What the hell, surrogacy already exists. Next this psycho woman will be justifying rifling through coma patients' pockets for keys as "full-vehicular donation" because she doesn't like paying for rentals.
Also she should be careful what she wishes on brain dead women, if she's saying stuff like "there's no medical reason not to" she's halfway there herself. The author presumably didn't find a paper explicitly comparing rates of complication and miscarriage, for the same reason there are no papers weighing the risks of normal pregnancy Vs pregnancy locked in a cage with bears, it's very rare and the qualitative answer should be self evident.
As someone else has already said it extremely expensive to keep someone alive and healthy after brain-death, and "healthy" is a relative term there.They're extremely prone to infection and a slew of other issues and more often than not are on a cocktail of drugs to combat those, not ideal in pregnancy. Not to mention the weird developmental problems that will arise out of being essentially stationary for the whole 9 months. The patient can be moved around in specific ways to help prevent sores forming, not so much for the fetus. For any medical professional with half a functioning brain it should be presumed that a brain-dead pregnancy is at a much higher risk of developmental defects and miscarriage until proven otherwise by data, not the other way around.
Hell, turning brain-dead patients into perpetual Mad Max style bloodbags would be marginally more ethical, because at least it might actually work and would potentially solve a life-threatening problem.
"keep me alive for 9 months while I'm used as a braindead incubator"
What, you think they'd let something that valuable go after one? She'd be churning out a hatchling a year for the lizard people until her uterus disintegrated. Brain-dead but otherwise alive/intact women aren't that common.
Victim dies everytime one of these wackos gets a vegetable pregnant, either from complications of the pregnancy or birth. This is just some sicko putting out their scat porn.
fuck it. i'm out.
ps-- add source. contextless screen grabs are beneath you.
You know, after all the sick shit that gets posted on here about what the left and elites do, I wouldn't think I'd be surprised.
But making corpses into baby factories, I think even Alex Jones didn't see this one coming...
This is how you end up releasing demons into our universe. This is some Slaanesh level stuff right here.
We already crossed that Rubicon by normalizing troonery.
Are The Good Times Really Over?
Also: Daemonculaba. (Go ahead, search that image. NSFW btw)
Who wrote this transphobic trash? Brain-dead men can't also give birth?
What the hell, surrogacy already exists. Next this psycho woman will be justifying rifling through coma patients' pockets for keys as "full-vehicular donation" because she doesn't like paying for rentals.
Also she should be careful what she wishes on brain dead women, if she's saying stuff like "there's no medical reason not to" she's halfway there herself. The author presumably didn't find a paper explicitly comparing rates of complication and miscarriage, for the same reason there are no papers weighing the risks of normal pregnancy Vs pregnancy locked in a cage with bears, it's very rare and the qualitative answer should be self evident.
As someone else has already said it extremely expensive to keep someone alive and healthy after brain-death, and "healthy" is a relative term there.They're extremely prone to infection and a slew of other issues and more often than not are on a cocktail of drugs to combat those, not ideal in pregnancy. Not to mention the weird developmental problems that will arise out of being essentially stationary for the whole 9 months. The patient can be moved around in specific ways to help prevent sores forming, not so much for the fetus. For any medical professional with half a functioning brain it should be presumed that a brain-dead pregnancy is at a much higher risk of developmental defects and miscarriage until proven otherwise by data, not the other way around.
Hell, turning brain-dead patients into perpetual Mad Max style bloodbags would be marginally more ethical, because at least it might actually work and would potentially solve a life-threatening problem.
You can get a surrogate, but not if you talk like this.
What, you think they'd let something that valuable go after one? She'd be churning out a hatchling a year for the lizard people until her uterus disintegrated. Brain-dead but otherwise alive/intact women aren't that common.
That's so hard to do you need to look at the international... "market". Much easier to get a doped-up Somalian.
Wtf so is this just surrogacy but extended to repurposed corpses?
"We already know that pregnancies can be successfully carried to term in brain-dead women."
Hey, liberal women might finally find a purpose in life!
Using dead bodies as baby pods is one of the most ghoulish ideas I've ever heard.
Sounds like the plot for a fantasy/sci fi movie. Necromancer begins growing minions in dead bodies. Plans to assault a castle somewhere.
Pretty much every time the entire world goes to shit, it's immediately preceded by man's hubris reaching a critical mass.
We're there, by the way.
Victim dies everytime one of these wackos gets a vegetable pregnant, either from complications of the pregnancy or birth. This is just some sicko putting out their scat porn.
Frank Herbert predicted this.
Meanwhile, Imp is furiously masturbating over this.
Might as well start having courtroom seances at this point since we’re already into demonic land with this shit
Artificial wombs is about as plausible as bottom surgery. Now slavery of the brain dead is a fact of life. Just look around you.
I'm pretty sure there was a scene like this in The Island.
Yo System Shock 2 called it!