What I said was that GC was long overdue a banning for the same reason women used to ban MGTOW.
I would lose my job if I publicly hated women. Why can't they lose theirs for publicly hating trannies? They should lose their jobs for publicly hating men, but no company wants to take on their masses of funding.
What I said was that GC was long overdue a banning for the same reason women used to ban MGTOW.
One of your talents is stuffing your comments with so much BS that it's impossible to have a logical conversation. For one, here you make the claim that "women" banned MGTOW. Regardless, if you thought the admins were angry about GC making negative comments about men, you're even more deranged than anyone here thinks.
I would lose my job if I publicly hated women. Why can't they lose theirs for publicly hating trannies? They should lose their jobs for publicly hating men, but no company wants to take on their masses of funding.
So you want people to lose their jobs for being critical of troons.
I've thought before that he might be a parody account to highlight how fucking stupid the other collectivist identity politics tards on here (the wannabe nazis) are.
They often use this manipulation when women are angry about trans rapists in female prisons
That is the most neocon of bullshit establishment positions. Nobody will censor it. The reason why TERFs always get censored is because when enough of them gather, they start sharing male genocide fantasies.
Even then, they usually get away with it until they start planning some mass murder.
Do you mean that they banned the sub in anticipation of "TERFs advocating actual violence"? If so, are you claiming that they actually care about advocating violence against non-protected groups?
OK, so you have no actual evidence. And even your example is laughable, as the regressivists were not banned after they stalked the homes of Supreme Court justices, including that of TRAITOR ACB.
I wouldn't have told you that 20 years ago. Hell, I probably wouldn't have told you that 6 months ago, but the not misogynistic connotation of that makes a ton of sense.
Women are literally magical creatures (as a concept). That is to say, yes human females are material, but their perception is actually entirely metaphysical.
Women don't even use words to solve problems, speaking is just another form of social navigation and filtering. It's more a of a dance. Women also live within "the aesthetic", and create narratives around the aesthetic. The value of this, and of femininity, is that it can craft meaning in a world. If they master aesthetics, they master the inspiration that men need to use their agency. But the only way to understand an aesthetic nature is to basically live within in. Meaning that women are basically living in aesthetics, narrative, feelings, social filtering, even hyper-reality. They must have a man to ground them to cold reality, but only a woman can make a cold reality and turn it into a warm home.
The strange truth is that you shouldn't listen to women because they aren't telling you anything, and they aren't trying to. You should instead only watch them, or feel them, and then react accordingly to bind them to reality, and to help them craft a proper aesthetic.
I almost feel like the reason earlier generations tried to teach women to be quiet is so that men could hear them better. Men can probably listen to them more when they aren't talking.
Ah... those last two paragraphs might be the best description of women I've ever seen. Actually, the whole piece is -- I think if TheImp could internalize this, he'd realize that he's only talking about women who've moved out of the schema you describe in your 2nd to last paragraph.
Armed with what? Cricket bats? That's about the best you can manage for a widespread option in most of the UK these days and it means sweet fuck all vs the government armed forces, be that the actual Armed Forces or just specialist divisions of the police.
The plebs already have dwindling options to protest and while numbers can help during riots there are as always going to be opportunitists who simply take advantage of things so they can loot. Be that actual looters during the riots or companies that swoop in and buy up places that no longer have the ability to cover the increases in insurance or have been burned to the ground and are now spots of land to develop into more ugly flats which will charge extortionate rates in rent.
Funny, the 'asians' and africans have no problem taking over parts of the country and those same armed groups exist for them. You get enough people together, a bunch of pansies in uniforms (of which there are less and less due to people not joining their ranks anymore) are quickly overrun.
Because contrary to what women would like to portray, none of us are eager to kill them. That's their thing, not ours. They just project it.
Also, a physical war on women would likely be a very complex situation, and the feminists in charge would no doubt violate the Geneva Convention several times with dirtier and dirtier tactics to protect their power. If there's anyone I think would sign off on biological warfare, it's a woman in power against a country/group fighting against feminism's genocidal march.
