Update to Previous Story About Columbian Killing Tranny Hooker
(www.news.com.au)
Comments (38)
sorted by:
It should be self defense from a rapist. He should be hailed an hero
He paid a man not a woman and the man raped him.
Wait, so you now agree with banning prostitution? Based and tradpilled.
What problem did they create?
How many women in your life have 'treated you like shit'?
The guy hired a hooker without proper vetting. The tranny raped him by deception. One is stupid, the other is evil. Equating the two is ridiculous .
Taking some time out from pulling the wings off flies and kicking the dog, are you?
No, he's entertaining.
Comment Reported for:
Comment Removed: Rule 3. He's heard worse so you didn't impress anyone.
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Threaten harass, bully, defame
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
tl;dr - not guilty of murder, will be tried for manslaughter, which is ironically mans laughter
It's also MAN slaughter.
He did slaughter a man, so the name is fitting.
Doesn't make good optics when a beautiful brown person from some noble impoverished shithole in South America kills a tranny. It wrecks the narrative that white men are responsible for all bad things in the world and immigrants are good.
LOL. Buddy, I doubt your religious beliefs, assuming you have any, permit pre-marital sex with hookers, but that didn't stop you. I'd believe your defense more if you went for a self-defense angle. Though I guess to be fair, lefties believe you should just lie down and let people kill you when you're attacked rather than defend your person, so I guess the religious argument was the only real defense you had.
He should say whatever maximizes his chance of acquittal. He did the world a favor by making sure he was the last man the tranny ever trapped.
Unironically, it supports the narrative that immigrants are good.
🧐
As I said in the initial thread I don't know how a) a dude pushing 70 can pass as a late 30s woman and b) how he can get it up at that age.
That's the point that has me SMH
LOLOLOL what the fuck?
LOL he strangled "her" to death. That's super obvious. For the judge to say he didn't intend serious harm is basically nullification.
You can't kill someone with strangulation in seconds, it takes minutes of sustained pressure.
*him
https://archive.is/bIllp
Absolute madness. This guy was raped and now he's going to be sentenced for manslaughter... even though that also requires intent to kill.
And what if he did? A rape victim has every right to defend himself against his attacker.
I guess it differs by jurisdiction, where I live, manslaughter is intentional killing in the moment.
Further Update - GUILTY of MAN SLAUGHTER :
https://www.9news.com.au/national/hector-enrique-valencia-valencia-trial-colombian-student-found-guilty-manslaughter-killing-sex-worker-kimberley-mcrae/0840ca19-21a6-46a9-b472-0ae7f1e2689a?ref=BP_RSS_ninenews_2_colombian-student-found-guilty-of-killing-sydney-sex-worker_250223
This has more pics
And More -
https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/courts-law/inside-sex-workers-final-hours-before-she-was-killed/news-story/9a8d8b423b39eadb204a584a9efbbb0c