Do you mean that they banned the sub in anticipation of "TERFs advocating actual violence"? If so, are you claiming that they actually care about advocating violence against non-protected groups?
OK, so you have no actual evidence. And even your example is laughable, as the regressivists were not banned after they stalked the homes of Supreme Court justices, including that of TRAITOR ACB.
Do you mean that they banned the sub in anticipation of "TERFs advocating actual violence"? If so, are you claiming that they actually care about advocating violence against non-protected groups?
Yes, TERFs already did advocate violence. Remember when a group of them went to a tranny's home because it mocked JK Rowling on Twitter?
No, they didn't want some psycho going to shoot up a pride parade.
OK, so you have no actual evidence. And even your example is laughable, as the regressivists were not banned after they stalked the homes of Supreme Court justices, including that of TRAITOR ACB.
I mean, you could just open Ovarit, see their near constant calls for violence and infer from that.
TERFs are pro-abortion, this argument is ridiculous.
The Reddit admins whose 'girldick' you suck policed the GenderCritical sub, not Ovarit. You have provided no evidence at all of any call for violence.
And they certainly didn't ban people on the same side as those terrorizing the Supreme Court justices, so your argument is even dumber than normal.