Stupid reply. Did you hear about that guy that shot his wife in England? What they don't mention is that he filed a DV claim against her 7 years prior. Where's JK Rowling to say that he's the poor victim, abused until he snapped and killed her?
It's also never a good idea to get violent when you're the weaker side, but women are clearly itching to.
Stupid reply. Did you hear about that guy that shot his wife in England? What they don't mention is that he filed a DV claim against her 7 years prior. Where's JK Rowling to say that he's the poor victim, abused until he snapped and killed her?
Are more women killed by men each year or the other way around?
It's also never a good idea to get violent when you're the weaker side, but women are clearly itching to.
Who commits more violence each year, men or women?
The people who support or defend this kind of thing only ever learn when it directly affects them (and even then, some leftists refuse to let go of their preachy naivete). So, for the sake of those around them who don't support this bullshit, I hope they get third worlded.
Literally every subreddit that gets more than 5 posts per day is run by feds at this point.
Comments restricted++
It seems to mean the narrative is being heavily shaped by moderators.
They often use this manipulation when women are angry about trans rapists in female prisons. Their aim is to dismiss them as bigots.
Probably they are doing the same “shaping” on this topic.
Literal "But what if he rapes me? What if SHE rapes you, you TERF whore" from the Ricky Gervais bit.
You can't seriously believe TERFs are censored...
Said the guy who cheered the Reddit admins banning GenderCritical, and who thought that people should lose their jobs for not calling troons women.
What I said was that GC was long overdue a banning for the same reason women used to ban MGTOW.
I would lose my job if I publicly hated women. Why can't they lose theirs for publicly hating trannies? They should lose their jobs for publicly hating men, but no company wants to take on their masses of funding.
One of your talents is stuffing your comments with so much BS that it's impossible to have a logical conversation. For one, here you make the claim that "women" banned MGTOW. Regardless, if you thought the admins were angry about GC making negative comments about men, you're even more deranged than anyone here thinks.
So you want people to lose their jobs for being critical of troons.
Thanks for making things obvious.
Imp has to he a woman who hates women so much they trooned out.
There's no other explanation for the sheer insanity
I've thought before that he might be a parody account to highlight how fucking stupid the other collectivist identity politics tards on here (the wannabe nazis) are.
Or he could actually just be that deranged.
Go back to the loo, poo.
I'm not..Indian..?
That is the most neocon of bullshit establishment positions. Nobody will censor it. The reason why TERFs always get censored is because when enough of them gather, they start sharing male genocide fantasies.
Even then, they usually get away with it until they start planning some mass murder.
So male genocide fantasies are censored?
Huh.
Because with TERFs, they start advocating actual violence eventually.
Do you mean that they banned the sub in anticipation of "TERFs advocating actual violence"? If so, are you claiming that they actually care about advocating violence against non-protected groups?
Yes, TERFs already did advocate violence. Remember when a group of them went to a tranny's home because it mocked JK Rowling on Twitter?
No, they didn't want some psycho going to shoot up a pride parade.
OK, so you have no actual evidence. And even your example is laughable, as the regressivists were not banned after they stalked the homes of Supreme Court justices, including that of TRAITOR ACB.
I mean, you could just open Ovarit, see their near constant calls for violence and infer from that.
TERFs are pro-abortion, this argument is ridiculous.
Everyone knows how to solve this.
To be fair, Imp's advice of "stop listening to women" is actually good advice generally on how to solve many problems.
Where were you 20 years ago when I needed to hear that!
I wouldn't have told you that 20 years ago. Hell, I probably wouldn't have told you that 6 months ago, but the not misogynistic connotation of that makes a ton of sense.
Women are literally magical creatures (as a concept). That is to say, yes human females are material, but their perception is actually entirely metaphysical.
