I wouldn't have told you that 20 years ago. Hell, I probably wouldn't have told you that 6 months ago, but the not misogynistic connotation of that makes a ton of sense.
Women are literally magical creatures (as a concept). That is to say, yes human females are material, but their perception is actually entirely metaphysical.
Women don't even use words to solve problems, speaking is just another form of social navigation and filtering. It's more a of a dance. Women also live within "the aesthetic", and create narratives around the aesthetic. The value of this, and of femininity, is that it can craft meaning in a world. If they master aesthetics, they master the inspiration that men need to use their agency. But the only way to understand an aesthetic nature is to basically live within in. Meaning that women are basically living in aesthetics, narrative, feelings, social filtering, even hyper-reality. They must have a man to ground them to cold reality, but only a woman can make a cold reality and turn it into a warm home.
The strange truth is that you shouldn't listen to women because they aren't telling you anything, and they aren't trying to. You should instead only watch them, or feel them, and then react accordingly to bind them to reality, and to help them craft a proper aesthetic.
I almost feel like the reason earlier generations tried to teach women to be quiet is so that men could hear them better. Men can probably listen to them more when they aren't talking.
Ah... those last two paragraphs might be the best description of women I've ever seen. Actually, the whole piece is -- I think if TheImp could internalize this, he'd realize that he's only talking about women who've moved out of the schema you describe in your 2nd to last paragraph.
Where were you 20 years ago when I needed to hear that!
I wouldn't have told you that 20 years ago. Hell, I probably wouldn't have told you that 6 months ago, but the not misogynistic connotation of that makes a ton of sense.
Women are literally magical creatures (as a concept). That is to say, yes human females are material, but their perception is actually entirely metaphysical.
Women don't even use words to solve problems, speaking is just another form of social navigation and filtering. It's more a of a dance. Women also live within "the aesthetic", and create narratives around the aesthetic. The value of this, and of femininity, is that it can craft meaning in a world. If they master aesthetics, they master the inspiration that men need to use their agency. But the only way to understand an aesthetic nature is to basically live within in. Meaning that women are basically living in aesthetics, narrative, feelings, social filtering, even hyper-reality. They must have a man to ground them to cold reality, but only a woman can make a cold reality and turn it into a warm home.
The strange truth is that you shouldn't listen to women because they aren't telling you anything, and they aren't trying to. You should instead only watch them, or feel them, and then react accordingly to bind them to reality, and to help them craft a proper aesthetic.
I almost feel like the reason earlier generations tried to teach women to be quiet is so that men could hear them better. Men can probably listen to them more when they aren't talking.
Ah... those last two paragraphs might be the best description of women I've ever seen. Actually, the whole piece is -- I think if TheImp could internalize this, he'd realize that he's only talking about women who've moved out of the schema you describe in your 2nd to last paragraph.
Thanks.