too little, too late, provided this PM isn't controlled opposition
Sweden has an Islamic minority and no-go zones. Marking the fighting age Muslim immigrants 'Return to Sender' won't work. They will just vanish into the woodwork where the government's laws end and Europe's nightmare begins.
if they stay the course, the voting majority of sweden will be orthodox muslim within 10 years.
but the natural population of sweden is small enough, and the "refugees" they imported significant enough, and the birth rates of each group disparate enough, that in 30 years, muslims will still be the voting majority in 30 years.
the only solution is to start deporting people, or swedish feminism will have invited their own country to be conquered.
Most immigrants of all sorts will leave if the money dries up. As soon as you stop paying for people to flood your streets, they'll fuck off back to their own country because that's where all their actual friends and family are. They might be forming colonies, but they are not true pioneers. They will choose to leave.
Worse, for Muslims, the degeneracy of the west is already a problem they are dealing with in Muslim countries. Muslims in the west will be most welcomed by communities that will support the sexualization of their children, and childlessness. They'll leave too because there's no point in staying if your children will castrate themselves.
Marking the fighting age Muslim immigrants 'Return to Sender' won't work. They will just vanish into the woodwork where the government's laws end and Europe's nightmare begins.
I think Sweden would actually be pretty good at this. Their government is intrusive. They probably know where people are. It's not like America.
I mean, let's be honest, we could accomplish that in America too... just enforce anti-illegal laws on businesses and welfare, send the National Guard to the border to turn away all crossers, and there will be no way for illegals to subsist in the country or come back once they're deported. We just don't have the political will to do this.
He claims that 'citizenship' defines what makes a person Swedish. (Hint: no it doesn't.)
He claims that they're implementing the 'strictest EU immigration policy', yet he still mentions mass immigration, which most likely means that it isn't going to stop.
He then goes on to say that rejected asylum seekers will really be sent back, but we all know that they won't, because you would need to compel other countries to take them back, which they will refuse.
Then he whines about language stipulations and social studies. Things that other countries have already implemented decades ago. 'Strictest'.
You're right about that citizenship argument.
As comedian Bernard Manning would say, "Just because a dog's born in a stable, it don't make it a fucking horse!"
Lets get a few things straight here in this thread:
The PM is from the conservacuck party the 'Moderates', the governments hand is being forced by the Sweden Democrats in which they signed a very specific treaty with where dates are set for reforms to be made by. If they are not completed by that date a vote of no confidence is going to be called, and they will reject any PM suggestions from the speaker until an automatic extra election will be called.
The Sweden Democrats made the concession of not being part of the government in return for this treaty, as well as getting presidential roles in several of the law preparing committees, which have great power when it comes to formulating the exact phrases in the law.
The PM is basically their pawn when it comes to the matters of immigration and related matters, and has no say in what is being done, he is merely pretending to act as the man in power in order to not look weak.
What matters are actions not words and just a few days ago the European Union passed a law requiring EU nations to accept migrants or face hefty fines, Sweden voted in favour!
too little, too late, provided this PM isn't controlled opposition
Sweden has an Islamic minority and no-go zones. Marking the fighting age Muslim immigrants 'Return to Sender' won't work. They will just vanish into the woodwork where the government's laws end and Europe's nightmare begins.
if they stay the course, the voting majority of sweden will be orthodox muslim within 10 years.
but the natural population of sweden is small enough, and the "refugees" they imported significant enough, and the birth rates of each group disparate enough, that in 30 years, muslims will still be the voting majority in 30 years.
the only solution is to start deporting people, or swedish feminism will have invited their own country to be conquered.
Hard disagree.
Most immigrants of all sorts will leave if the money dries up. As soon as you stop paying for people to flood your streets, they'll fuck off back to their own country because that's where all their actual friends and family are. They might be forming colonies, but they are not true pioneers. They will choose to leave.
Worse, for Muslims, the degeneracy of the west is already a problem they are dealing with in Muslim countries. Muslims in the west will be most welcomed by communities that will support the sexualization of their children, and childlessness. They'll leave too because there's no point in staying if your children will castrate themselves.
I think Sweden would actually be pretty good at this. Their government is intrusive. They probably know where people are. It's not like America.
I mean, let's be honest, we could accomplish that in America too... just enforce anti-illegal laws on businesses and welfare, send the National Guard to the border to turn away all crossers, and there will be no way for illegals to subsist in the country or come back once they're deported. We just don't have the political will to do this.
The Swedes are on the road to extinction.
He claims that 'citizenship' defines what makes a person Swedish. (Hint: no it doesn't.)
He claims that they're implementing the 'strictest EU immigration policy', yet he still mentions mass immigration, which most likely means that it isn't going to stop.
He then goes on to say that rejected asylum seekers will really be sent back, but we all know that they won't, because you would need to compel other countries to take them back, which they will refuse.
Then he whines about language stipulations and social studies. Things that other countries have already implemented decades ago. 'Strictest'.
You're right about that citizenship argument. As comedian Bernard Manning would say, "Just because a dog's born in a stable, it don't make it a fucking horse!"
Lets get a few things straight here in this thread:
The PM is from the conservacuck party the 'Moderates', the governments hand is being forced by the Sweden Democrats in which they signed a very specific treaty with where dates are set for reforms to be made by. If they are not completed by that date a vote of no confidence is going to be called, and they will reject any PM suggestions from the speaker until an automatic extra election will be called.
The Sweden Democrats made the concession of not being part of the government in return for this treaty, as well as getting presidential roles in several of the law preparing committees, which have great power when it comes to formulating the exact phrases in the law.
The PM is basically their pawn when it comes to the matters of immigration and related matters, and has no say in what is being done, he is merely pretending to act as the man in power in order to not look weak.
90% of immigrants will leave as son as you cut off the gibbs.
EU: "And we took that personally."
What matters are actions not words and just a few days ago the European Union passed a law requiring EU nations to accept migrants or face hefty fines, Sweden voted in favour!
https://rmx.news/european-union/member-states-forced-to-accept-migrants-or-face-hefty-fines-after-majority-vote-passed-on-new-eu-rules/
Well, then.
When I see it and hear it from Swedes, sure, until then, it's just populist talk.
Good to see but seems to late. I thought that. OU tries in EU can’t make a decision like this?
Hasn't the EU buck broken them?