So much for the idea of pandering to identity groups that hate us. It will never be enough and we don't need to be trying to out Democrat the Democrats.
What do you mean? Regardless of whether pandering to identity groups "that hate us" (Republicans, I assume) is a good idea, surely a Politico hitpiece on a neocon is no reason to do it or not do it?
I didn't bother reading the garbage, so keep in mind that I was just responding to the title. All I'm saying is that we shouldn't be imitating the Democrats' habit of treating favored identities as positive characteristics in a candidate. The GOP's unmarriageable whore problem won't get better if we nominate a woman. Its race communist problem won't improve if we nominate a pee oh see. Bathhouse Barry and Kumswala are all the proof we need that diversity candidates are bad news.
All I'm saying is that we shouldn't be imitating the Democrats' habit of treating favored identities as positive characteristics in a candidate
Absolutely. But that goes without saying.
Bathhouse Barry and Kumswala are all the proof we need that diversity candidates are bad news.
"Bathhouse Barry" definitely was good for the Democrats - he got them two terms in the White House. Like him or not, he was a very talented politician, and if the Republicans had someone similar, they should definitely nominate him. And I'm not even talking race here.
Translation: She’s not white, but she’s Republican. That’s all that’s “fraught” here based on everything I know about the left and its current worldview.
Everything is race. I’d love to buy this publication and Fire people for bringing up race when there is no reason to. Then I’d buy a gaming site and fire the staff so I could hire actual fans of gaming.
So much for the idea of pandering to identity groups that hate us. It will never be enough and we don't need to be trying to out Democrat the Democrats.
What do you mean? Regardless of whether pandering to identity groups "that hate us" (Republicans, I assume) is a good idea, surely a Politico hitpiece on a neocon is no reason to do it or not do it?
I didn't bother reading the garbage, so keep in mind that I was just responding to the title. All I'm saying is that we shouldn't be imitating the Democrats' habit of treating favored identities as positive characteristics in a candidate. The GOP's unmarriageable whore problem won't get better if we nominate a woman. Its race communist problem won't improve if we nominate a pee oh see. Bathhouse Barry and Kumswala are all the proof we need that diversity candidates are bad news.
Absolutely. But that goes without saying.
"Bathhouse Barry" definitely was good for the Democrats - he got them two terms in the White House. Like him or not, he was a very talented politician, and if the Republicans had someone similar, they should definitely nominate him. And I'm not even talking race here.
It required SIX people to write this hitpiece on Nikki Haley, who is a Democrat in all but name.
The fuck kind of name is "Brakkton"?
This bitch is a retarded neocon and won't win
Translation: She’s not white, but she’s Republican. That’s all that’s “fraught” here based on everything I know about the left and its current worldview.
In what world is she the first prominent Republican to take on Trump?
I think they're referring to anyone officially running for the 2024 race.
too close to foreign for my taste.
Everything is race. I’d love to buy this publication and Fire people for bringing up race when there is no reason to. Then I’d buy a gaming site and fire the staff so I could hire actual fans of gaming.
She's a vile RINO like most of D.C. Her allegiance is only to the MIC, she's an eternal war advocate. We need another outsider, not more uni-swamp.