Lol the host bitch is so stupid. She just states the opposite of reality and gets instantly dismantled.
What I like about RFK is that he's good at upending a dump truck of info to substantiate his opinions and keep the rhythm of the discussion constantly moving in his favour, just moving from one factual rebuttal to the next. Science cultists have no option but to sit there and get ironed flat or else go all out to interrupt him and look like a massive bitch, like the retarded Krystal Ball woman on Breaking Points. I'm starting to come around to the idea that his voice might actually be an advantage in all this. It forces his debaters to listen to him, and by the time they process how he just owned them he's moving on and fishing out another receipt.
I like how he doesn't let hosts get away with setting up an uneven arena either. "Blah blah blah muh science men disagree with your views, but anyway onto our questi-' 'I'm sorry, which views?'
"No pre-licensing placebo-controlled safety study."
I'm sure there's many vaccine studies of various qualities and the real problem is we're not doing enough testing in general. But if he said something subjective like "we're not doing enough testing" they'd say fact check: false, here's what we're doing it's "enough" according to "medical experts".
If they fact-check "no pre-licensing placebo-controlled safety study" they either have to "fact-check: true, but..." or just outright lie.
Lol the host bitch is so stupid. She just states the opposite of reality and gets instantly dismantled.
What I like about RFK is that he's good at upending a dump truck of info to substantiate his opinions and keep the rhythm of the discussion constantly moving in his favour, just moving from one factual rebuttal to the next. Science cultists have no option but to sit there and get ironed flat or else go all out to interrupt him and look like a massive bitch, like the retarded Krystal Ball woman on Breaking Points. I'm starting to come around to the idea that his voice might actually be an advantage in all this. It forces his debaters to listen to him, and by the time they process how he just owned them he's moving on and fishing out another receipt.
I like how he doesn't let hosts get away with setting up an uneven arena either. "Blah blah blah muh science men disagree with your views, but anyway onto our questi-' 'I'm sorry, which views?'
She was very Cathy Newman-esque:
RFK: points out top 4 vax makers were fined $35 Billion in last 10 yrs for things like bribing doctors to lie about their drugs
CUNT: "So you're saying all doctors are evil liars?"
So you're saying your King of The Lobers?
Bitch are you retarded?
He's also using clear, yes or no criteria.
"No pre-licensing placebo-controlled safety study."
I'm sure there's many vaccine studies of various qualities and the real problem is we're not doing enough testing in general. But if he said something subjective like "we're not doing enough testing" they'd say fact check: false, here's what we're doing it's "enough" according to "medical experts".
If they fact-check "no pre-licensing placebo-controlled safety study" they either have to "fact-check: true, but..." or just outright lie.
The dumb broad just reflexively lied about it because she doesn't understand what he's talking about