Lol the host bitch is so stupid. She just states the opposite of reality and gets instantly dismantled.
What I like about RFK is that he's good at upending a dump truck of info to substantiate his opinions and keep the rhythm of the discussion constantly moving in his favour, just moving from one factual rebuttal to the next. Science cultists have no option but to sit there and get ironed flat or else go all out to interrupt him and look like a massive bitch, like the retarded Krystal Ball woman on Breaking Points. I'm starting to come around to the idea that his voice might actually be an advantage in all this. It forces his debaters to listen to him, and by the time they process how he just owned them he's moving on and fishing out another receipt.
I like how he doesn't let hosts get away with setting up an uneven arena either. "Blah blah blah muh science men disagree with your views, but anyway onto our questi-' 'I'm sorry, which views?'
"No pre-licensing placebo-controlled safety study."
I'm sure there's many vaccine studies of various qualities and the real problem is we're not doing enough testing in general. But if he said something subjective like "we're not doing enough testing" they'd say fact check: false, here's what we're doing it's "enough" according to "medical experts".
If they fact-check "no pre-licensing placebo-controlled safety study" they either have to "fact-check: true, but..." or just outright lie.
RFK: here are several examples of why you can't trust the agency's claiming these medical innovations are safe and effective. here's examples where they have not only been wrong, but knew that they were wrong and lied to the American public to push a product.
Cunt: but those organizations that you just pointed out our nefarious and dubious at best say that they are safe and effective, so they have to be! also your own kids say you are a liar so ha!
It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Mark Twain nailed it. The moderator kept conflating repeating information, believing it to be true and lying. She would not allow the idea that people acting in good faith could be duped by a supposedly authoritative source into doing massive harm.
REMEMBER WHEN YOU COUNTED THAT AS A COVID DEATH FOR TWO FUCKING YEARS YOU FUCKING FAGGOT?
Hey, uh, you ever correct those figures, by the way?
Lol the host bitch is so stupid. She just states the opposite of reality and gets instantly dismantled.
What I like about RFK is that he's good at upending a dump truck of info to substantiate his opinions and keep the rhythm of the discussion constantly moving in his favour, just moving from one factual rebuttal to the next. Science cultists have no option but to sit there and get ironed flat or else go all out to interrupt him and look like a massive bitch, like the retarded Krystal Ball woman on Breaking Points. I'm starting to come around to the idea that his voice might actually be an advantage in all this. It forces his debaters to listen to him, and by the time they process how he just owned them he's moving on and fishing out another receipt.
I like how he doesn't let hosts get away with setting up an uneven arena either. "Blah blah blah muh science men disagree with your views, but anyway onto our questi-' 'I'm sorry, which views?'
She was very Cathy Newman-esque:
RFK: points out top 4 vax makers were fined $35 Billion in last 10 yrs for things like bribing doctors to lie about their drugs
CUNT: "So you're saying all doctors are evil liars?"
So you're saying your King of The Lobers?
Bitch are you retarded?
He's also using clear, yes or no criteria.
"No pre-licensing placebo-controlled safety study."
I'm sure there's many vaccine studies of various qualities and the real problem is we're not doing enough testing in general. But if he said something subjective like "we're not doing enough testing" they'd say fact check: false, here's what we're doing it's "enough" according to "medical experts".
If they fact-check "no pre-licensing placebo-controlled safety study" they either have to "fact-check: true, but..." or just outright lie.
The dumb broad just reflexively lied about it because she doesn't understand what he's talking about
"How can we help you to come to the side of 'Science'?"
"Wha-wha-What was the question?... ha... How can you help me come to my senses?"
"No... No, no. You are a very smart person..."
He doesn't have to be smart to see through the most loaded question in human history you fucking retard.
RFK: here are several examples of why you can't trust the agency's claiming these medical innovations are safe and effective. here's examples where they have not only been wrong, but knew that they were wrong and lied to the American public to push a product.
Cunt: but those organizations that you just pointed out our nefarious and dubious at best say that they are safe and effective, so they have to be! also your own kids say you are a liar so ha!
It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Mark Twain nailed it. The moderator kept conflating repeating information, believing it to be true and lying. She would not allow the idea that people acting in good faith could be duped by a supposedly authoritative source into doing massive harm.
How did every far leftist on reddit suddenly become blindly obedient to any old crap produced by big pharma?
I would have thought the companies making billions and paying NOTHING for everyone they damage would get zero support.
But every reddit thread has blind support- did they really ban anyone who questioned it?
They were all spineless sheep that just follow whatever the current position of their party is.
War is bad, if Bush does it -> Dems do it: OMG, I stand with Ukraine.
Bombing the Middle East or SomeFuckingstand, bad, if Republicans do it -> Dems do it: OMG, bring democracy to Syria!
Vaccines are sus and cause autism -> Dems enforce them: OMG, if you don't get your 8 COVID shots you are a Nazi!
METOO! Trump is a rapist ("Grab them by the pussy") -> Hunter fucks underage prostitutes. Biden finger bangs Tara Reade. Crickets.
Science!! Are you on the side of science???
How can you be on the side of something that's completely blackboxed and you don't understand at all?
It might be easiest to convince people that they've never been fooled.
Easiest of all: they can't be fooled.
This guy is like a walking encyclopedia.
He knows all the minutiae and reports OFF THE TOP OF HIS HEAD.
How come leftists jumped into bed with big pharma corporations and forgot they paid $100bns of fines for fraud?
Because it's about power aquisition.
They'll jump into bed with anyone, do anything, and say anything, so long as it gets them more power.
BUT MUH SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS
scientists are not gods, they can be wrong
Where's Woptonio of Wogville Venice with rebuttal? Up his own arse probably the lame cunt
Wow... ending it with an attack on his family life. Classy.