A gay non-binary shooter charged with hate crimes against LGBTQ 😂. In contrast Waukesha driver got only 75 charges for more killed+injured and no hate crime charges despite clear evidence of racial hatred and motivations. Rule of law has become selective in America to the applause of millions.
I still think the Charlottesville wignat getting framed for terrorism when he was actually just a horrible (and panicky) driver is the worst political prosecution we've seen so far. I don't see any way he's actually guilty of murder, but he had absolutely no one in his corner.
The Charlottesville dude was convicted for being a retard that praised Hitler in a phone call with his mom and then that was played for the jury. He did himself in
Comment Approved: So, this isn't really what this rule is for. Almond is advocating for, what appears to be, public execution for murderers. That's not really the same as calling for murder. It's actually advocating for a judicial killing, as the result of a crime, but in a public space.
Which, by the way, most executions still are open to the public.
Which, by the way, most executions still are open to the public.
All judicial killings must be open to the public. To do otherwise allows the government to kill without the knowledge or consent of the government, in secret. That is a fundamental aspect of tyranny, and it is to be avoided.
There is room to argue whether a just government is possible, or whether any government can have the moral authority to kill one of its own citizens, but that executions must be open to the public (if they are performed) should be inarguable.
I tend to agree. The only difference is when the government intends to kill someone who is bunkered and barricaded in a defensive strong point, but intends to continue being an active threat if they escape their strong point, so the government kills them (Like with the Dallas BLM shooter, or Christopher Donner). In such a case they aren't in public, but the tactical circumstances dictate that more than anything else.
The three-strikes law championed by Clinton came about because judges were being too lenient on career criminal blacks. It was an enforcement problem where the law was selectively applied way back then.
The penalty for harming straight white peoples is less severe than the penalty for harming LGBT or non-white peoples. Intent no longer plays any part in the designation of hate crimes. Such designations are now determined purely by the identity categories of the perpetrators and the victims.
This environment creates strong incentives for members of unprotected identities - straight whites - to obtain membership in protected identities. In this instance, the only such option is self-identification as LGBT.
So not only is it open season on whitey, but the only escape for whitey is to take refuge in the leftist ideology of the LGBT movement.
305 Individual counts for the Non-Binary Otherkin?
Need to check the online sportsbooks for the Over/Under on its impending Arkancide or "Prison Accident". No way The Powers that Be let ZeZimZer testify in open court or anywhere near a microphone.
A gay non-binary shooter charged with hate crimes against LGBTQ 😂. In contrast Waukesha driver got only 75 charges for more killed+injured and no hate crime charges despite clear evidence of racial hatred and motivations. Rule of law has become selective in America to the applause of millions.
I still think the Charlottesville wignat getting framed for terrorism when he was actually just a horrible (and panicky) driver is the worst political prosecution we've seen so far. I don't see any way he's actually guilty of murder, but he had absolutely no one in his corner.
The Charlottesville dude was convicted for being a retard that praised Hitler in a phone call with his mom and then that was played for the jury. He did himself in
Equal application should be unerodably entrenched in constitutional law, and the fact it isn't is an enormous oversight.
... at the wall, or in the town square.
I like the way you think.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Approved: So, this isn't really what this rule is for. Almond is advocating for, what appears to be, public execution for murderers. That's not really the same as calling for murder. It's actually advocating for a judicial killing, as the result of a crime, but in a public space.
Which, by the way, most executions still are open to the public.
All judicial killings must be open to the public. To do otherwise allows the government to kill without the knowledge or consent of the government, in secret. That is a fundamental aspect of tyranny, and it is to be avoided.
There is room to argue whether a just government is possible, or whether any government can have the moral authority to kill one of its own citizens, but that executions must be open to the public (if they are performed) should be inarguable.
I tend to agree. The only difference is when the government intends to kill someone who is bunkered and barricaded in a defensive strong point, but intends to continue being an active threat if they escape their strong point, so the government kills them (Like with the Dallas BLM shooter, or Christopher Donner). In such a case they aren't in public, but the tactical circumstances dictate that more than anything else.
The three-strikes law championed by Clinton came about because judges were being too lenient on career criminal blacks. It was an enforcement problem where the law was selectively applied way back then.
How can he be gay if he doesn't know what his gender is? The concept of gay doesn't make sense for a nonbinary person under their retarded ideology.
The same reason they can admit there is no proven immutability to being gay but have it be protected by the civil rights act all the same
Looks like even while they are framing this as a hate crime, they respect Mx. Aldrich's pronouns...
Even his drug addled pornstar dad admitted Aldrich was gay and came out publicly
Edit: got it backwards
I thought he said: I'm glad he was the shooter and not gay.
Yep, misread it
The penalty for harming straight white peoples is less severe than the penalty for harming LGBT or non-white peoples. Intent no longer plays any part in the designation of hate crimes. Such designations are now determined purely by the identity categories of the perpetrators and the victims.
This environment creates strong incentives for members of unprotected identities - straight whites - to obtain membership in protected identities. In this instance, the only such option is self-identification as LGBT.
So not only is it open season on whitey, but the only escape for whitey is to take refuge in the leftist ideology of the LGBT movement.
Well, there are other solutions but they kind of glow a bit...
305 Individual counts for the Non-Binary Otherkin?
Need to check the online sportsbooks for the Over/Under on its impending Arkancide or "Prison Accident". No way The Powers that Be let ZeZimZer testify in open court or anywhere near a microphone.
This is going overboard which risks the case which increases risk of further backlash and blah,blah
TLDR: law is too politicised to do it's job
if anything wouldnt this garner more sympathy and lax punishment. seems they tried hard to say his parents made him this way or something.