Women don't even use words to solve problems, speaking is just another form of social navigation and filtering. It's more a of a dance. Women also live within "the aesthetic", and create narratives around the aesthetic. The value of this, and of femininity, is that it can craft meaning in a world. If they master aesthetics, they master the inspiration that men need to use their agency. But the only way to understand an aesthetic nature is to basically live within in. Meaning that women are basically living in aesthetics, narrative, feelings, social filtering, even hyper-reality. They must have a man to ground them to cold reality, but only a woman can make a cold reality and turn it into a warm home.
The strange truth is that you shouldn't listen to women because they aren't telling you anything, and they aren't trying to. You should instead only watch them, or feel them, and then react accordingly to bind them to reality, and to help them craft a proper aesthetic.
I almost feel like the reason earlier generations tried to teach women to be quiet is so that men could hear them better. Men can probably listen to them more when they aren't talking.
Ah... those last two paragraphs might be the best description of women I've ever seen. Actually, the whole piece is -- I think if TheImp could internalize this, he'd realize that he's only talking about women who've moved out of the schema you describe in your 2nd to last paragraph.
Thanks.
Stop listening to women, protest outside Number 10 to stop the misogyny law?
Why do you support your country being invaded?
his country is israel
Next civil war when?
For a civil war, there would need to be stark divisions in the political nation (the elites).
At the moment, there are none. All are on board with globalism, immigration, neoliberalism and immigrants raping British girls.
Armed with what? Cricket bats? That's about the best you can manage for a widespread option in most of the UK these days and it means sweet fuck all vs the government armed forces, be that the actual Armed Forces or just specialist divisions of the police.
The plebs already have dwindling options to protest and while numbers can help during riots there are as always going to be opportunitists who simply take advantage of things so they can loot. Be that actual looters during the riots or companies that swoop in and buy up places that no longer have the ability to cover the increases in insurance or have been burned to the ground and are now spots of land to develop into more ugly flats which will charge extortionate rates in rent.
Funny, the 'asians' and africans have no problem taking over parts of the country and those same armed groups exist for them. You get enough people together, a bunch of pansies in uniforms (of which there are less and less due to people not joining their ranks anymore) are quickly overrun.
Gender war. Nothing else will fix that fucking country.
Hopefully it will just be an ideological war.
If only a gender war would fix things, why do you hope for an ideological war (which I agree is preferable).
Because contrary to what women would like to portray, none of us are eager to kill them. That's their thing, not ours. They just project it.
Also, a physical war on women would likely be a very complex situation, and the feminists in charge would no doubt violate the Geneva Convention several times with dirtier and dirtier tactics to protect their power. If there's anyone I think would sign off on biological warfare, it's a woman in power against a country/group fighting against feminism's genocidal march.
Are more women killed by men each year or the other way around?
It's never a good idea to violate the Geneva Convention when you are the weaker side.
Stupid reply. Did you hear about that guy that shot his wife in England? What they don't mention is that he filed a DV claim against her 7 years prior. Where's JK Rowling to say that he's the poor victim, abused until he snapped and killed her?
It's also never a good idea to get violent when you're the weaker side, but women are clearly itching to.
Are more women killed by men each year or the other way around?
Who commits more violence each year, men or women?
Pure numbers don't tell the story. Especially as the ONS still refuses to provide statistics on female violence.
The amount of copes there are crazy
"Muslim grooming gangs are okay because sometimes its a british man doing it"
The people who support or defend this kind of thing only ever learn when it directly affects them (and even then, some leftists refuse to let go of their preachy naivete). So, for the sake of those around them who don't support this bullshit, I hope they get third worlded.
They've crammed every hotel in my city full. Including our nicest, fanciest ones.
These people are all living here for free.
i wish they'd just start killing them in the dead of night.
It's adorable how much bullshit women will start in the UK to cover up what they're up to. Really shows how fucking stupid they think men all are.
You're still the enemy. I hope the young men realize fast enough to stop you.