesn't feature himself too much.
Do get normies to watch it though. They might need to at least be exposed to some different opinions.
There will never be anything that beats concurrent live viewership from the past. Now that we have so many choices and sources of entertainment, we consider 1m concurrent viewers to be a great success, when it used to get you cancelled.
I disagree with much of what he says, but that man also speaks some truth, which is one of the big reasons his words cut through the garbage the elite media puts out.
Speaking obvious truth so you can pretend to be a messiah and guru to line your pockets isn't respectable. Its what all evil men through history did.
Jim Jones created an entire fucking cult on saying "cops aren't your friend, no one cares about you, take care of yourself" to black guys. He spoke entirely the truth for much of his run.
Tate literally made his money abusing and manipulating the same men he tries to preach to now. He ran a fucking cam girl empire and bragged about destroying lonely men's lives.
Its always amazing how easily people will be duped into defending people who have made it open and clear will sell them out and backstab them the moment they aren't under siege.
He got deplatformed off the major platforms. If you ever had the misfortune of being around high school or junior high English departments, you would realize their hatred for Tate means he is doing something right.
He isn't a great role model, he doesn't give great advice, but having a guy who hasn't been castrated by society isn't the worst thing to have in the spotlight, even if he is used as the second option in a false dichotomy.
Pretty sure his dad is "ex" CIA. Which of course means that he does what is best for TPTB. If Tate was an actual threat to the global power structure, he'd be either dead or on the run. Dude is a degenerate hawk.
Allowing people to talk crap about someone doesn't mean that they weren't deplatformed. By your metric, Donald Trump wasn't deplatformed; both Trump and Tate were deplatformed.
I don't know why you are struggling with reading comprehension, "He isn't a great role model, he doesn't give great advice"; I don't endorse Tate. I've never seen a single video of his, never been on his site, and only saw clips of him after he got deplatformed. But I also have worked with teenagers for years -- talked with many thousands of teenagers -- and saw him have an impact that, while not great, was much better than those gobbling up the trans garbage mainstream entertainment is putting out.
As I am telling you, I always tell them I don't support his ideas. Still, him being around, as I said earlier, isn't a bad thing. He creates opportunities for discussions on subjects like masculinity, and can drive some to more positive figures.
Trustworthy or not, cumulative view counts of a recording online are not directly comparable to viewing numbers of a live broadcast event. Especially if you try to include those old events where the public were more of a captive audience.
People are absolutely correct that Tucker is dominating cable news, but going by raw view counts is misleading. You have to do some extrapolation.
This might be the view on the tweet, and not necessarily the video. Because tweets also have view counts.
I pretty sure you're thinking about Youtube.
Yeah, don't quote me on this as I'm not sure, but I thought Twitter's "view" was like two seconds. Not even sure the video needs to play, it could just be the tweet itself being on your monitor for two seconds.
The UK government desperately trying to block it despite vpns being a thing for years....
Don't know how accurate it is but there are more factors at work that would want to suppress it than popularise it so probably accurate.
That'd be like the whack a mole game they do with pirate sites, it's just a waste of resources.
It's amazing to me that one of the most famous people in the worst is a failed kickboxer turned con artist that acts like surface level observations are "hard truths".
I watched almost the entire interview.
It's interesting. It's mostly just Tate narrating on a litany of points with Tucker prompting him a couple times. Normally resulting in Tate mentioning that he would never kill himself.
He only put out his more palatable opinions, frankly.
I'd say it's worth a watch if you're interested in his issues or sex dynamics in society. Don't watch it just because you like Tucker, because he doesn't feature himself too much.
Do get normies to watch it though. They might need to at least be exposed to some different opinions.
There will never be anything that beats concurrent live viewership from the past. Now that we have so many choices and sources of entertainment, we consider 1m concurrent viewers to be a great success, when it used to get you cancelled.
I disagree with much of what he says, but that man also speaks some truth, which is one of the big reasons his words cut through the garbage the elite media puts out.
Speaking obvious truth so you can pretend to be a messiah and guru to line your pockets isn't respectable. Its what all evil men through history did.
Jim Jones created an entire fucking cult on saying "cops aren't your friend, no one cares about you, take care of yourself" to black guys. He spoke entirely the truth for much of his run.
Tate literally made his money abusing and manipulating the same men he tries to preach to now. He ran a fucking cam girl empire and bragged about destroying lonely men's lives.
Exactly, Tate is a fucktard and he hates the morons that look up to him
Its always amazing how easily people will be duped into defending people who have made it open and clear will sell them out and backstab them the moment they aren't under siege.
He's the Jordan Peterson of the redpill community except worse because he gives degenerate solutions to legitimate problems
He got deplatformed off the major platforms. If you ever had the misfortune of being around high school or junior high English departments, you would realize their hatred for Tate means he is doing something right.
He isn't a great role model, he doesn't give great advice, but having a guy who hasn't been castrated by society isn't the worst thing to have in the spotlight, even if he is used as the second option in a false dichotomy.
Pretty sure his dad is "ex" CIA. Which of course means that he does what is best for TPTB. If Tate was an actual threat to the global power structure, he'd be either dead or on the run. Dude is a degenerate hawk.
Allowing people to talk crap about someone doesn't mean that they weren't deplatformed. By your metric, Donald Trump wasn't deplatformed; both Trump and Tate were deplatformed.
I don't know why you are struggling with reading comprehension, "He isn't a great role model, he doesn't give great advice"; I don't endorse Tate. I've never seen a single video of his, never been on his site, and only saw clips of him after he got deplatformed. But I also have worked with teenagers for years -- talked with many thousands of teenagers -- and saw him have an impact that, while not great, was much better than those gobbling up the trans garbage mainstream entertainment is putting out.
As I am telling you, I always tell them I don't support his ideas. Still, him being around, as I said earlier, isn't a bad thing. He creates opportunities for discussions on subjects like masculinity, and can drive some to more positive figures.